|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dbm per Trans Rate Question
really understand the concept. Below is one example Product Specifications: 17 dbm at 6 to 24mbs; 12 dbm at 54mbs Seems to me it would be opposite but its evident I dont understand something, unless it means compared to distance. i.e. if you are close enough you can get 54mbs at 12dbm but it takes 17 to get you 6 to 24 at a further distance? Is this just a static statistic? Thanks, Airhead
Show quote
Hide quote
"Airhead" <campb***@alliancecable.net> wrote in message I think I answered my own question,, these specs were for Transmit Powernews:421a5170$0$22518$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com... > While comparing some products I have ran across this a few times and dont > really understand > the concept. Below is one example > > Product Specifications: > > 17 dbm at 6 to 24mbs; > 12 dbm at 54mbs > > Seems to me it would be opposite but its evident I dont understand > something, > unless it means compared to distance. i.e. if you are close enough you can > get > 54mbs at 12dbm but it takes 17 to get you 6 to 24 at a further distance? > Is this just a static statistic? > > Thanks, > Airhead Control for 802.11h in th 5ghz band...evidently made for Europe. The Ap listens on the channel and adjusts its power down if there is another detected 5ghz channel, or it uses DFS and jsut changes channels automatically.
Show quote
Hide quote
"Airhead" <campb***@alliancecable.net> wrote in message Wish I could delete this post.......I am not sure what it is. If you wantnews:421a5f51$0$22518$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com... > > "Airhead" <campb***@alliancecable.net> wrote in message > news:421a5170$0$22518$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com... > > While comparing some products I have ran across this a few times and dont > > really understand > > the concept. Below is one example > > > > Product Specifications: > > > > 17 dbm at 6 to 24mbs; > > 12 dbm at 54mbs > > > > Seems to me it would be opposite but its evident I dont understand > > something, > > unless it means compared to distance. i.e. if you are close enough you can > > get > > 54mbs at 12dbm but it takes 17 to get you 6 to 24 at a further distance? > > Is this just a static statistic? > > > > Thanks, > > Airhead > > > I think I answered my own question,, these specs were for Transmit Power > Control > for 802.11h in th 5ghz band...evidently made for Europe. The Ap listens on > the channel > and adjusts its power down if there is another detected 5ghz channel, or it > uses DFS > and jsut changes channels automatically. > > to take a look check out a colubris ap spec sheet On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:17:18 -0600, "Airhead"
<campb***@alliancecable.net> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >While comparing some products I have ran across this a few times and dont I guess you mean the tx power spec at:>really understand >the concept. Below is one example > >Product Specifications: > >17 dbm at 6 to 24mbs; >12 dbm at 54mbs > >Seems to me it would be opposite but its evident I dont understand >something, >unless it means compared to distance. i.e. if you are close enough you can >get >54mbs at 12dbm but it takes 17 to get you 6 to 24 at a further distance? >Is this just a static statistic? http://www.colubris.com/files/CN320%20Datasheet.pdf You'll find that almost all the FCC type certification reports have different power levels at different data rates. In general the higher data rates cause the signal to be splattered over a slightly wider frequency bandwidth resulting to lower average power levels. The higher speeds are also belching tx power for shorter xmit times than those at lower speeds. There's also the problem of making the xmit AGC (automagic gain control) deliver constant output at all modulation types and speeds. T'is not easy. Looking at some random FCC type certification test reports, the power output seems to drop about 3dB from 6Mbits/sec OFDM down to 54Mbits/sec OFDM. Also, not that the Colubris specs allow a +/- 2dB variation. That's about what the accumulated AGC and watts-guesser accuracy yields. For calculating the range, you need to also consider the receiver sensitivity which varies considerably with modulation type and speed. The following was lifted from the DI-624 datasheet but is close enough for most similar 802.11g radios: * 54Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -68dBm) * 48Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -68dBm) * 36Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -75dBm) * 24Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -79dBm) * 18Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -82dBm) * 12Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -84dBm) * 11Mbps CCK, 8% PER, -82dBm) * 9Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -87dBm) * 6Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -88dBm) * 5.5Mbps CCK, 8% PER, -85dBm) * 2Mbps QPSK, 8% PER, -86dBm) * 1Mbps BPSK, 8% PER, -89dBm) That's a -20dB drop in sensitivity between 6Mbit/sec OFDM and 54Mbit/sec OFDM. Adding that to the 3dB loss in xmit average power, we get a 23dB difference. At 6dB equals half the range, for a 23dB difference, we get about 1/16 the range at 54Mbits/sec as we would at 6Mbits/sec. Yeah, speed and distance can be traded. -- Jeff Liebermann je***@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558
Show quote
Hide quote
> >While comparing some products I have ran across this a few times You are correct.and dont > >really understand > >the concept. Below is one example > > > >Product Specifications: > > > >17 dbm at 6 to 24mbs; > >12 dbm at 54mbs > > > >Seems to me it would be opposite but its evident I dont understand > >something, > >unless it means compared to distance. i.e. if you are close enough you can > >get > >54mbs at 12dbm but it takes 17 to get you 6 to 24 at a further distance? > >Is this just a static statistic? > > I guess you mean the tx power spec at: > http://www.colubris.com/files/CN320%20Datasheet.pdf Show quoteHide quote > You'll find that almost all the FCC type certification reports have That makes sense.> different power levels at different data rates. In general the higher > data rates cause the signal to be splattered over a slightly wider > frequency bandwidth resulting to lower average power levels. The > higher speeds are also belching tx power for shorter xmit times than > those at lower speeds. There's also the problem of making the xmit > AGC (automagic gain control) deliver constant output at all modulation > types and speeds. T'is not easy. Looking at some random FCC type > certification test reports, the power output seems to drop about 3dB > from 6Mbits/sec OFDM down to 54Mbits/sec OFDM. Also, not that the > Colubris specs allow a +/- 2dB variation. That's about what the > accumulated AGC and watts-guesser accuracy yields. Show quoteHide quote > For calculating the range, you need to also consider the receiver In the case of the Colubris 802.11G the receive sensity is -65dbm at> sensitivity which varies considerably with modulation type and speed. > The following was lifted from the DI-624 datasheet but is close enough > for most similar 802.11g radios: > * 54Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -68dBm) > * 48Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -68dBm) > * 36Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -75dBm) > * 24Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -79dBm) > * 18Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -82dBm) > * 12Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -84dBm) > * 11Mbps CCK, 8% PER, -82dBm) > * 9Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -87dBm) > * 6Mbps OFDM, 10% PER, -88dBm) > * 5.5Mbps CCK, 8% PER, -85dBm) > * 2Mbps QPSK, 8% PER, -86dBm) > * 1Mbps BPSK, 8% PER, -89dBm) > That's a -20dB drop in sensitivity between 6Mbit/sec OFDM and > 54Mbit/sec OFDM. Adding that to the 3dB loss in xmit average power, > we get a 23dB difference. At 6dB equals half the range, for a 23dB > difference, we get about 1/16 the range at 54Mbits/sec as we would at > 6Mbits/sec. Yeah, speed and distance can be traded. -- > Jeff Liebermann je***@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us > 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com > Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558 54mbs and -85dbm at 6mbs. a -20dbm difference just like your above chart. The Xmit power for 6-24mbs is 17dbm and 11.5dbm for 54mbs. A difference of -6.5dbm. Now Im curious as to how I benefit by knowing this, other than calculating a link budget where I need 54mbs throughout the link or is it useful for something else? Forever learning! As always thanks for your valuable insight!!
Operating Wi-Fi Security in large corporations
Wireless internet but no LAN Strong connection but no ping Setup Belkin 802.11g Wireless card with Bigpond ADSL Kit? Wireless access point problems... HELP PLEASE --- Lost wireless connection on Belkin access points upstairs to down Are some wifi ADSL modem routers not compatible with australian broadband services??? Can Wireless Adapters Conflict? IP Conflict on WiFi |
|||||||||||||||||||||||