|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IP Conflict on WiFi
I am a wireless Inetrnet Service provider in Mysore India. I have presently 2 AP independently connected to the net by OFC with central server running on DHCP. At a particular point in the town both the AP's are accessable. If I put up Bridge (LAN IP 192.xxx...) and power on it with any AP SSID there will be a conflict on the network on IP address and the other subscribers get "Request Time Out" and slow Internet access. I have tried changing the hardware but no joy. Plez help me. shanks
Show quote
Hide quote
"Terminator" <sha***@sharvani.net> wrote in are both APs using the same IP address - 192.168.1.254?news:37u19fF5h2uctU1@individual.net: > Dear Friends, > > I am a wireless Inetrnet Service provider in Mysore India. I have > presently 2 AP independently connected to the net by OFC with central > server running on DHCP. > > At a particular point in the town both the AP's are accessable. If I > put up Bridge (LAN IP 192.xxx...) and power on it with any AP SSID > there will be a conflict on the network on IP address and the other > subscribers get "Request Time Out" and slow Internet access. I have > tried changing the hardware but no joy. > > Plez help me. > > shanks > > > Terminator wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > Dear Friends, If both are DH* servers, try setting them to 100 addresses allocated, the > > I am a wireless Inetrnet Service provider in Mysore India. I have > presently 2 AP independently connected to the net by OFC with central > server running on DHCP. > > At a particular point in the town both the AP's are accessable. If I > put up Bridge (LAN IP 192.xxx...) and power on it with any AP SSID > there will be a conflict on the network on IP address and the other > subscribers get "Request Time Out" and slow Internet access. I have > tried changing the hardware but no joy. > > Plez help me. > > shanks first starting at .50 and the second at .150 (IE so the address range isn't duplicated when addresses are given out) No both AP's are not on DHCP but on static transparent IP's 10.10.xxx.
Connecting to a server running a DHCP service but allocating real ip's (61.7.xxx). The bridge, no matter what IP is allocated for the LAN side causes a IP conflict. shanks Terminator wrote:
> No both AP's are not on DHCP but on static transparent IP's 10.10.xxx. So, how about telling us a little more about your setup?> Connecting to a server running a DHCP service but allocating real ip's > (61.7.xxx). The bridge, no matter what IP is allocated for the LAN side > causes a IP conflict. > > shanks - IP addresses and netmasks of all components - DHCP ranges - physical network structure - static routes - ... Thomas The network has 2 AP's both are independently connected to the Net from the
server via Fibre Optic Cable. The server runs on Linux with DHCP range of 255 real IP's (61.7.65.1 255). Each AP has a LAN IP of 10.10.10.1 /255.255.255.0. Both AP's has different SSID. All bridges and Wifiy PCI cards are working fine except one bridge. This one is Radio accessable to both the AP's, no matter whatever bridge I put, the moment I put the bridge the network goes down and there is a clash of IP. The bridge has a LAN IP of 192.168.1.x / 255.255.255.0 for local administration. The server has MAC authentication and AP's are not authenticated since they are transparent. The Bridge and the NIC are both authenticated. (Should I?). shanks
Wireless internet but no LAN
Strong connection but no ping Error trying to set-up static DHCP on Dlink DI-524 wireless router MAC filter problem / incompatibility? Setup Belkin 802.11g Wireless card with Bigpond ADSL Kit? Wireless access point problems... HELP PLEASE --- Lost wireless connection on Belkin access points upstairs to down linksys srx vs Belkin Wireless Pre-N wireless router? Are some wifi ADSL modem routers not compatible with australian broadband services??? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||