|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Parabolic reflector for Wi-Fi?
found quite a few sources, such as: http://www.genericgeek.com/index.php?q=node/280 http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template2/index.html Those I've found all give templates for a parabola, but without any explanation as to why they have chosen that *particular* shaped parabola. As a result, the drawings are a bit "sketchy". I'd like to know a bit more theory, and the pros and cons of various parabolic shapes. -- Nigel M "Occam's razor is not always sharp" On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:22:57 GMT, Nigel M <re***@thegroup.com> wrote:
>I've been looking to make a linear parabolic reflector for Wi-Fi, I've For a parabola to work at maximum theoretical gain (based on aperture>found quite a few sources, such as: > >http://www.genericgeek.com/index.php?q=node/280 > >http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template2/index.html > >Those I've found all give templates for a parabola, but without any >explanation as to why they have chosen that *particular* shaped >parabola. As a result, the drawings are a bit "sketchy". size and feed efficiency), you have to be within about 1/10th of a wavelength accuracy. That's about +/- 1.25cm. You can build it much sloppier, but the achievable gain and pattern will suffer. The feed is also critical as you don't want too wide a pattern resulting in "overspray" which reduces xmit gain, or too small a pattern that illuminates only part of the dish, resulting in low receive gain. I short, you need to match the feed type with the f/D ratio of the dish. >I'd like to know a bit more theory, and the pros and cons of various The best source of dish and feed info is at:>parabolic shapes. http://www.qsl.net/n1bwt/contents.htm If you're gonna grind your own antennas, I strongly suggest you get a modeling program. I suggest 4NEC2 ver 5.5.0 from: http://www.si-list.org/swindex2.html Drivel: If you just wanna improve the signal in very roughly one direction, just chop a 5gal poly-something food bucket in half, coat half the inside with aluminium foil, dump your access point on the bottom, and you have an instant hemispherical reflector. Not even close to ideal, but still useful. -- Jeff Liebermann je***@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558 Simple A4 card covered in foil and bent in the middle at 60 deg. does a good
job. Regards, Martin
Show quote
Hide quote
"Nigel M" <re***@thegroup.com> wrote in message Nigelnews:8go0415fkkvr26ktuefhuo4djlugeq2ehf@4ax.com... > I've been looking to make a linear parabolic reflector for Wi-Fi, I've > found quite a few sources, such as: > > http://www.genericgeek.com/index.php?q=node/280 > > http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template2/index.html > > Those I've found all give templates for a parabola, but without any > explanation as to why they have chosen that *particular* shaped > parabola. As a result, the drawings are a bit "sketchy". > > I'd like to know a bit more theory, and the pros and cons of various > parabolic shapes. > > > -- > Nigel M > "Occam's razor is not always sharp" I would imagine the reflections of the signal follow the rules of optics if you look up optics on how to focus a light bulb, I would think that's how its done but its not necessary a parabolic reflector just convex in one plane ( half a tube) bear in mind light reflects off a mirror at the same angle as it hits form this you could work out what shape is ideal, but I dont think its that critical and its not rocket science. Please don't get stroppy but who is Occam, by the way? MikeS In alt.internet.wireless, MikeS wrote:
>Please don't get stroppy but who is Occam, by the way? See: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor>My assertion is that quite often it's the more complex explanations that are correct. -- Nigel M "Occam's razor is not always sharp" Thanks Nigel,
You lean something every on the net. Regards MikeS Show quoteHide quote "Nigel M" <re***@thegroup.com> wrote in message news:cjs24111h65n0anij00fnh8ns402hseu7l@4ax.com... > In alt.internet.wireless, MikeS wrote: > >>Please don't get stroppy but who is Occam, by the way? > > See: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_Razor> > > My assertion is that quite often it's the more complex explanations that > are correct. > > > -- > Nigel M > "Occam's razor is not always sharp"
802.11b/g problems for apartment dwellers
WRE54G Range Expander questions on linksys webinterface options Excessive "Invalid misc"?? 900 Mhz phone? I can't find the IP of mine Access Point SMA Bulkead - tryiong to find on solwise - help Linksys BEFW11S4 firmware? can wireless bridge slow internet speed? www.freeantennas.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||