|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Wireless access point problems...
We added a WAP54G to our office to accommodate customers who come in & need to use their laptops. We're using WEP & have broadcasting turned on. We have a DHCP server on the LAN to pass out IP addresses to customers & customers laptops are set to get a dhcp address. Anyone who works here & has a domain account can log in to the domain, get an IP address & everything works fine. Anyone else can't. What's happening is if you place the curser over the network tray, it will say "Connected to 'wireless_network', signal strength excellent", but computer is getting a 169.254.x.x address. I actually had one laptop get a dhcp address, after the computer had been on about 15 minutes, but couldn't connect to or ping anything. Am I missing something here? After getting a few replies, I've turned WEP off, turned on broadcasting & I can get an IP address via a DHCP server on our network, but I can't get on the Internet! DHCP is set to pass out gateway address & dns server info. The DNS seerver is passes out is our internal dns server which forwards to our ISPs dns servers. If I try to ping anything on our network, it times out. I can try to ping a server by name & it will come back with "pinging server1 [192.168.10.200]...", but will time out! I can ping external (real world) IP addresses & get a reply, but can't ping websites by name. If I try to connect to a network share, whether by mapping a network drive (while connecting with a domain account & password), or via run>\\Server1\share, I get a "Network path can't be found". Any advice appreciated- On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:32:02 GMT, "Mike" <mikey***@hotmail.com> wrote: Use tracerouter (or Windoze tracert) to guess where the packets are>After getting a few replies, I've turned WEP off, turned on broadcasting & I >can get an IP address via a DHCP server on our network, but I can't get on >the Internet! going. Also, dump the Windoze route table with: route print | more to see where your DHCP server is telling the clients to go. >DHCP is set to pass out gateway address & dns server info. Ok. Are these being delivered correctly? Use:ipconfig to see what you're getting from the DHCP server. Incidentally, any chance this DHCP server is a Windoze 2003 server? If so, there is a rather complex security pretzel available that assigns temporary IP addresses to DHCP clients that work only long enough for them to be authenticated by the PDC. I won't pretend to understand how to configure it. >The That's normal. Do your initial troubleshooting by IP address, not by>DNS seerver is passes out is our internal dns server which forwards to our >ISPs dns servers. name. For example, to surf the web, use: http://IP-address-of-web-server instead of the usual web server name and domain. >If I try to ping anything on our network, it times out. Anything? Try the wireless access point IP address, the router IPaddress, and whatever you're using for DHCP server. Also try pinging your own assigned IP address. See if there's a pattern. I had one of my friends waste an entire day trying to troubleshoot an internal static route problem that turned out to be forgetting to disarm or configure an exception in his laptops Norton Firewall. >I Stop testing by name. Is 192.168.10.200 the IP address of this>can try to ping a server by name & it will come back with "pinging server1 >[192.168.10.200]...", but will time out! server? If so, try pinging it by IP address. If that fails, run: tracert 192.168.10.200 to see where the packets are trying to go. If that fails, then run: route print | more and see where your client wants to send packets. >I can ping external (real world) IP Ok, so now we get down to the problem. You're nameservice is busted>addresses & get a reply, but can't ping websites by name. If I try to >connect to a network share, whether by mapping a network drive (while >connecting with a domain account & password), or via run>\\Server1\share, I >get a "Network path can't be found". or malfunctional. In the future, please start with the problem you're trying to solve and add the evidence after that, not the reverse order. It makes easier reading. Instead of \\Server1 which should deliver a list of available shares, try running: \\192.168.10.200 which should do that same thing. If that works, your DNS is busted. Assuming a Windoze system, I use Sam Spade to troubleshoot DNS problems. For Unix, try "host", "dig", and "dnslookup" commands. http://www.samspade.org/ssw/download.html Download and install. You can get a really good idea of how a lookup works by using the "dig" button. Under "options -> miscellaneous" turn on "query all authoritative servers" to get buried in troubleshooting info. I don't know what's wrong with your DNS, but I can offer a guess(tm) based on past experience. ISP's like to change DNS server IP's. Your in house DNS server might have an old IP address. Also, I've seen admins populate the server hosts files with static name-IP pairs to speed up common lookups. See if there's anything odd in hosts and lmhosts. -- Jeff Liebermann je***@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558 For starters, yes, this is a Windows 2003 server.
All settings under ipconfig /all are correct. These are the same
settings on all other client computers & dns, etc., works fine on them.
Where might I start on that "rather complex security pretzel" as far as
2003 is concerned?
This would also explain alot of the "well, it used to work" statements
that I've been hearing.
Jeez! Windows 2003 is really looking like more trouble that it was
worth!
--
mikey117
brought to you by http://www.wifi-forum.com/
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:59:08 GMT, mikey117
<mikey117.1lhptn@WiFi-Forum_dot_com> wrote: >For starters, yes, this is a Windows 2003 server. I'll add another notch in my keyboard for astute guesswork.>All settings under ipconfig /all are correct. These are the same OK. Methinks we're on the right track. Did you run the DNS test to>settings on all other client computers & dns, etc., works fine on them. see if it's even able to do a DNS lookup? My guess is that the lookups will fail do to the inability to access the DNS servers on the internet. >Where might I start on that "rather complex security pretzel" as far as Notice that I indicated that I didn't know anything about Windoze>2003 is concerned? >This would also explain alot of the "well, it used to work" statements >that I've been hearing. 2003. One of my customers ladyfriend is the admin at a local manufactory that uses Windoze 2003. That entitled me to helping her setup a Netgear something VPN router with a Windoze 2003 server delivering all the IP addresses via DHCP. The symptoms were identical. DHCP would deliver a valid IP address through the VPN, but nothing would work until after one authenticated with the server. Since I wasn't present and didn't even look at the Windoze 2003 server, I really don't know what to tell you. I'll dive back into some of the email to see if there are any useful clues. >Jeez! Windows 2003 is really looking like more trouble that it was No sympathy. It's a feature, not a bug.>worth! Personally, I think it's a nifty idea. Deliver a useless IP address so that the client can authenticate and don't let them do anything useful until the PDC says it's ok. A good way to do security. Methinks it's worth doing battle with Windoze 2003 to make this thing work. Digging through my email, I found: (...) The problem was not with the Netgear it was the W2K3 Domain Server. 2K3 routing and remote access server was confused as to who was assigning IP address to the remote computers. The W2K3 server was set up to let the Netgear assign IP addresses for both internal and remote computers. Since I could not figure out how to get the Netgear assign IP address for remote computers (I played with all the possible number fields), I found in the routing and remote access server settings to let our network server assign the remote IP addresses (I used a different IP scheme for the remote computers). It's not exactly the same issue, but it might be a clue. She also mentions a page on the Windoze 2003 server that limits access by a range of IP address. It's usually set to allow the entire /24 IP block, but might be limited for some reason. -- Jeff Liebermann je***@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558
Building To Building
Wireless-wired-wireless re-radiator belkin pre-n report Problems with a Netgear wireless router Router problem Home network and PDA access file & printer sharing XP ICS wit netgear DG834GT router ? both wired and wireless routers in series WAP11 HW ver 2.6 SNMP management possible ? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||