|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
WEP 128 versus 64
from 128. Just out of interest, what is the process overhead of having WEP enabled i.e in simple terms, how are the packets of data encrypted with WEP key. Is it a big overhead. Paul Go with 128, some cards and routers don't even have 64 anymore: that means
something, innit? pa***@fsmail.net wrote: Show quoteHide quote > Just wondered how much gain in throughput I'd get by dropping to WEP64 > from 128. > > Just out of interest, what is the process overhead of having WEP > enabled i.e in simple terms, how are the packets of data encrypted > with WEP key. Is it a big overhead. > > Paul "Steffo" <steffo@nospam.com> wrote in There should be no (or minimal) processing overhead in using WEP news:422787c6$1_3@news.bluewin.ch: > Go with 128, some cards and routers don't even have 64 anymore: > that means something, innit? > > pa***@fsmail.net wrote: >> Just wondered how much gain in throughput I'd get by dropping to >> WEP64 from 128. >> >> Just out of interest, what is the process overhead of having WEP >> enabled i.e in simple terms, how are the packets of data >> encrypted with WEP key. Is it a big overhead. encryption with a 64 or 128 bit key. The encryption is done at hardware level in the wireless chipset. There is an overhead of 4 bytes per packet for ciphertext (encrypted) data over plaintext (non- encrypted) data. If you want a reasonable overview of WEP encryption have a look here: <http://developer.intel.com/technology/itj/q22000/articles/art_5.htm> [Aside: This article has some confused language about authentication, although the message is there if you read carefully: WEP with Open System authentication is more secure than Shared Key] Note that WPA uses the same RC4 encryption algorithm as WEP, but the way the key and message integrity are handled is different. The use of the same encryption is because it is done at the hardware level, and otherwise would involve a hardware change. This hardware change will be necessary for WPA2 encryption using AES - again, the computationally intensive encryption is done at hardware level, and only recent wireless chipsets include the necessary algorithms. Hope this helps -- Richard Perkin To email me, change the AT in the address below richard.perkinATmyrealbox.com It's is not, it isn't ain't, and it's it's, not its, if you mean it is. If you don't, it's its. Then too, it's hers. It isn't her's. It isn't our's either. It's ours, and likewise yours and theirs. -- Oxford University Press, Edpress News <pa***@fsmail.net> wrote in message
news:1109884147.130074.32190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... Any encryption takes time and processing power and 128 takes more than> Just wondered how much gain in throughput I'd get by dropping to WEP64 > from 128. > > Just out of interest, what is the process overhead of having WEP > enabled i.e in simple terms, how are the packets of data encrypted with > WEP key. Is it a big overhead. 64. If someone really wants to crack you it makes no difference which one you use. pa***@fsmail.net wrote:
> Just wondered how much gain in throughput I'd get by dropping to WEP64 Nothing, the encrytiong work the same way only the keystrem is generated> from 128. from a short initial value. And the keystrem is always as long as the data you send. Thomas <pa***@fsmail.net> wrote in message
news:1109884147.130074.32190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... For grins I ran a throughput test with both.> Just wondered how much gain in throughput I'd get by dropping to WEP64 > from 128. > > Just out of interest, what is the process overhead of having WEP > enabled i.e in simple terms, how are the packets of data encrypted with > WEP key. Is it a big overhead. 64 wep decreased throughput by an average of 7.9% 128 wep decreased throughput by an average of 9.7% Just a 1.8% difference.. Not enough to worry about.
Check signal using DWL-810+ ?
chaining routers: need a fixed IP? Simplest wireless configuration for this home network? Advice needed on connecting my neighbour to my wireless setup. Base >> repeater >> client Do Additional Users of Wireless Router Signal Affect Signal? own hot spot WiMAX setup WEP and XP problems; VPN Client Hangs When I Sleep/Resume My Win 2k Dell Latitude D400 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||