|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Camcorder RecommendationI'm trying to buy a camcorder in the $500 range and am wondering if I should
go hard drive/Mini DV/DVD or another option. It seems like hard drive would be the easiest to deal with but it looks like there are compression issues that could make it not the best choice. I'm primarily looking for the camcorder that will provide the best image. Recommendations would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Barry "Sanbar" <san***@wi.rr.com> wrote in message A google search would save everyone a lot of time, as this has been news:45c12140$0$5772$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > I'm trying to buy a camcorder in the $500 range and am wondering if I > should go hard drive/Mini DV/DVD or another option. It seems like hard > drive would be the easiest to deal with but it looks like there are > compression issues that could make it not the best choice. > > I'm primarily looking for the camcorder that will provide the best image. > Recommendations would be appreciated. > > Thanks in advance. > > Barry discussed a lot. Short version: miniDV will give you much better video quality than either a hard disk or DVD machine. Show quoteHide quote > PTravel wrote:
> Short version: miniDV will give you much better video quality than Not to mention that - when compared to HDD camcorders - it also solves > either a hard disk or DVD machine. the archival problem. -- znark "Jukka Aho" <jukka.***@iki.fi> wrote in message I'm looking at the Panasonic PVGS300. If anyone could throw in a few other news:RYawh.1364$z61.388@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi... > PTravel wrote: > >> Short version: miniDV will give you much better video quality than >> either a hard disk or DVD machine. > > Not to mention that - when compared to HDD camcorders - it also solves the > archival problem. > > -- > znark models to look at it would be appreciate.
Show quote
Hide quote
On Feb 1, 1:19 pm, "Sanbar" <san***@wi.rr.com> wrote: Hmmm.> "Jukka Aho" <jukka.***@iki.fi> wrote in message > > news:RYawh.1364$z61.388@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi... > > >PTravelwrote: > > >> Short version: miniDV will give you much better video quality than > >> either a hard disk or DVD machine. > > > Not to mention that - when compared to HDD camcorders - it also solves the > > archival problem. > > > -- > > znark > > I'm looking at the Panasonic PVGS300. If anyone could throw in a few other > models to look at it would be appreciate. Again, I'd recommend a google search. In short: As a rule, 3-ccd machines will produce better video than single-ccd machines, as they generally have better color saturation, lower noise and better low-light sensitivity. Panasonic realized that a lot of potential camera purchasers knew this, and came out with a line of cheap 3-ccd machines, not because the video was great, but as a marketing tool. The PVGS300 uses 1/6" ccds -- these are tiny. The smaller the ccd, the poorer the low-light sensitivity and the higher the video noise. Though the Panny may do okay in bright sunlight (and virtually any camcorder will), it does dismally in low-light. There is no comparison between the Panny and a "true" 3-ccd machine like a VX2100, which uses 1/3" ccds and can produce gorgeous, noise-free, saturated video under the most challenging conditions. Unfortunately, the VX2100 costs 3 times as much as the PVGS300, but there's a reason -- it produces video of the highest quality. The Panny doesn't. Rule of thumb: get the biggest CCD you can (1/3" or 1/4" is far preferable to 1/5" or 1/6"), get the _lowest_ pixel density you can (this may be counterintuitive, but in low-cost camcorders high-density pixels are used to enable crappy still photography and actually degrade both video quality and low-light sensitivity), get the best lens quality you can (ignore digital zoom as it's meaningless and just produces horribly degraded video, and remember that no one can handhold zoom ranges above 10x to 12x), and avoid silly and unnecessary gimmicks (Bluetooth, ability to email video, built-in special effects, etc.). Sony and Canon both make reasonably-good mid-priced camcorders, though I couldn't suggest any specific models. The best thing to do is determine how you're going to use the machine (e.g., travel video and amateur music video production will have radically different requirements than shooting the kid's birthday parties to send to grandma and grandpa). Only you know what will be "good enough" for your purposes. Then, go to a brick-and-mortar store that has a good selection, and try different camcorders hands on. Stores are good places to test camcorders because they're mid- to low-light, which is when a camcorder's abilities are really tested. Is the picture bright and saturated? Grainy and washed out? Does the autofocus "hunt" or lock in quickly? How effective is the image stabilization (next to lighting, shake is the significant factor distinguishes lousy amateur video from more professional-looking work)? How's the lens? Test it by zooming in on a high contrast subject an looking for blue and/or red fringes around the edges, as well as an overall loss of contrast at the higher zoom ranges. Don't judge by the image in the viewfinder or on the LCD; record some video and play it back through a monitor to see what the camcorder can really do.
Show quote
Hide quote
"Sanbar" <san***@wi.rr.com> wrote in message Canon Elura 100 is somewhat cheaper but a decent performer. I would alsonews:45c25970$0$5247$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > > "Jukka Aho" <jukka.***@iki.fi> wrote in message > news:RYawh.1364$z61.388@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi... > > PTravel wrote: > > > >> Short version: miniDV will give you much better video quality than > >> either a hard disk or DVD machine. > > > > Not to mention that - when compared to HDD camcorders - it also solves the > > archival problem. > > > > -- > > znark > > > I'm looking at the Panasonic PVGS300. If anyone could throw in a few other > models to look at it would be appreciate. > suggest that if you plan to shoot a lot of hand-held video, that you make sure you are comfortable holding the camcorder for extended periods. It's not like a still camera where most of your shots will be individual ones with lengthy time period in between shots. If the feel of the camera in your hand for minutes at a time is unpleasant, then no matter what the image quality, shooting your video will be a pain and not a joy.
Show quote
Hide quote
"iws" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message Thanks for everyone's help. I've been out of video for about 20 years. I news:_lzwh.58047$sE7.19014@newsfe21.lga... > "Sanbar" <san***@wi.rr.com> wrote in message > news:45c25970$0$5247$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... >> >> "Jukka Aho" <jukka.***@iki.fi> wrote in message >> news:RYawh.1364$z61.388@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi... >> > PTravel wrote: >> > >> >> Short version: miniDV will give you much better video quality than >> >> either a hard disk or DVD machine. >> > >> > Not to mention that - when compared to HDD camcorders - it also solves > the >> > archival problem. >> > >> > -- >> > znark >> >> >> I'm looking at the Panasonic PVGS300. If anyone could throw in a few >> other >> models to look at it would be appreciate. >> > Canon Elura 100 is somewhat cheaper but a decent performer. I would also > suggest that if you plan to shoot a lot of hand-held video, that you make > sure you are comfortable holding the camcorder for extended periods. It's > not like a still camera where most of your shots will be individual ones > with lengthy time period in between shots. If the feel of the camera in > your > hand for minutes at a time is unpleasant, then no matter what the image > quality, shooting your video will be a pain and not a joy. > used to do professional video production back when Betacam was all the rage and 3/4" was considered a decent format. Obviously things have changed quite a bit since then. I'm really only looking for a camcorder that will record my family moments but still want to get the best bang for the buck. Obviously, getting a knowledgeable salesperson from Best Buy or Circuit City is unlikely so I came here. With my background and also my background in high end audio recording I fully understand how people don't want to see me waste money on low end junk, but that's probably where I'm headed on this one. From the reseach I've done it looks like the Panasonic PVGS300 is one of the best in $500 price point. I'm looking mostly for quality and not features. If anyone would like to throw out the short list in this price range I would be most appreciative. Again, thanks for the replies. Barry
Show quote
Hide quote
Ï "Sanbar" <san***@wi.rr.com> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá I must add, check that the camcorder you buy is made in japan.It's a toonews:45c34822$0$4849$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > > "iws" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:_lzwh.58047$sE7.19014@newsfe21.lga... > > "Sanbar" <san***@wi.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:45c25970$0$5247$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... > >> > >> "Jukka Aho" <jukka.***@iki.fi> wrote in message > >> news:RYawh.1364$z61.388@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi... > >> > PTravel wrote: > >> > > >> >> Short version: miniDV will give you much better video quality than > >> >> either a hard disk or DVD machine. > >> > > >> > Not to mention that - when compared to HDD camcorders - it also solves > > the > >> > archival problem. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > znark > >> > >> > >> I'm looking at the Panasonic PVGS300. If anyone could throw in a few > >> other > >> models to look at it would be appreciate. > >> > > Canon Elura 100 is somewhat cheaper but a decent performer. I would also > > suggest that if you plan to shoot a lot of hand-held video, that you make > > sure you are comfortable holding the camcorder for extended periods. It's > > not like a still camera where most of your shots will be individual ones > > with lengthy time period in between shots. If the feel of the camera in > > your > > hand for minutes at a time is unpleasant, then no matter what the image > > quality, shooting your video will be a pain and not a joy. > > > > Thanks for everyone's help. I've been out of video for about 20 years. I > used to do professional video production back when Betacam was all the rage > and 3/4" was considered a decent format. Obviously things have changed quite > a bit since then. I'm really only looking for a camcorder that will record > my family moments but still want to get the best bang for the buck. > Obviously, getting a knowledgeable salesperson from Best Buy or Circuit City > is unlikely so I came here. With my background and also my background in > high end audio recording I fully understand how people don't want to see me > waste money on low end junk, but that's probably where I'm headed on this > one. > > From the reseach I've done it looks like the Panasonic PVGS300 is one of the > best in $500 price point. I'm looking mostly for quality and not features. > If anyone would like to throw out the short list in this price range I would > be most appreciative. delicate and complicated piece of engineering, so better safe than sorry.Of course, it's difficult to get an unbiased opinion on a camcorder, because everyone will think the best is their own!On the other hand, mine (sony dcr hc 32 e)is quite a bang for the buck, bought it 350 euros (normally it cost at least 420 euros, it was the one on display so hence the discount)has 800 k pixel HAD ccd,carl zeiss lens, mini dv, spot photo metering, spot focusing, manual white balance and lot of gimmicks that would make a seminar on the use of the camera reasonable.It can take still photos at 640*480, which is quite an advantage, because making a megapixel 1/6 " sensor is no easy game... Hope this helps, -- Tzortzakakis Dimitrios major in electrical engineering mechanized infantry reservist dimtzort AT otenet DOT gr
Other interesting topics
Q: Is Digital over-the-air reception worse than Analog?
Splitting a Video composite signal Canon L1 Help Record to your hard drive and burn to DVD in one camcorder How Are Old Black-and-White Movies Colorized? Advice please re: prof. camcorders Video Editing Lag Time... How to create a short clip from a .VOD file? Help: View Video In? PAL DVD in Canada? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||