Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Moving Overseas - Multisystem TV vs. Video Converter

Author
12 Nov 2006 3:28 AM
Charles Goodman
I'm moving from the US to Argentina in December and will be in another
country (don't know which yet) in 2 years as a result of my job.  I've been
wrestling with the need to buy a multisystem TV vs. just a video converter.
I've got a relatively new LCD TV that I'd rather not toss and the
multisystem TVs seem quite expensive...probably just a result of limited
resellers.

I plan on either getting cable or satellite TV, so I should have a digital
"box".  I also like to watch DVDs.  I'll probably mainly use Netflix (I'll
have access to an APO/FPO for delivery), but I'd like the option of
renting/buying local DVDs too, so I'll probably buy a region free player.

As I understand it, if I've got a cable or satellite box, then I only need
to worry about converting the format (PAL to NTSC).  If I'm not pulling TV
off an antennae, then I don't see what a multisystem TV would really get me.
Am I missing anything?  Are there any other reasons (in my situation) to
consider a multisystem TV?

Assuming I'm right, and a video converter is the way to go for me, can
anyone recommend a top-notch converter?  Ports, video quality and number of
formats supported will all be important to me.

Thanks a lot for any help/advice.

Best regards,
Charles Goodman

Author
14 Nov 2006 12:18 AM
Jukka Aho
Charles Goodman wrote:

> I'm moving from the US to Argentina in December and will be in another
> country (don't know which yet) in 2 years as a result of my job.

For some reason (Digital divide? Language barrier?) people from South
America seem to be underrepresented here. From time to time someone asks
technical questions about the somewhat peculiar tv broadcast standards
used in South American countries such as Brazil and Argentina, but is
often met with silence, or will only get some stray comments and
guesswork from people living in other countries.

This post falls in the latter category: I'm posting from Europe, living
in a PAL B/G country (which is about to become a 576i/25 [625/50] DVB
country next year) and I've never even set my foot on the continent of
South America.

> I've been wrestling with the need to buy a multisystem TV vs. just a
> video converter. I've got a relatively new LCD TV that I'd rather not
> toss and the multisystem TVs seem quite expensive...probably just a
> result of limited resellers.

As this is South America we're talking about, you need to be careful
about tv standards. Even though PAL color encoding _usually_ implies a
625-line 50 Hz raster scanning standard, some South American countries
use PAL color encoding in combination with an NTSC-style 525-line 59.94
Hz raster. When weighing your options, the local raster scanning
standard is what makes the main difference. Color encoding formats (PAL
to NTSC, or vice versa) can be easily converted, but converting from one
raster scanning standard to the other (625/50 to 525/59.94, or vice
versa) is difficult, and will almost always significantly degrade the
image quality (especially if you only have "domestic" standards
conversion equipment at your disposal, and not something like the Snell
& Wilcox Alchemist Ph.C.)

As it turns out, the PAL-N broadcast standard, as used in Argentina, is
a 625-line 50 Hz format. In other words, different from what is used in
the US, and what your current tv set will accept. Hence, conversion with
good quality is pretty much out of the question. You can get a watchable
picture by using a domestic PAL-to-NTSC standards converter, but it will
have motion artifacts (such as motion judder) and/or it will be blurrier
than the original - especially for any part of the image where there is
motion.

> I plan on either getting cable or satellite TV, so I should have a
> digital "box".  I also like to watch DVDs.  I'll probably mainly use
> Netflix (I'll have access to an APO/FPO for delivery), but I'd like
> the option of renting/buying local DVDs too, so I'll probably buy a
> region free player.
> As I understand it, if I've got a cable or satellite box, then I only
> need to worry about converting the format (PAL to NTSC).  If I'm not
> pulling TV off an antennae, then I don't see what a multisystem TV
> would really get me. Am I missing anything?  Are there any other
> reasons (in my situation) to consider a multisystem TV?

As discussed above, any (domestic) conversion from a 625-line 50 Hz
system to a 525-line 59.94 Hz system will introduce motion artifacts
and/or blurriness, and therefore reduce the image quality. This
reduction in image quality will happen regardless of whether the
original 625/50 signal came from an antenna or from a set-top box.

A multistandard tv set would benefit you by displaying both raster
scanning formats natively, without this reduction in quality.

* * *

Note that in Europe and Australia - both 625/50 PAL(/SECAM)
territories - multistandard tv sets have become the norm over the last
15 years. Even though the NTSC color encoding standard or the 525/59.94
raster scanning format are not used for local tv broadcasts, video
rentals, prerecorded DVD/VHS sales, or camcorders, people have lots of
connections to NTSC countries, and will occasionally want to view
NTSC-formatted VHS tapes or DVDs (for example, home videos from
relatives, or obscure indie movies ordered from overseas.)

It is possible that a similar development has also happened in Argentina
and in other South American 625/50 countries. That wouldn't be too
surprising, especially considering that the NTSC broadcast standard and
525/59.94 raster scanning is used in many surrounding South American
countries, and the border areas of neighboring countries can probably
receive each others' broadcasts. For instance, Argentina shares a long
border with Peru, which is an NTSC-M country. Argentina is also likely
to receive lots of satellite broadcasts in 525/59.94 format. There's
probably just as much (if not more!) genuine need for NTSC or 525/59.94
support in Argentina than in Europe and Australia.

If this speculation turns out to be true, you might want to check out
what kind of tv sets are available locally. Perhaps, in the best case,
you will find out they're more or less all NTSC-compatible, and could
find a nice NTSC-compatible set that you could bring back with you to
the US. The selection, in that case, could also be better than in the
US, where multistandard sets are not generally available in Walmart and
the like.

* * *

Whichever way you decide about this, you will need a voltage converter,
since Argentina, according to the Internet, is a 220 V 50 Hz country.
(Unless you manage to find a set that is multistandard with voltages,
too.)

--
znark
Are all your drivers up to date? click for free checkup

Author
14 Nov 2006 5:44 PM
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
Show quote Hide quote
? "Jukka Aho" <jukka.***@iki.fi> ?????? ??? ??????
news:fX76h.51634$V04.37011@reader1.news.jippii.net...
> Charles Goodman wrote:
>
> > I'm moving from the US to Argentina in December and will be in another
> > country (don't know which yet) in 2 years as a result of my job.
>
> For some reason (Digital divide? Language barrier?) people from South
> America seem to be underrepresented here. From time to time someone asks
> technical questions about the somewhat peculiar tv broadcast standards
> used in South American countries such as Brazil and Argentina, but is
> often met with silence, or will only get some stray comments and
> guesswork from people living in other countries.
>
> This post falls in the latter category: I'm posting from Europe, living
> in a PAL B/G country (which is about to become a 576i/25 [625/50] DVB
> country next year) and I've never even set my foot on the continent of
> South America.
>
> > I've been wrestling with the need to buy a multisystem TV vs. just a
> > video converter. I've got a relatively new LCD TV that I'd rather not
> > toss and the multisystem TVs seem quite expensive...probably just a
> > result of limited resellers.
>
> As this is South America we're talking about, you need to be careful
> about tv standards. Even though PAL color encoding _usually_ implies a
> 625-line 50 Hz raster scanning standard, some South American countries
> use PAL color encoding in combination with an NTSC-style 525-line 59.94
> Hz raster. When weighing your options, the local raster scanning
> standard is what makes the main difference. Color encoding formats (PAL
> to NTSC, or vice versa) can be easily converted, but converting from one
> raster scanning standard to the other (625/50 to 525/59.94, or vice
> versa) is difficult, and will almost always significantly degrade the
> image quality (especially if you only have "domestic" standards
> conversion equipment at your disposal, and not something like the Snell
> & Wilcox Alchemist Ph.C.)
>
> As it turns out, the PAL-N broadcast standard, as used in Argentina, is
> a 625-line 50 Hz format. In other words, different from what is used in
> the US, and what your current tv set will accept. Hence, conversion with
> good quality is pretty much out of the question. You can get a watchable
> picture by using a domestic PAL-to-NTSC standards converter, but it will
> have motion artifacts (such as motion judder) and/or it will be blurrier
> than the original - especially for any part of the image where there is
> motion.
>
> > I plan on either getting cable or satellite TV, so I should have a
> > digital "box".  I also like to watch DVDs.  I'll probably mainly use
> > Netflix (I'll have access to an APO/FPO for delivery), but I'd like
> > the option of renting/buying local DVDs too, so I'll probably buy a
> > region free player.
> > As I understand it, if I've got a cable or satellite box, then I only
> > need to worry about converting the format (PAL to NTSC).  If I'm not
> > pulling TV off an antennae, then I don't see what a multisystem TV
> > would really get me. Am I missing anything?  Are there any other
> > reasons (in my situation) to consider a multisystem TV?
>
> As discussed above, any (domestic) conversion from a 625-line 50 Hz
> system to a 525-line 59.94 Hz system will introduce motion artifacts
> and/or blurriness, and therefore reduce the image quality. This
> reduction in image quality will happen regardless of whether the
> original 625/50 signal came from an antenna or from a set-top box.
>
> A multistandard tv set would benefit you by displaying both raster
> scanning formats natively, without this reduction in quality.
>
> * * *
>
> Note that in Europe and Australia - both 625/50 PAL(/SECAM)
> territories - multistandard tv sets have become the norm over the last
> 15 years. Even though the NTSC color encoding standard or the 525/59.94
> raster scanning format are not used for local tv broadcasts, video
> rentals, prerecorded DVD/VHS sales, or camcorders, people have lots of
> connections to NTSC countries, and will occasionally want to view
> NTSC-formatted VHS tapes or DVDs (for example, home videos from
> relatives, or obscure indie movies ordered from overseas.)
>
> It is possible that a similar development has also happened in Argentina
> and in other South American 625/50 countries. That wouldn't be too
> surprising, especially considering that the NTSC broadcast standard and
> 525/59.94 raster scanning is used in many surrounding South American
> countries, and the border areas of neighboring countries can probably
> receive each others' broadcasts. For instance, Argentina shares a long
> border with Peru, which is an NTSC-M country. Argentina is also likely
> to receive lots of satellite broadcasts in 525/59.94 format. There's
> probably just as much (if not more!) genuine need for NTSC or 525/59.94
> support in Argentina than in Europe and Australia.
>
> If this speculation turns out to be true, you might want to check out
> what kind of tv sets are available locally. Perhaps, in the best case,
> you will find out they're more or less all NTSC-compatible, and could
> find a nice NTSC-compatible set that you could bring back with you to
> the US. The selection, in that case, could also be better than in the
> US, where multistandard sets are not generally available in Walmart and
> the like.
>
> * * *
>
> Whichever way you decide about this, you will need a voltage converter,
> since Argentina, according to the Internet, is a 220 V 50 Hz country.
> (Unless you manage to find a set that is multistandard with voltages,
> too.)
I agree with most things Mr.Aho typed in his post and I have to add that the
best solution is to leave your TV and DVD back in the USA and buy some cheap
CRT in Argentina and some DVD player, too.(IMHO it would be a mess if you
carried your set with you with all your luggage just to find out it can't
operate on 220 V 50 Hz or something or maybe can't find a voltage converter
unless speaking fluently in Spanish with the shop owner ).



--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
dimtzort AT otenet DOT gr
Author
15 Nov 2006 10:32 AM
luigibys
Charles Goodman wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> I'm moving from the US to Argentina in December and will be in another
> country (don't know which yet) in 2 years as a result of my job.  I've been
> wrestling with the need to buy a multisystem TV vs. just a video converter.
> I've got a relatively new LCD TV that I'd rather not toss and the
> multisystem TVs seem quite expensive...probably just a result of limited
> resellers.
>
> I plan on either getting cable or satellite TV, so I should have a digital
> "box".  I also like to watch DVDs.  I'll probably mainly use Netflix (I'll
> have access to an APO/FPO for delivery), but I'd like the option of
> renting/buying local DVDs too, so I'll probably buy a region free player.
>
> As I understand it, if I've got a cable or satellite box, then I only need
> to worry about converting the format (PAL to NTSC).  If I'm not pulling TV
> off an antennae, then I don't see what a multisystem TV would really get me.
> Am I missing anything?  Are there any other reasons (in my situation) to
> consider a multisystem TV?
>
> Assuming I'm right, and a video converter is the way to go for me, can
> anyone recommend a top-notch converter?  Ports, video quality and number of
> formats supported will all be important to me.
>
> Thanks a lot for any help/advice.
>
> Best regards,
> Charles Goodman

Bookmark and Share