|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
anamorphic lens for camcorder
lens made for camcorders that would work? Can I attach a different type of anamorphic lens with an adapter for example? Thanks in advance for any information or advice on this. Geo. "KG" <kg***@hotmail.com> wrote in message There are lots of these available, but they're quite expensive:news:1159471890.918154.170290@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > My camcorder doesn't record true 16:9. Is there any type of anamorphic > lens made for camcorders that would work? Can I attach a different type > of anamorphic lens with an adapter for example? Thanks in advance for > any information or advice on this. > Geo. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home;jsessionid=FcmWM4sKjl!1051679615!1159472726851?ci=1&sb=ps&pn=1&sq=desc&InitialSearch=yes&O=RootPage.jsp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t&shs=anamorphic&image.x=5&image.y=7 Show quoteHide quote > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:55:46 -0700, "PTravel"
<ptra***@travelersvideo.com> wrote: > The irony is you can by a whole new 3-CCD camcorder with anamorphic>"KG" <kg***@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:1159471890.918154.170290@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... >> My camcorder doesn't record true 16:9. Is there any type of anamorphic >> lens made for camcorders that would work? Can I attach a different type >> of anamorphic lens with an adapter for example? Thanks in advance for >> any information or advice on this. >> Geo. > >There are lots of these available, but they're quite expensive: > >http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home;jsessionid=FcmWM4sKjl!1051679615!1159472726851?ci=1&sb=ps&pn=1&sq=desc&InitialSearch=yes&O=RootPage.jsp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t&shs=anamorphic&image.x=5&image.y=7 16:9 recording capability built right in for less than even the cheapest adapter on that page: http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-PV-GS500-Camcorder-Review.htm Scott en Aztlán wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:55:46 -0700, "PTravel" Well, yes, you can buy "a" camcorder, but it depends on what the OP> <ptra***@travelersvideo.com> wrote: > > > > >"KG" <kg***@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >news:1159471890.918154.170290@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > >> My camcorder doesn't record true 16:9. Is there any type of anamorphic > >> lens made for camcorders that would work? Can I attach a different type > >> of anamorphic lens with an adapter for example? Thanks in advance for > >> any information or advice on this. > >> Geo. > > > >There are lots of these available, but they're quite expensive: > > > >http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home;jsessionid=FcmWM4sKjl!1051679615!1159472726851?ci=1&sb=ps&pn=1&sq=desc&InitialSearch=yes&O=RootPage.jsp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t&shs=anamorphic&image.x=5&image.y=7 > > The irony is you can by a whole new 3-CCD camcorder with anamorphic > 16:9 recording capability built right in for less than even the > cheapest adapter on that page: > > http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-PV-GS500-Camcorder-Review.htm owns. The PV-GS500 is consumer grade with poor low-light performance, poor saturation and relatively poor sharpness. It will not compare to something like an XL2 or a VX2100 equipped with a good anamorphic lens. Everything depends on the OP's application. ptra***@travelersvideo.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > Scott en Aztlán wrote: As a follow-up, where do you see that the PV-GS500 has anamorphic> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:55:46 -0700, "PTravel" > > <ptra***@travelersvideo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >"KG" <kg***@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:1159471890.918154.170290@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > >> My camcorder doesn't record true 16:9. Is there any type of anamorphic > > >> lens made for camcorders that would work? Can I attach a different type > > >> of anamorphic lens with an adapter for example? Thanks in advance for > > >> any information or advice on this. > > >> Geo. > > > > > >There are lots of these available, but they're quite expensive: > > > > > >http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home;jsessionid=FcmWM4sKjl!1051679615!1159472726851?ci=1&sb=ps&pn=1&sq=desc&InitialSearch=yes&O=RootPage.jsp&A=search&Q=*&bhs=t&shs=anamorphic&image.x=5&image.y=7 > > > > The irony is you can by a whole new 3-CCD camcorder with anamorphic > > 16:9 recording capability built right in for less than even the > > cheapest adapter on that page: > > > > http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Panasonic-PV-GS500-Camcorder-Review.htm > > Well, yes, you can buy "a" camcorder, but it depends on what the OP > owns. The PV-GS500 is consumer grade with poor low-light performance, > poor saturation and relatively poor sharpness. It will not compare to > something like an XL2 or a VX2100 equipped with a good anamorphic lens. > Everything depends on the OP's application. capability? It is 16 x 9, yes, but not anamorphic. ptra***@travelersvideo.com writes:
>As a follow-up, where do you see that the PV-GS500 has anamorphic The mere act of recording a 16:9 image in an NTSC or PAL signal which is>capability? It is 16 x 9, yes, but not anamorphic. (according to their respective standards) 4:3 can be termed "anamorphic". For an example of this, most widescreen DVDs are recorded in what is termed "anamorphic widescreen". If you had a program that was really 16:9 to begin with, it would be recorded on DVD as 720x480 with no letterboxing, no black pixels. If you tell your DVD player that you have a 16:9 TV, it plays back the content unchanged, expecting your TV to display it at 16:9. If you tell you DVD player that you have a 4:3 TV, it internally resamples the video down to 360 lines in height, inserting 60 lines of black letterboxing top and bottom, so the image appears correct on your 4:3 TV. This is anamorphic because 16:9 content is squeezed into a 4:3 video format. (If the content is even wider than 16:9, it is first letterboxed to make it 16:9, then the above applies). Dave Dave Martindale wrote:
> ptra***@travelersvideo.com writes: Not in the same way as film can. Film frames always have a physical > >> As a follow-up, where do you see that the PV-GS500 has anamorphic >> capability? It is 16 x 9, yes, but not anamorphic. > The mere act of recording a 16:9 image in an NTSC or PAL signal > which is (according to their respective standards) 4:3 can be > termed "anamorphic". shape, so it's clear (just by looking at the frame with your own eyes) when something is "anamorphic" or not. Video signals, on the other hand, do not have an inherent, fixed physical shape. The "shape" of video signal is open to interpretation and redefinition. Unlike with film frames, calling 16:9 video "anamorphic" is based on mere convention, not on any physical properties of video signal that would make "4:3" the default interpretation. There are more accurate labels for the various picture formats than just "anamorphic", "widescreen", "16:9" or "4:3" (which often merely serve to cause confusion): <http://google.com/groups?threadm=334be06d.0301280141.2733939c@postin g.google.com> For example, it seems PTravel is thinking of the 16L12 format, whereas you're thinking of the 16F16 format. > If you tell your DVD player that you have a 16:9 TV, it plays back the True as a simplified explanation, but new 4:3 sets, at least here in PAL > content unchanged, expecting your TV to display it at 16:9. If you > tell > you DVD player that you have a 4:3 TV, it internally resamples the > video > down to 360 lines in height, inserting 60 lines of black letterboxing > top and bottom, so the image appears correct on your 4:3 TV. land, have supported 16F16 signals for quite a long time now. I.e. they can receive a 16F16 signal and squeeze it to 16L12 format using their own circuitry. (On 50 Hz sets, this is often done just by altering the vertical deflection, so that all scanlines of the original 16F16 picture will be drawn on the screen, but in a tighter pattern, leaving black areas above and below the picture.) This will retain more information from the original picture, and gives a better picture quality than using the 16L12 scaler/resampler in the DVD player, which will invariably throw away lots of information in the process. For these kind of modern 4:3 tv sets, the DVD player should be set up into "Widescreen (16:9)" mode, not in the "Standard (4:3)" or "Letterboxed" mode, since these 4:3 sets are every bit as aware of 16F16 signals as the actual 16:9 sets are. -- znark
NTSC/PAL problems for viewing cable on TV
Time to buy a 40" LCD? Website(s) for publishing my own video's My "German" VCR can't scan UK Television signals copying 16mm silent home movies to dvd Help finding camcorder Compressing 1gb video for web viewing Sci Fi Thriller - "Carrier" Pocket camcorder with cable? Picking the right graphics card for your NLE workstation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||