|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Hi-8 vs other 8s.
are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of equipment or another? I know very little about video recording, but I work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which tape they need. And I'm never sure how to answer. -- "For every problem there is a solution which is simple, clean and wrong." -- Henry Louis Mencken In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says... > The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to > I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats. But what > are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of > equipment or another? I know very little about video recording, but I > work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which > tape they need. And I'm never sure how to answer. store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats. Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up. In article <MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989***@news.chc.ihug.co.nz>,
Rob J <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>, Seriously, the Hi8/D8 recorder will recognize that it's a standard tape >glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says... >> >> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats. But what >> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of >> equipment or another? I know very little about video recording, but I >> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which >> tape they need. And I'm never sure how to answer. > >The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to >store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats. > >Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up. and run it faster? That's actually pretty darn cool. What fraction of recording time is lost? Is it safe to say that Hi8 and D8 will work in anything that takes standard 8mm tapes? -- "Work hard, be curious and persistent, and you will prevail." -- Howard Schilit, "Financial Shenanigans" 2nd ed. In article <dptug2$5k***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says... Show quoteHide quote > In article <MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989***@news.chc.ihug.co.nz>, 1/3 in PAL> Rob J <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote: > >In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>, > >glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says... > >> > >> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats. But what > >> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of > >> equipment or another? I know very little about video recording, but I > >> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which > >> tape they need. And I'm never sure how to answer. > > > >The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to > >store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats. > > > >Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up. > > > Seriously, the Hi8/D8 recorder will recognize that it's a standard tape > and run it faster? That's actually pretty darn cool. What fraction of > recording time is lost? > Is it safe to say that Hi8 and D8 will work in anything that takes Yes> standard 8mm tapes? In article <MPG.1e2dd82840765ce2989***@news.chc.ihug.co.nz>,
Rob J <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >In article <dptug2$5k***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>, Thanks.>glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says... >> In article <MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989***@news.chc.ihug.co.nz>, >> Rob J <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote: >> >In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>, >> >glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says... >> >> >> >> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats. But what >> >> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of >> >> equipment or another? I know very little about video recording, but I >> >> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which >> >> tape they need. And I'm never sure how to answer. >> > >> >The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to >> >store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats. >> > >> >Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up. >> >> >> Seriously, the Hi8/D8 recorder will recognize that it's a standard tape >> and run it faster? That's actually pretty darn cool. What fraction of >> recording time is lost? > >1/3 in PAL > >> Is it safe to say that Hi8 and D8 will work in anything that takes >> standard 8mm tapes? > >Yes -- "Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin
Show quote
Hide quote
"Rob J" <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote in message Standard 8 and Hi 8 run at exactly the same speed. The difference, as I news:MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989b39@news.chc.ihug.co.nz... > In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>, > glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says... >> >> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats. But what >> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of >> equipment or another? I know very little about video recording, but I >> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which >> tape they need. And I'm never sure how to answer. > > The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to > store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats. > > Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up. recall, is that the color signal is split off in Hi8, allowing higher bandwidth, providing better resolution. Hi 8 tape has higher coercivity to handle the additional bandwidth. The camera tells the difference based on holes in the bottom of the case. Back when I was shooting Hi8, in a pinch, I'd drill the extra hole in a standard 8 cassette -- it always worked fine. "PTRAVEL" <ptravel88-use***@yahoo.com> writes: The colour signal is *always* split off in any "color under" system,>Standard 8 and Hi 8 run at exactly the same speed. The difference, as I >recall, is that the color signal is split off in Hi8, allowing higher >bandwidth, providing better resolution. which includes BetaMax, VHS, the Super versions of those, and 8/Hi8. The colour subcarrier is recorded directly on tape, while the luminance signal is used to FM modulate a high-frequency carrier whose frequency is above the colour band. What Hi8 (and SVHS etc) do is raise the frequency of the luminance carrier. This provides more separation between chroma and luma carriers, which in turn allows higher-frequency luminance to be recorded and recovered, which gives finer luminance detail (with no improvement in colour). Thus, the total recorded signal has a wider bandwidth. This is in contrast to laserdisc and old professional analog video recorders, which FM modulate the carrier with the *entire* composite video signal including colour information. These give better quality, but require a timebase corrector for playback. Then there's Betacam, which separates the signal into 3 components, time-compresses all of them, and then records them sequentially (Y, Cb, Cr). Both of these avoid color-under recording but require more total recording bandwidth from the tape than the consumer tape formats. >Hi 8 tape has higher coercivity to Dave>handle the additional bandwidth. The camera tells the difference based on >holes in the bottom of the case. Back when I was shooting Hi8, in a pinch, >I'd drill the extra hole in a standard 8 cassette -- it always worked fine.
Show quote
Hide quote
"Dave Martindale" <da***@cs.ubc.ca> wrote in message Thank you for the lucid explanation.news:dpu9vs$2hu$1@swain.cs.ubc.ca... > "PTRAVEL" <ptravel88-use***@yahoo.com> writes: > > >Standard 8 and Hi 8 run at exactly the same speed. The difference, as I > >recall, is that the color signal is split off in Hi8, allowing higher > >bandwidth, providing better resolution. > > The colour signal is *always* split off in any "color under" system, > which includes BetaMax, VHS, the Super versions of those, and 8/Hi8. > The colour subcarrier is recorded directly on tape, while the luminance > signal is used to FM modulate a high-frequency carrier whose frequency > is above the colour band. > > What Hi8 (and SVHS etc) do is raise the frequency of the luminance > carrier. This provides more separation between chroma and luma > carriers, which in turn allows higher-frequency luminance to be recorded > and recovered, which gives finer luminance detail (with no improvement > in colour). Thus, the total recorded signal has a wider bandwidth. Show quoteHide quote > > This is in contrast to laserdisc and old professional analog video > recorders, which FM modulate the carrier with the *entire* composite > video signal including colour information. These give better quality, > but require a timebase corrector for playback. Then there's Betacam, > which separates the signal into 3 components, time-compresses all of > them, and then records them sequentially (Y, Cb, Cr). Both of these > avoid color-under recording but require more total recording bandwidth > from the tape than the consumer tape formats. > > >Hi 8 tape has higher coercivity to > >handle the additional bandwidth. The camera tells the difference based on > >holes in the bottom of the case. Back when I was shooting Hi8, in a pinch, > >I'd drill the extra hole in a standard 8 cassette -- it always worked fine. > > Dave > In article <42fengF1iuku***@individual.net>, ptravel88-use***@yahoo.com
says... Show quoteHide quote > When a standard 8 tape is put in a H8/D8 camera for recording the S8 > "Rob J" <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote in message > news:MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989b39@news.chc.ihug.co.nz... > > In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>, > > glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says... > >> > >> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats. But what > >> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of > >> equipment or another? I know very little about video recording, but I > >> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which > >> tape they need. And I'm never sure how to answer. > > > > The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to > > store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats. > > > > Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up. > > Standard 8 and Hi 8 run at exactly the same speed. The difference, as I > recall, is that the color signal is split off in Hi8, allowing higher > bandwidth, providing better resolution. Hi 8 tape has higher coercivity to > handle the additional bandwidth. The camera tells the difference based on > holes in the bottom of the case. Back when I was shooting Hi8, in a pinch, > I'd drill the extra hole in a standard 8 cassette -- it always worked fine. tape is sped up 50%. Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats. But what Hi 8 tape and D8 tape are actually the same formulation. D8 runs at> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of > equipment or another? I know very little about video recording, but I > work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which > tape they need. And I'm never sure how to answer. > > -- > "For every problem there is a solution which is simple, clean and wrong." > -- Henry Louis Mencken twice the speed. Regular 8mm tape used in a Hi8 camcorder will record in regular 8 unless you drill the detection hole. Any tape used in a regular 8 camcorder will record regular 8. cb
Which digital camera records 30fps video?
FA: Pro Audio and Video, Warehouse Clearance, Happy Holidays which sfw removes vhs macromedia protection? Adobe Premier Elements and CyberLink PowerDVD, picture aspect ratio problem bestpricecameras.com are N.Y. style con artists Firewire dropping on Sony HC19E time-lapse + waterproof housing + digital media Sony HC40 audio incompatibility? camcorders with remote lens Mitsubishi HS-U760 high end VCR problems |
|||||||||||||||||||||||