Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Hi-8 vs other 8s.

Author
8 Jan 2006 1:20 AM
Gregory L. Hansen
I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats.  But what
are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of
equipment or another?  I know very little about video recording, but I
work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which
tape they need.  And I'm never sure how to answer.

--
"For every problem there is a solution which is simple, clean and wrong."
-- Henry Louis Mencken

Author
9 Jan 2006 5:41 AM
Rob J
In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says...
>
> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats.  But what
> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of
> equipment or another?  I know very little about video recording, but I
> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which
> tape they need.  And I'm never sure how to answer.

The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to
store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats.

Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up.
Author
9 Jan 2006 3:12 PM
Gregory L. Hansen
In article <MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989***@news.chc.ihug.co.nz>,
Rob J  <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
>In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
>glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says...
>>
>> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats.  But what
>> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of
>> equipment or another?  I know very little about video recording, but I
>> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which
>> tape they need.  And I'm never sure how to answer.
>
>The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to
>store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats.
>
>Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up.


Seriously, the Hi8/D8 recorder will recognize that it's a standard tape
and run it faster?  That's actually pretty darn cool.  What fraction of
recording time is lost?

Is it safe to say that Hi8 and D8 will work in anything that takes
standard 8mm tapes?

--
"Work hard, be curious and persistent, and you will prevail." -- Howard
Schilit, "Financial Shenanigans" 2nd ed.
Author
10 Jan 2006 1:42 AM
Rob J
In article <dptug2$5k***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says...
Show quoteHide quote
> In article <MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989***@news.chc.ihug.co.nz>,
> Rob J  <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote:
> >In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
> >glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says...
> >>
> >> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats.  But what
> >> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of
> >> equipment or another?  I know very little about video recording, but I
> >> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which
> >> tape they need.  And I'm never sure how to answer.
> >
> >The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to
> >store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats.
> >
> >Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up.
>
>
> Seriously, the Hi8/D8 recorder will recognize that it's a standard tape
> and run it faster?  That's actually pretty darn cool.  What fraction of
> recording time is lost?

1/3 in PAL

> Is it safe to say that Hi8 and D8 will work in anything that takes
> standard 8mm tapes?

Yes
Author
10 Jan 2006 4:24 AM
Gregory L. Hansen
In article <MPG.1e2dd82840765ce2989***@news.chc.ihug.co.nz>,
Rob J  <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
>In article <dptug2$5k***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
>glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says...
>> In article <MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989***@news.chc.ihug.co.nz>,
>> Rob J  <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote:
>> >In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
>> >glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says...
>> >>
>> >> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats.  But what
>> >> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of
>> >> equipment or another?  I know very little about video recording, but I
>> >> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which
>> >> tape they need.  And I'm never sure how to answer.
>> >
>> >The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to
>> >store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats.
>> >
>> >Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up.
>>
>>
>> Seriously, the Hi8/D8 recorder will recognize that it's a standard tape
>> and run it faster?  That's actually pretty darn cool.  What fraction of
>> recording time is lost?
>
>1/3 in PAL
>
>> Is it safe to say that Hi8 and D8 will work in anything that takes
>> standard 8mm tapes?
>
>Yes


Thanks.

--
"Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Author
9 Jan 2006 3:44 PM
PTRAVEL
Show quote Hide quote
"Rob J" <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989b39@news.chc.ihug.co.nz...
> In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
> glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says...
>>
>> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats.  But what
>> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of
>> equipment or another?  I know very little about video recording, but I
>> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which
>> tape they need.  And I'm never sure how to answer.
>
> The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to
> store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats.
>
> Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up.

Standard 8 and Hi 8 run at exactly the same speed.  The difference, as I
recall, is that the color signal is split off in Hi8, allowing higher
bandwidth, providing better resolution.  Hi 8 tape has higher coercivity to
handle the additional bandwidth.  The camera tells the difference based on
holes in the bottom of the case.  Back when I was shooting Hi8, in a pinch,
I'd drill the extra hole in a standard 8 cassette -- it always worked fine.
Author
9 Jan 2006 6:28 PM
Dave Martindale
"PTRAVEL" <ptravel88-use***@yahoo.com> writes:

>Standard 8 and Hi 8 run at exactly the same speed.  The difference, as I
>recall, is that the color signal is split off in Hi8, allowing higher
>bandwidth, providing better resolution.

The colour signal is *always* split off in any "color under" system,
which includes BetaMax, VHS, the Super versions of those, and 8/Hi8.
The colour subcarrier is recorded directly on tape, while the luminance
signal is used to FM modulate a high-frequency carrier whose frequency
is above the colour band.

What Hi8 (and SVHS etc) do is raise the frequency of the luminance
carrier.  This provides more separation between chroma and luma
carriers, which in turn allows higher-frequency luminance to be recorded
and recovered, which gives finer luminance detail (with no improvement
in colour).  Thus, the total recorded signal has a wider bandwidth.

This is in contrast to laserdisc and old professional analog video
recorders, which FM modulate the carrier with the *entire* composite
video signal including colour information.  These give better quality,
but require a timebase corrector for playback.  Then there's Betacam,
which separates the signal into 3 components, time-compresses all of
them, and then records them sequentially (Y, Cb, Cr).  Both of these
avoid color-under recording but require more total recording bandwidth
from the tape than the consumer tape formats.

>Hi 8 tape has higher coercivity to
>handle the additional bandwidth.  The camera tells the difference based on
>holes in the bottom of the case.  Back when I was shooting Hi8, in a pinch,
>I'd drill the extra hole in a standard 8 cassette -- it always worked fine.

    Dave
Author
11 Jan 2006 3:39 PM
PTravel
Show quote Hide quote
"Dave Martindale" <da***@cs.ubc.ca> wrote in message
news:dpu9vs$2hu$1@swain.cs.ubc.ca...
> "PTRAVEL" <ptravel88-use***@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> >Standard 8 and Hi 8 run at exactly the same speed.  The difference, as I
> >recall, is that the color signal is split off in Hi8, allowing higher
> >bandwidth, providing better resolution.
>
> The colour signal is *always* split off in any "color under" system,
> which includes BetaMax, VHS, the Super versions of those, and 8/Hi8.
> The colour subcarrier is recorded directly on tape, while the luminance
> signal is used to FM modulate a high-frequency carrier whose frequency
> is above the colour band.
>
> What Hi8 (and SVHS etc) do is raise the frequency of the luminance
> carrier.  This provides more separation between chroma and luma
> carriers, which in turn allows higher-frequency luminance to be recorded
> and recovered, which gives finer luminance detail (with no improvement
> in colour).  Thus, the total recorded signal has a wider bandwidth.

Thank you for the lucid explanation.


Show quoteHide quote
>
> This is in contrast to laserdisc and old professional analog video
> recorders, which FM modulate the carrier with the *entire* composite
> video signal including colour information.  These give better quality,
> but require a timebase corrector for playback.  Then there's Betacam,
> which separates the signal into 3 components, time-compresses all of
> them, and then records them sequentially (Y, Cb, Cr).  Both of these
> avoid color-under recording but require more total recording bandwidth
> from the tape than the consumer tape formats.
>
> >Hi 8 tape has higher coercivity to
> >handle the additional bandwidth.  The camera tells the difference based
on
> >holes in the bottom of the case.  Back when I was shooting Hi8, in a
pinch,
> >I'd drill the extra hole in a standard 8 cassette -- it always worked
fine.
>
> Dave
>
Author
10 Jan 2006 1:43 AM
Rob J
In article <42fengF1iuku***@individual.net>, ptravel88-use***@yahoo.com
says...
Show quoteHide quote
>
> "Rob J" <rob.j@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1e2cbeac6be7d318989b39@news.chc.ihug.co.nz...
> > In article <dpppca$kh***@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
> > glhan***@steel.ucs.indiana.edu says...
> >>
> >> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats.  But what
> >> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of
> >> equipment or another?  I know very little about video recording, but I
> >> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which
> >> tape they need.  And I'm never sure how to answer.
> >
> > The difference is in tape formulation and whether it can be used to
> > store the higher density data in the Hi8 / Digital8 formats.
> >
> > Standard tapes if used in a Hi8/D8 camera will be speeded up.
>
> Standard 8 and Hi 8 run at exactly the same speed.  The difference, as I
> recall, is that the color signal is split off in Hi8, allowing higher
> bandwidth, providing better resolution.  Hi 8 tape has higher coercivity to
> handle the additional bandwidth.  The camera tells the difference based on
> holes in the bottom of the case.  Back when I was shooting Hi8, in a pinch,
> I'd drill the extra hole in a standard 8 cassette -- it always worked fine.

When a standard 8 tape is put in a H8/D8 camera for recording the S8
tape is sped up 50%.
Author
10 Jan 2006 2:46 AM
Mr. Tapeguy
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
> I know different 8mm versions have different recording formats.  But what
> are the differences in blank tapes bought to be used in one peice of
> equipment or another?  I know very little about video recording, but I
> work as a retail schlub, and once in a while a customer will ask me which
> tape they need.  And I'm never sure how to answer.
>
> --
> "For every problem there is a solution which is simple, clean and wrong."
>  -- Henry Louis Mencken

Hi 8 tape and D8 tape are actually the same formulation.  D8 runs at
twice the speed.  Regular 8mm tape used in a Hi8 camcorder will record
in regular 8 unless you drill the detection hole.  Any tape used in a
regular 8 camcorder will record regular 8.

cb