|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
LCD Pixels
have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? What about 3 years? Alex Depends on how many parties you have.
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:06:00 -0600, "amcwill417" <amcwill***@email.msn.com> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >What is the probability that a 40 inch LCD TV (perhaps a new Sony XBR) will >have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? >What about 3 years? > >Alex > Not to mention kids.
Show quoteHide quote "Donald Link" <li***@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:eegnn1hc103ak87849an56hms2p5uh4iu8@4ax.com... > Depends on how many parties you have. > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:06:00 -0600, "amcwill417" > <amcwill***@email.msn.com> wrote: > > >What is the probability that a 40 inch LCD TV (perhaps a new Sony XBR) will > >have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? > >What about 3 years? > > > >Alex > > My experience with LCD TVs has been that the dead/stuck pixels are
dead/stuck right from the start, or perhaps shortly there after. So if you don't have any at 2 years, you aren't likely to have any at 3. Different manufacturers have different policies towards dead/stuck pixels. You should check out their policies before any purchase and make sure their policy fits your sensitvities. How Show quoteHide quote "amcwill417" <amcwill***@email.msn.com> wrote in message news:%gFef.2$eP.180@eagle.america.net... > What is the probability that a 40 inch LCD TV (perhaps a new Sony XBR) > will > have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? > What about 3 years? > > Alex > > "Howard Ring" <newsring@nospam.wideopenwest.com> wrote in message Thanks for your reply.news:78KdnWefyLr_YObenZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@wideopenwest.com... > My experience with LCD TVs has been that the dead/stuck pixels are > dead/stuck right from the start, or perhaps shortly there after. So if you > don't have any at 2 years, you aren't likely to have any at 3. Different > manufacturers have different policies towards dead/stuck pixels. You should > check out their policies before any purchase and make sure their policy fits > your sensitvities. > > How > Alex Show quoteHide quote > > "amcwill417" <amcwill***@email.msn.com> wrote in message > news:%gFef.2$eP.180@eagle.america.net... > > What is the probability that a 40 inch LCD TV (perhaps a new Sony XBR) > > will > > have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? > > What about 3 years? > > > > Alex > > > > > > A dead/stuck pixel is one that no longer appears the proper color. A dead
pixel would just go black, but sometimes pixels just lose a color, or two. Maybe the red no longer works, but the blue and green do. I have this situation on my DILA. Generally if just a pixel goes, it isn't very noticable, it is when you get clusters of pixels that you take notice. My DILA (80" front projection) has various pixels out (from the get go). It is not very noticable, the only time I see them is when I go looking for them. I also have 17" and 24" lcd computer monitors. The 17" is about 3 years old, the 24" about 6 months. I have used both extensively. Neither have any dead or stuck pixels that I have noticed. For best results, you want to use these at their otpimum (native) settings. The 24" is 1920x1200 native. Sometimes it auto-synchs to 1600x1200, Windows meanwhile thinks everything is 1920x1200 still. Needless to say, things appear fuzzy then, especially text. When this happens, I just set the display size to something else and then back to 1920x1200, clears up the problem every time. From your description, I am guessing you have something not quite configured right with your 20" monitor. You are not matching its native resolution, or you have something with your anti-aliasing and/or your graphics card not set the way it should be. How <fivei***@webtv.net> wrote in message news:1818-438012FD-5@storefull-3312.bay.webtv.net... what is a dead-stuck pixel? I have a 20" l c d philip tv / monitor, andsome sites I load, not all, the characters look "crippled" - and there is an auxiliary color "shading" the text, and on some the bg appears mottled with various colors. and the funny thing is, this situation while constant for a long time, tonight it appeared in a site I had just loaded and a before the site fully loaded - blip, it disappeared right before my eyes. Crazy. m h o v fe On 11/21/2005, fivei***@webtv.net managed to type:
Show quoteHide quote > Thanks Howard for the comments. You probably, as Howard says, have the wrong configuration set. My > > Here is a site on the tv / monitor I'm presently using, and having > minimal problems as outlined earlier. > > http://www.samsclub.com/eclub/main_shopping.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&n=0&mt=a&coe=0&oidPath=0:-23542:-23589:-24298:-36941:955263 > > With Webtv/Msntv as the isp - one has very little chance of making some > adjustments. > > The situation is not unbearable, just puzzling, and particularly so when > I momentarily witnessed it making a _one-time_ self-correction for the > site content to be viewed, to reappear in subsequent sites later. > ==== > The above tv/monitor is a replacement for one that crashed (none of the > above problems with it). While getting the replacement I used a 13" CRT > Magnavox TV - and the same situation mentioned above - existed with it. > > Now it appears, to me anyway, that there is something inherit in the > Philips / Magnavox units that is responsible for the glitz, or the > intelligence being received is - amiss. > > m h o > v ƒe guess: the resolution is wrong. Try this: right click on a blank spot of the desktop (minimize or shut down apps so you can find a blank spot). On the menu which appears, choose Properties, click the Settings tab, and move the slider in the "Screen resolution" panel to 800x600 (I got this number from the Philips website after browsing to the model number you gave us). Click OK, and if it looks good, accept it before it times out. If I guessed right, your troubles are over... HTH, Gino -- Gene E. Bloch (Gino) letters617blochg3251 (replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom") Yes, they should be viewed from as head on as possible. Usually, the more
off center the viewing angle, the dimmer the picture. Maybe something in the WebTV anti-aliasing technology causes a differet result. Interesting also that the writeup you gave us: http://www.samsclub.com/eclub/main_shopping.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&n=0&mt=a&coe=0&oidPath=0:-23542:-23589:-24298:-36941:955263 and the Phillips website: http://www.consumer.philips.com/consumer/catalog/product.jsp?language=en&country=US&catalogType=CONSUMER&productId=20PF5120_28_US_CONSUMER don't agree on the resolution. Perhaps that was a closeout deal, and Phillips has since enhanced that model. If they did that, they should enhance the model number also. Howard <fivei***@webtv.net> wrote in message news:23572-438295E8-724@storefull-3314.bay.webtv.net... Thanks for all the comments on the problem.I've come to the conclusion that LCD TV / Monitors should be viewed - head-on (at eye level) - for optimum video results. When the TV screen in question was lowered to eye level - the problems I was complaining about - disappeared, and the overall picture improved. m h o v fe Nobody really knows, because LCD tvs are a recent discovery.While CRT TVs
can last one decade with no damage and two decades with minimal repairs, and still play on,nobody knows what the behavior of a LCD tv will be in 5 or 10 years.I suppose the manufacturers have put stress tests on them, but as tvs are no medicines they won't have let 'em run for 10 years.Now, in the store I work, the cheapest Philips CRT 29"TV goes for just 330 euros and there's no reason not getting it, with the excellent picture it offers. -- Show quoteHide quoteTzortzakakis Dimitrios major in electrical engineering, freelance electrician FH von Iraklion-Kreta, freiberuflicher Elektriker dimtzort AT otenet DOT gr Ï "amcwill417" <amcwill***@email.msn.com> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá news:%gFef.2$eP.180@eagle.america.net... > What is the probability that a 40 inch LCD TV (perhaps a new Sony XBR) will > have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? > What about 3 years? > > Alex > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:06:00 -0600, "amcwill417"
<amcwill***@email.msn.com> wrote: >What is the probability that a 40 inch LCD TV (perhaps a new Sony XBR) will We'll tell you when the first domestic 40" LCD screens reach 3 years>have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? >What about 3 years? old :-) In article <%gFef.2$eP.***@eagle.america.net>, "amcwill417" <amcwill***@email.msn.com> wrote: Knowing Sony's workmanship these days, probably good bet that you'll have >What is the probability that a 40 inch LCD TV (perhaps a new Sony XBR) will >have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? >What about 3 years? dead pixels PDQ. In any event, why not join the "Boycott Sony" band which is gaining strength. Dariusz "Dariusz" <m*@localhost.com> wrote in message <amcwill***@email.msn.com> wrote:news:437e263a$0$63097$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net... > In article <%gFef.2$eP.***@eagle.america.net>, "amcwill417" > >What is the probability that a 40 inch LCD TV (perhaps a new Sony XBR) A little late now. All my stuff is Sony except for two small Bose speakers.will > >have some defective pixels within 2 years of purchase new? > >What about 3 years? > > Knowing Sony's workmanship these days, probably good bet that you'll have > dead pixels PDQ. In any event, why not join the "Boycott Sony" band which > is gaining strength. > > Dariusz Alex
DVD-R and DVD+R - Can someone explain?
digital-8 recommendations for replacement for Sony DCR-TRV 230 Where to find used camcorders? HD newbie question.. yes, I'm dumb... Using S-VHS cable for RGB Hooking Up Closed-Captioning on DVDs... Sony MicroMV problem - missing video clip Looking to buy in nyc area! budget camcorder with manual focus |
|||||||||||||||||||||||