|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
best camcorder for under $500
could anyone recommend a good camcorder? i'm looking for one in the price range of $500 or less thanks xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> hi, www.camcorderinfo.com has many good camcorder reviews. Good place to start.> > could anyone recommend a good camcorder? i'm looking for one in the > price range of $500 or less > > thanks > A Cheap one!
Sharp VL-Z3U and similar models for <$180 on ebay.com Solid, basic camcorder. Just don't expect a lot of video resolution here. A cheap 3CCD! Fry's electronics in CA, CircuitCity and GoodGuys open-box and end of season models, etc. Can easily get a Panasonic 3CCD for <$500. Much better video resolution vs. the common lot of Sony, Panasonic, etc. DV camcorders with 1CCD for the consumer sold in stores today. A cheap DVD model! See www.fatwallet.com/c/18/ and search for 'hitachi dvd'. That one website authorized by Hitachi to sell their refurbished DVD camcorders at $300-$350 is a steal vs. the $600+ they normally go for. A flash-card based model! Rather than going tape, try tapeless! The latest digital cameras (Casio 7MP model, etc.; Sanyo Xacti C4/C5 models; Sony DSC-M1 model; That one Samsung sold at BestBuy) etc. all record in MPEG-4 640x480 30fps format to flash cards. Far lighter than any camcorder, shock proof (no moving parts), and offers quicker transfer to the PC for editing than tape - these digital camcorders also offer built-in 4+MP digital camera capability, and much more. Really the wave of the future, and you really get much nicer quality off these than most cheap 1CCD camcorders sold today. That CVS pharmacy store model for $25 or so. Search the web for hacks on modifying this one-time-use camcorder for multiple uses, your own downloads to your PC, mods to let it record in 640x480 resolution, etc. Really nice if you're thinking of attaching the camcorder to a toy plane or remote controlled toy and don't want to crash a $$$$$ camcorder. "David Chien" <chie***@uci.edu> wrote in message Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better videonews:dfscvl$dst$1@news.service.uci.edu... > A Cheap one! > Sharp VL-Z3U and similar models for <$180 on ebay.com > Solid, basic camcorder. Just don't expect a lot of video resolution > here. > > A cheap 3CCD! > Fry's electronics in CA, CircuitCity and GoodGuys open-box and end > of season models, etc. > Can easily get a Panasonic 3CCD for <$500. Much better video > resolution vs. the common lot of Sony, Panasonic, etc. DV camcorders > with 1CCD for the consumer sold in stores today. than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models. Small sensors, cheap glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how many sensors there are. > DVD camcorders are consumer toys designed for people who have no interest in> A cheap DVD model! > See www.fatwallet.com/c/18/ and search for 'hitachi dvd'. That one > website authorized by Hitachi to sell their refurbished DVD camcorders > at $300-$350 is a steal vs. the $600+ they normally go for. producing quality video. They are the worst of the lot. > I assume when the OP used the word "best" it was because he was interested> A flash-card based model! > Rather than going tape, try tapeless! The latest digital cameras > (Casio 7MP model, etc.; Sanyo Xacti C4/C5 models; Sony DSC-M1 model; > That one Samsung sold at BestBuy) etc. all record in MPEG-4 640x480 > 30fps format to flash cards. in something that would produce the best video. These silly toys barely produce video at all. > Far lighter than any camcorder, shock proof (no moving parts), and What they don't offer is decent video quality.> offers quicker transfer to the PC for editing than tape - these digital > camcorders also offer built-in 4+MP digital camera capability, and much > more. > Really the wave of the future, Only the far, far future. Tape will continue to dominate for at least thenext decade. > and you really get much nicer quality Completely untrue.> off these than most cheap 1CCD camcorders sold today. > You've got to be kidding. The OP asked about camcorders, not toys.> That CVS pharmacy store model for $25 or so. Show quoteHide quote > Search the web for hacks on modifying this one-time-use camcorder > for multiple uses, your own downloads to your PC, mods to let it record > in 640x480 resolution, etc. > Really nice if you're thinking of attaching the camcorder to a toy > plane or remote controlled toy and don't want to crash a $$$$$ camcorder. PTravel wrote:
> Granted, but the Pannasonic GS200 produces a very nice video. It is, as > > Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better video > than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models. Small sensors, cheap > glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how many > sensors there are. most every review will tell you, not very good in low light, but in daylight or a well light indoor setting, it will produce an excellent video with clear and vibrant colors. For under $800, its probably cheaper than the to of the line one chippers. RS
Show quote
Hide quote
"RS" <m***@mail.com> wrote in message news:4321fb66$1_3@newspeer2.tds.net... Most any miniDV camcorder will produce good video in bright daylight. It is> PTravel wrote: > > > > > > > Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better video > > than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models. Small sensors, cheap > > glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how many > > sensors there are. > > Granted, but the Pannasonic GS200 produces a very nice video. It is, as > most every review will tell you, not very good in low light, but in > daylight or a well light indoor setting, it will produce an excellent > video with clear and vibrant colors. For under $800, its probably > cheaper than the to of the line one chippers. cheaper than the top-of-the-line single chippers, but I haven't seen anything which suggests it is comparable. Show quoteHide quote > > RS PTravel wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > "RS" <m***@mail.com> wrote in message news:4321fb66$1_3@newspeer2.tds.net... Again, you are technically right, which of course is the best kind of > >>PTravel wrote: >> >> >>> >>>Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better video >>>than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models. Small sensors, cheap >>>glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how > > many > >>>sensors there are. >> >>Granted, but the Pannasonic GS200 produces a very nice video. It is, as >>most every review will tell you, not very good in low light, but in >>daylight or a well light indoor setting, it will produce an excellent >>video with clear and vibrant colors. For under $800, its probably >>cheaper than the to of the line one chippers. > > > Most any miniDV camcorder will produce good video in bright daylight. It is > cheaper than the top-of-the-line single chippers, but I haven't seen > anything which suggests it is comparable. > > > right to be. So, how much are you spending on this top of the line one chipper? It's all find and good to compare, but when it comes to pulling out the wallet, things suddenly become relative. Did a little two camera shoot a week ago. One camera was a GL1 from the cable access studio and the other my GS200. After looking at the footable of the two side by side, my crew and I agreed that the GS200 was slightly more vibrant, but also a tiny bit hotter. We felt however that we could have eliminated that had we had the time to do manual exposure control. The GL-1, while softer on the colors, had a slight tendency to overexpose one on reflections, such as light off a bald persons head, but again, we can compensate for this in post, or could have eliminated it had we had time to do detailed setting of the studio lights. So, yeah, I think it's actually comparable. And as its at least a thousand less than anything considered 'top', and since I'm not a making any money doing video, its what you call the best bang for the buck.
Show quote
Hide quote
"RS" <m***@mail.com> wrote in message news:4325888c_1@newspeer2.tds.net... I don't have one, but I understand they are in the $1200-1500 range.> PTravel wrote: > > "RS" <m***@mail.com> wrote in message news:4321fb66$1_3@newspeer2.tds.net... > > > >>PTravel wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>>Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better video > >>>than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models. Small sensors, cheap > >>>glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how > > > > many > > > >>>sensors there are. > >> > >>Granted, but the Pannasonic GS200 produces a very nice video. It is, as > >>most every review will tell you, not very good in low light, but in > >>daylight or a well light indoor setting, it will produce an excellent > >>video with clear and vibrant colors. For under $800, its probably > >>cheaper than the to of the line one chippers. > > > > > > Most any miniDV camcorder will produce good video in bright daylight. It is > > cheaper than the top-of-the-line single chippers, but I haven't seen > > anything which suggests it is comparable. > > > > > > > > Again, you are technically right, which of course is the best kind of > right to be. > > So, how much are you spending on this top of the line one chipper? It's > all find and good to compare, but when it comes to pulling out the > wallet, things suddenly become relative. > The GL1 is not a good camcorder. The GL2, on the other hand, will do much> Did a little two camera shoot a week ago. One camera was a GL1 from the > cable access studio and the other my GS200. After looking at the > footable of the two side by side, my crew and I agreed that the GS200 > was slightly more vibrant, but also a tiny bit hotter. better than a GS200. A VX2100/PD170 will do far better than all of them. Show quoteHide quote > We felt however > that we could have eliminated that had we had the time to do manual > exposure control. The GL-1, while softer on the colors, had a slight > tendency to overexpose one on reflections, such as light off a bald > persons head, but again, we can compensate for this in post, or could > have eliminated it had we had time to do detailed setting of the studio > lights. > > So, yeah, I think it's actually comparable > And as its at least a > thousand less than anything considered 'top', and since I'm not a making > any money doing video, its what you call the best bang for the buck. > > thanks for the reply
i'm looking for a decent camcorder for recreational purposes, i.e. travel, outdoor activities, etc... i think i need it to be compact, long battery running time, reliable, and good built quality, and my budget is around $500. what's the best camcorder to fit into above criterion is what i want On 9 Sep 2005 23:38:21 -0700, xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
>thanks for the reply If someone already has suggested this, my apologies. Anyway, check> >i'm looking for a decent camcorder for recreational purposes, i.e. >travel, outdoor activities, etc... > >i think i need it to be compact, long battery running time, reliable, >and good built quality, and my budget is around $500. what's the best >camcorder to fit into above criterion is what i want out the new Sanyo VPC-C5. Here's a review at Steve's Digicams: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/c5.html In addition to MPEG4 videos, it also take 5 megapixel stills. If you shop around you should be able to find it in your price range. Good luck! Hal Lowe http://www.halogos.com (logo t-shirts, mugs, etc.) (make sure to check out the digiphoto t-shirts) http://www.halowe-graphics.com/photo.html (digiPhoto) http://www.halowe-graphics.com/music.html (Music Central) http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=7391019 (web hosting) http://www.halowe-graphics.com/tinc?key=0TmhZVQ5&formname=web_email
Show quote
Hide quote
"Hal Lowe" <hall***@hotmail.com> wrote in message The camera compresses to mpeg4 on the fly, resulting in poorer quality videonews:uei5i1dmq6oem3ev61o42rf54s4mudo9t8@4ax.com... > On 9 Sep 2005 23:38:21 -0700, xion***@my-deja.com wrote: > > >thanks for the reply > > > >i'm looking for a decent camcorder for recreational purposes, i.e. > >travel, outdoor activities, etc... > > > >i think i need it to be compact, long battery running time, reliable, > >and good built quality, and my budget is around $500. what's the best > >camcorder to fit into above criterion is what i want > > If someone already has suggested this, my apologies. Anyway, check > out the new Sanyo VPC-C5. Here's a review at Steve's Digicams: > > http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/c5.html than you'd get from a miniDV machine. In addition, the resulting video can't be edited, with re-transcoding to some other format -- certainly none of the "mainstream" editors can handle mpeg4. Add to that the fact that, judging from the lens size, the sensors must be microscopic and of ridiculously high-density, and it's going to have horrendous low-light performance. Show quoteHide quote > > In addition to MPEG4 videos, it also take 5 megapixel stills. If you > shop around you should be able to find it in your price range. > > Good luck! > > Hal Lowe > > http://www.halogos.com (logo t-shirts, mugs, etc.) > (make sure to check out the digiphoto t-shirts) > http://www.halowe-graphics.com/photo.html (digiPhoto) > http://www.halowe-graphics.com/music.html (Music Central) > http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=7391019 (web hosting) > http://www.halowe-graphics.com/tinc?key=0TmhZVQ5&formname=web_email > xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> thanks for the reply Stick with minidv, unless your top consideration is quick and easy. The > > i'm looking for a decent camcorder for recreational purposes, i.e. > travel, outdoor activities, etc... > > i think i need it to be compact, long battery running time, reliable, > and good built quality, and my budget is around $500. what's the best > camcorder to fit into above criterion is what i want > Mpg4, or minidisk units will compress your video into a dvd ready format, which tends to make it more difficult to do any detailed editing. But again, if your NOT wanting to do any detailed editing, perhaps just quick cutting and or titles, these new units might fit your needs. But overall, miniDV units will are the most flexible. Minidv is tape format, right?
i'm a novice as of camcorders, i think i saw this mini tape format before, how does this being played in VHS recorder? it's too small to fit in also, from what i researched, it seems that low-light recording is a big problem for many types of camcorders, is it possible to find a camcorder capable of doing recording in low-light condition for under $500? one more question: what's the typical battery life time for the camcorder? can the camcorder be charged using both 110v and 220v AC? i'm asking this because i plan to have a vacational trip to asia by the end of the year. and i want to make sure whatever camcorder i'm getting is compatible with 220v AC used by most asian countries. thanks xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> Minidv is tape format, right? Yes, its the little DV tapes. No, they won't play in a VHS. If you > > i'm a novice as of camcorders, i think i saw this mini tape format > before, how does this being played in VHS recorder? it's too small to > fit in require VHS, then you would need to hook up the video and audio output cables to your camera, hook the other ends to the inputs on your VHS, make sure your VHS is set to record the input from that source and then press play and record on camera and VHS. (VHS! My god man, you can get a cheap DVD player at Kmart for $40!) > also, from what i researched, it seems that low-light recording is a Probably not. The size of the 'chip', which is the light sensitive > big problem for many types of camcorders, is it possible to find a > camcorder capable of doing recording in low-light condition for under > $500? component in the camera is usually proportional to the cost of the camera. I have an older Sony TRV320 which does better in low light than my more expensive GS200. But better is a relative term. A gloomy indoor setting will give me a viewable, but rather grainy picture. > one more question: Maaaaan don't be one of those annoying camcorder tourists!> what's the typical battery life time for the camcorder? can the > camcorder be charged using both 110v and 220v AC? i'm asking this > because i plan to have a vacational trip to asia by the end of the > year. and i want to make sure whatever camcorder i'm getting is > compatible with 220v AC used by most asian countries. > > thanks
for your last comment: i don't know what domain your creative mind has ventured into, but that's certainly not the case here i've bought a 70-210mm f4 camera lens to go with my minolta maxxum 5 camera, having a camcorder will complete my traveling set for sightseeing and touring in eastern asian countries xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> and i want to make sure whatever camcorder i'm getting is The power supplies typically run on 100-240 volts AC input. You just > compatible with 220v AC used by most asian countries. > need the plug adapter for the location. -Bill ok thanks
it sounds similar my IBM thinkpad computer, running on 100-240v AC input with its supplied adapter xiongnu wrote ...
> Minidv is tape format, right? Correct. DV tapes come in two sizes, and "mini-DV" is the smaller size which most small camcorders use. > VHS recorders will play only VHS tapes. Not DV, not> i'm a novice as of camcorders, i think i saw this mini > tape format before, how does this being played in VHS > recorder? it's too small to fit in mini-DV, not 8mm or Hi-8 or D8 or Beta or any other kind of tape format. But then VHS is a dying format, replaced by DVD mostly. > also, from what i researched, it seems that low-light Maybe. You will need to research the camera reviews to> recording is a big problem for many types of camcorders, > is it possible to find a camcorder capable of doing > recording in low-light condition for under $500? find something that has good low-light performance AND under $500. Such a thing MAY not even exist. > one more question: There are too many different camcorders and batteries to> what's the typical battery life time for the camcorder? come up with a "typical" number. I would not buy any camcorder that wouldn't at least shoot a whole (1 hour) tape with a single battery. For many camcorders, there are both OEM and 3rd party batteries that offer extra capacity > can the camcorder be charged using both 110v and Most camcorders come with power supplies/chargers > 220v AC? i'm asking this because i plan to have a > vacational trip to asia by the end of the year. and i > want to make sure whatever camcorder i'm getting is > compatible with 220v AC used by most asian countries. that run on 100-240 V @ 50 or 60 Hz. Because they are switching supplies, they are designed to handle the wide range of international mains power. However never buy something without confirming this for the item you are buying. thank you
if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes? is there a miniDV player or sth? i have read reviews on different camcorders, and found Panasonic PV-GS35 MiniDV Camcorder w/30x Optical Zoom generally received good reviews, amazon.com has it for $458.94, do you think this is a good choice? here's the highlights of the features: Features of the Panasonic PV-GS35: Compact design Still picture capability SD slot 30x optical zoom LED light Color viewfinder 1000x digital zoom Electronic image stabilization 3 hour battery USB 2.0 high speed Motion DV Studio video editing software for PC xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> thank you a) Use the camera as you would a VCR connecting it to the TV.> > if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes? is > there a miniDV player or sth? b) record them to your VCR (as mentioned) c) record them to a DVD recorder (probably the best) d) use the camera's firewire out (I'd not buy a camera without 1394) to transfer the recording to your computer where it can be edited (if you wish) and then burned to a DVD. -Bill Captain Slick wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > You can play your tapes back right from your camera.> xion***@my-deja.com wrote: > > thank you > > > > if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes? is > > there a miniDV player or sth? > > a) Use the camera as you would a VCR connecting it to the TV. > b) record them to your VCR (as mentioned) > c) record them to a DVD recorder (probably the best) > d) use the camera's firewire out (I'd not buy a camera without 1394) to > transfer the recording to your computer where it can be edited (if you > wish) and then burned to a DVD. > > -Bill Or play from your camera into the new Sony VRD -VC10 (stand alone) DVD burner (about $199-$250) for excellent results and you won't need a computer. If you ever tape something newsworthy, you can use a MiniDV to DVPro adapter to transfer directly to news (TV stations) media tape machines. I do it all the time with my DCRVX-2100 MiniDV camera. (List $3100). KM <pobo***@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
Show quoteHide quote news:432904FF.2AF4861@ix.netcom.com... Also if it real newsworthy, they can play anything on tv news, CNN was > Captain Slick wrote: >> >> xion***@my-deja.com wrote: >> > thank you >> > >> > if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes? is >> > there a miniDV player or sth? >> >> a) Use the camera as you would a VCR connecting it to the TV. >> b) record them to your VCR (as mentioned) >> c) record them to a DVD recorder (probably the best) >> d) use the camera's firewire out (I'd not buy a camera without 1394) to >> transfer the recording to your computer where it can be edited (if you >> wish) and then burned to a DVD. >> >> -Bill > > You can play your tapes back right from your camera. > > Or play from your camera into the new Sony VRD -VC10 > (stand alone) DVD burner (about $199-$250) for excellent > results and you won't need a computer. > > If you ever tape something newsworthy, you can use a > MiniDV to DVPro adapter to transfer directly to news (TV stations) > media tape machines. I do it all the time with my DCRVX-2100 > MiniDV camera. (List $3100). > > KM showing videocaptured on people's cell phones! Can you imagine the poor video quality of a cell phone being broadcast on nationwide news? They cropped it with a black border and cleaned it up as best they could but you still seen compression effects big time, but if newsworthy, who cares! :) AnthonyR.<xion***@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1126629574.720557.89470@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... There are miniDV decks, but they're very expensive. Most non-European Union> thank you > > if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes? is > there a miniDV player or sth? miniDV camcorders will play back like a VCR -- they have video adn audio outputs, and you just plug them into your television. However, many people capture the video to their computer, edit it, add titles and effects, and then burn it to DVD. > I don't know enough about it, sorry.> i have read reviews on different camcorders, and found Panasonic > PV-GS35 MiniDV Camcorder w/30x Optical Zoom generally received good > reviews, amazon.com has it for > $458.94, do you think this is a good choice? Show quoteHide quote > > here's the highlights of the features: > > Features of the Panasonic PV-GS35: > > Compact design > Still picture capability > SD slot > 30x optical zoom > LED light > Color viewfinder > 1000x digital zoom > Electronic image stabilization > 3 hour battery > USB 2.0 high speed > Motion DV Studio video editing software for PC >
What To Do with my DV Recordings?
still phote from video Mitsubishi WD52725 - 480p DVD video problems - please help LCD televisions and background humming noise Sony DCR-HC1000 overexposure TMPGenc bitrate/audio questions... Sony TRV-33 no TTL video problem JVC MiniDV AUDIO problem Re: popular format ? panasonic camcorder tape loading fault |
|||||||||||||||||||||||