Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

best camcorder for under $500

Author
9 Sep 2005 2:14 PM
xiongnu
hi,

could anyone recommend a good camcorder?  i'm looking for one in the
price range of $500 or less

thanks

Author
9 Sep 2005 3:23 PM
RS
xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> hi,
>
> could anyone recommend a good camcorder?  i'm looking for one in the
> price range of $500 or less
>
> thanks
>
www.camcorderinfo.com has many good camcorder reviews. Good place to start.
Author
9 Sep 2005 4:26 PM
David Chien
A Cheap one!
    Sharp VL-Z3U and similar models for <$180 on ebay.com
    Solid, basic camcorder. Just don't expect a lot of video resolution
here.

A cheap 3CCD!
    Fry's electronics in CA, CircuitCity and GoodGuys open-box and end
of season models, etc.
    Can easily get a Panasonic 3CCD for <$500.  Much better video
resolution vs. the common lot of Sony, Panasonic, etc. DV camcorders
with 1CCD for the consumer sold in stores today.

A cheap DVD model!
    See www.fatwallet.com/c/18/ and search for 'hitachi dvd'.  That one
website authorized by Hitachi to sell their refurbished DVD camcorders
at $300-$350 is a steal vs. the $600+ they normally go for.

A flash-card based model!
    Rather than going tape, try tapeless!  The latest digital cameras
(Casio 7MP model, etc.; Sanyo Xacti C4/C5 models; Sony DSC-M1 model;
That one Samsung sold at BestBuy) etc. all record in MPEG-4 640x480
30fps format to flash cards.
    Far lighter than any camcorder, shock proof (no moving parts), and
offers quicker transfer to the PC for editing than tape - these digital
camcorders also offer built-in 4+MP digital camera capability, and much
more.
    Really the wave of the future, and you really get much nicer quality
off these than most cheap 1CCD camcorders sold today.

That CVS pharmacy store model for $25 or so.
    Search the web for hacks on modifying this one-time-use camcorder
for multiple uses, your own downloads to your PC, mods to let it record
in 640x480 resolution, etc.
    Really nice if you're thinking of attaching the camcorder to a toy
plane or remote controlled toy and don't want to crash a $$$$$ camcorder.
Author
9 Sep 2005 5:19 PM
PTravel
"David Chien" <chie***@uci.edu> wrote in message
news:dfscvl$dst$1@news.service.uci.edu...
> A Cheap one!
>     Sharp VL-Z3U and similar models for <$180 on ebay.com
>     Solid, basic camcorder. Just don't expect a lot of video resolution
> here.
>
> A cheap 3CCD!
>     Fry's electronics in CA, CircuitCity and GoodGuys open-box and end
> of season models, etc.
>     Can easily get a Panasonic 3CCD for <$500.  Much better video
> resolution vs. the common lot of Sony, Panasonic, etc. DV camcorders
> with 1CCD for the consumer sold in stores today.

Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better video
than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models.  Small sensors, cheap
glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how many
sensors there are.

>
> A cheap DVD model!
>     See www.fatwallet.com/c/18/ and search for 'hitachi dvd'.  That one
> website authorized by Hitachi to sell their refurbished DVD camcorders
> at $300-$350 is a steal vs. the $600+ they normally go for.

DVD camcorders are consumer toys designed for people who have no interest in
producing quality video.  They are the worst of the lot.

>
> A flash-card based model!
>     Rather than going tape, try tapeless!  The latest digital cameras
> (Casio 7MP model, etc.; Sanyo Xacti C4/C5 models; Sony DSC-M1 model;
> That one Samsung sold at BestBuy) etc. all record in MPEG-4 640x480
> 30fps format to flash cards.

I assume when the OP used the word "best" it was because he was interested
in something that would produce the best video.  These silly toys barely
produce video at all.

>     Far lighter than any camcorder, shock proof (no moving parts), and
> offers quicker transfer to the PC for editing than tape - these digital
> camcorders also offer built-in 4+MP digital camera capability, and much
> more.

What they don't offer is decent video quality.

>     Really the wave of the future,

Only the far, far future.  Tape will continue to dominate for at least the
next decade.

> and you really get much nicer quality
> off these than most cheap 1CCD camcorders sold today.

Completely untrue.

>
> That CVS pharmacy store model for $25 or so.

You've got to be kidding.  The OP asked about camcorders, not toys.

Show quoteHide quote
>     Search the web for hacks on modifying this one-time-use camcorder
> for multiple uses, your own downloads to your PC, mods to let it record
> in 640x480 resolution, etc.
>     Really nice if you're thinking of attaching the camcorder to a toy
> plane or remote controlled toy and don't want to crash a $$$$$ camcorder.
Author
9 Sep 2005 9:26 PM
RS
PTravel wrote:

>
>
> Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better video
> than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models.  Small sensors, cheap
> glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how many
> sensors there are.

Granted, but the Pannasonic GS200 produces a very nice video. It is, as
most every review will tell you, not very good in low light, but in
daylight or a well light indoor setting, it will produce an excellent
video with clear and vibrant colors. For under $800, its probably
cheaper than the to of the line one chippers.

RS
Author
9 Sep 2005 9:50 PM
PTravel
Show quote Hide quote
"RS" <m***@mail.com> wrote in message news:4321fb66$1_3@newspeer2.tds.net...
> PTravel wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better video
> > than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models.  Small sensors, cheap
> > glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how
many
> > sensors there are.
>
> Granted, but the Pannasonic GS200 produces a very nice video. It is, as
> most every review will tell you, not very good in low light, but in
> daylight or a well light indoor setting, it will produce an excellent
> video with clear and vibrant colors. For under $800, its probably
> cheaper than the to of the line one chippers.

Most any miniDV camcorder will produce good video in bright daylight.  It is
cheaper than the top-of-the-line single chippers, but I haven't seen
anything which suggests it is comparable.


Show quoteHide quote
>
> RS
Author
12 Sep 2005 2:05 PM
RS
PTravel wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> "RS" <m***@mail.com> wrote in message news:4321fb66$1_3@newspeer2.tds.net...
>
>>PTravel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better video
>>>than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models.  Small sensors, cheap
>>>glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how
>
> many
>
>>>sensors there are.
>>
>>Granted, but the Pannasonic GS200 produces a very nice video. It is, as
>>most every review will tell you, not very good in low light, but in
>>daylight or a well light indoor setting, it will produce an excellent
>>video with clear and vibrant colors. For under $800, its probably
>>cheaper than the to of the line one chippers.
>
>
> Most any miniDV camcorder will produce good video in bright daylight.  It is
> cheaper than the top-of-the-line single chippers, but I haven't seen
> anything which suggests it is comparable.
>
>
>

Again, you are technically right, which of course is the best kind of
right to be.

So, how much are you spending on this top of the line one chipper? It's
all find and good to compare, but when it comes to pulling out the
wallet, things suddenly become relative.

Did a little two camera shoot a week ago. One camera was a GL1 from the
cable access studio and the other my GS200. After looking at the
footable of the two side by side, my crew and I agreed that the GS200
was slightly more vibrant, but also a tiny bit hotter. We felt however
that we could have eliminated that had we had the time to do manual
exposure control. The GL-1, while softer on the colors, had a slight
tendency to overexpose one on reflections, such as light off a bald
persons head, but again, we can compensate for this in post, or could
have eliminated it had we had time to do detailed setting of the studio
lights.

So, yeah, I think it's actually comparable. And as its at least a
thousand less than anything considered 'top', and since I'm not a making
any money doing video, its what you call the best bang for the buck.
Author
12 Sep 2005 2:29 PM
PTravel
Show quote Hide quote
"RS" <m***@mail.com> wrote in message news:4325888c_1@newspeer2.tds.net...
> PTravel wrote:
> > "RS" <m***@mail.com> wrote in message
news:4321fb66$1_3@newspeer2.tds.net...
> >
> >>PTravel wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Panasonic's bottom-of-the-line 3CCD machines do not produce better
video
> >>>than Sony and Canon's top-of-the-line 1CCD models.  Small sensors,
cheap
> >>>glass and crappy electronics will produce bad video, regardless of how
> >
> > many
> >
> >>>sensors there are.
> >>
> >>Granted, but the Pannasonic GS200 produces a very nice video. It is, as
> >>most every review will tell you, not very good in low light, but in
> >>daylight or a well light indoor setting, it will produce an excellent
> >>video with clear and vibrant colors. For under $800, its probably
> >>cheaper than the to of the line one chippers.
> >
> >
> > Most any miniDV camcorder will produce good video in bright daylight.
It is
> > cheaper than the top-of-the-line single chippers, but I haven't seen
> > anything which suggests it is comparable.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Again, you are technically right, which of course is the best kind of
> right to be.
>
> So, how much are you spending on this top of the line one chipper? It's
> all find and good to compare, but when it comes to pulling out the
> wallet, things suddenly become relative.

I don't have one, but I understand they are in the $1200-1500 range.


>
> Did a little two camera shoot a week ago. One camera was a GL1 from the
> cable access studio and the other my GS200. After looking at the
> footable of the two side by side, my crew and I agreed that the GS200
> was slightly more vibrant, but also a tiny bit hotter.

The GL1 is not a good camcorder.  The GL2, on the other hand, will do much
better than a GS200.  A VX2100/PD170 will do far better than all of them.

Show quoteHide quote
> We felt however
> that we could have eliminated that had we had the time to do manual
> exposure control. The GL-1, while softer on the colors, had a slight
> tendency to overexpose one on reflections, such as light off a bald
> persons head, but again, we can compensate for this in post, or could
> have eliminated it had we had time to do detailed setting of the studio
> lights.
>
> So, yeah, I think it's actually comparable
> And as its at least a
> thousand less than anything considered 'top', and since I'm not a making
> any money doing video, its what you call the best bang for the buck.
>
>
Author
10 Sep 2005 6:38 AM
xiongnu
thanks for the reply

i'm looking for a decent camcorder for recreational purposes, i.e.
travel, outdoor activities, etc...

i think i need it to be compact, long battery running time, reliable,
and good built quality, and my budget is around $500.  what's the best
camcorder to fit into above criterion is what i want
Author
10 Sep 2005 12:00 PM
Hal Lowe
On 9 Sep 2005 23:38:21 -0700, xion***@my-deja.com wrote:

>thanks for the reply
>
>i'm looking for a decent camcorder for recreational purposes, i.e.
>travel, outdoor activities, etc...
>
>i think i need it to be compact, long battery running time, reliable,
>and good built quality, and my budget is around $500.  what's the best
>camcorder to fit into above criterion is what i want

If someone already has suggested this, my apologies.   Anyway, check
out the new Sanyo VPC-C5.  Here's a review at Steve's Digicams:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/c5.html

In addition to MPEG4 videos, it also take 5 megapixel stills.  If you
shop around you should be able to find it in your price range.

Good luck!

Hal Lowe

http://www.halogos.com (logo t-shirts, mugs, etc.)
(make sure to check out the digiphoto t-shirts)
http://www.halowe-graphics.com/photo.html (digiPhoto)
http://www.halowe-graphics.com/music.html (Music Central)
http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=7391019 (web hosting)
http://www.halowe-graphics.com/tinc?key=0TmhZVQ5&formname=web_email
Author
10 Sep 2005 12:26 PM
PTravel
Show quote Hide quote
"Hal Lowe" <hall***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uei5i1dmq6oem3ev61o42rf54s4mudo9t8@4ax.com...
> On 9 Sep 2005 23:38:21 -0700, xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> >thanks for the reply
> >
> >i'm looking for a decent camcorder for recreational purposes, i.e.
> >travel, outdoor activities, etc...
> >
> >i think i need it to be compact, long battery running time, reliable,
> >and good built quality, and my budget is around $500.  what's the best
> >camcorder to fit into above criterion is what i want
>
> If someone already has suggested this, my apologies.   Anyway, check
> out the new Sanyo VPC-C5.  Here's a review at Steve's Digicams:
>
> http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/c5.html

The camera compresses to mpeg4 on the fly, resulting in poorer quality video
than you'd get from a miniDV machine.  In addition, the resulting video
can't be edited, with re-transcoding to some other format -- certainly none
of the "mainstream" editors can handle mpeg4.  Add to that the fact that,
judging from the lens size, the sensors must be microscopic and of
ridiculously high-density, and it's going to have horrendous low-light
performance.


Show quoteHide quote
>
> In addition to MPEG4 videos, it also take 5 megapixel stills.  If you
> shop around you should be able to find it in your price range.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Hal Lowe
>
> http://www.halogos.com (logo t-shirts, mugs, etc.)
> (make sure to check out the digiphoto t-shirts)
> http://www.halowe-graphics.com/photo.html (digiPhoto)
> http://www.halowe-graphics.com/music.html (Music Central)
> http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=7391019 (web hosting)
> http://www.halowe-graphics.com/tinc?key=0TmhZVQ5&formname=web_email
>
Author
12 Sep 2005 2:09 PM
RS
xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> thanks for the reply
>
> i'm looking for a decent camcorder for recreational purposes, i.e.
> travel, outdoor activities, etc...
>
> i think i need it to be compact, long battery running time, reliable,
> and good built quality, and my budget is around $500.  what's the best
> camcorder to fit into above criterion is what i want
>

Stick with minidv, unless your top consideration is quick and easy. The
Mpg4, or minidisk units will compress your video into a dvd ready
format, which tends to make it more difficult to do any detailed editing.

But again, if your NOT wanting to do any detailed editing, perhaps just
quick cutting and or titles, these new units might fit your needs. But
overall, miniDV units will are the most flexible.
Author
13 Sep 2005 1:08 PM
xiongnu
Minidv is tape format, right?

i'm a novice as of camcorders,  i think i saw this mini tape format
before, how does this being played in VHS recorder?  it's too small to
fit in

also, from what i researched, it seems that low-light recording is a
big problem for many types of  camcorders, is it possible to find a
camcorder capable of doing recording in low-light condition for under
$500?

one more question:
what's the typical battery life time for the camcorder?  can the
camcorder be charged using both 110v and 220v AC?  i'm asking this
because i plan to have a vacational trip to asia by the end of the
year.  and i want to make sure whatever camcorder i'm getting is
compatible with 220v AC used by most asian countries.


thanks
Author
13 Sep 2005 1:49 PM
RS
xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> Minidv is tape format, right?
>
> i'm a novice as of camcorders,  i think i saw this mini tape format
> before, how does this being played in VHS recorder?  it's too small to
> fit in

Yes, its the little DV tapes. No, they won't play in a VHS. If you
require VHS, then you would need to hook up the video and audio output
cables to your camera, hook the other ends to the inputs on your VHS,
make sure your VHS is set to record the input from that source and then
press play and record on camera and VHS. (VHS! My god man, you can get a
cheap DVD player at Kmart for $40!)


> also, from what i researched, it seems that low-light recording is a
> big problem for many types of  camcorders, is it possible to find a
> camcorder capable of doing recording in low-light condition for under
> $500?

Probably not. The size of the 'chip', which is the light sensitive
component in the camera is usually proportional to the cost of the
camera. I have an older Sony TRV320 which does better in low light than
my more expensive GS200. But better is a relative term. A gloomy indoor
setting will give me a viewable, but rather grainy picture.



> one more question:
> what's the typical battery life time for the camcorder?  can the
> camcorder be charged using both 110v and 220v AC?  i'm asking this
> because i plan to have a vacational trip to asia by the end of the
> year.  and i want to make sure whatever camcorder i'm getting is
> compatible with 220v AC used by most asian countries.
>
>

Maaaaan don't be one of those annoying camcorder tourists!
Author
13 Sep 2005 3:49 PM
xiongnu
thanks

for your last comment:
i don't know what domain your creative mind has ventured into, but
that's certainly not the case here

i've bought a 70-210mm f4 camera lens to go with my minolta maxxum 5
camera, having a camcorder will complete my traveling set for
sightseeing and touring in eastern asian countries
Author
13 Sep 2005 3:00 PM
Captain Slick
xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> and i want to make sure whatever camcorder i'm getting is
> compatible with 220v AC used by most asian countries.
>

The power supplies typically run on 100-240 volts AC input. You just
need the plug adapter for the location.

       -Bill
Author
13 Sep 2005 3:51 PM
xiongnu
ok thanks

it sounds similar my IBM thinkpad computer, running on 100-240v AC
input with its supplied adapter
Author
13 Sep 2005 3:21 PM
Richard Crowley
xiongnu wrote ...
> Minidv is tape format, right?

Correct. DV tapes come in two sizes, and "mini-DV" is the
smaller size which most small camcorders use.
>
> i'm a novice as of camcorders,  i think i saw this mini
> tape format before, how does this being played in VHS
> recorder?  it's too small to fit in

VHS recorders will play only VHS tapes. Not DV, not
mini-DV, not 8mm or Hi-8 or D8 or Beta or any other
kind of tape format.

But then VHS is a dying format, replaced by DVD mostly.

> also, from what i researched, it seems that low-light
> recording is a big problem for many types of  camcorders,
> is it possible to find a camcorder capable of doing
> recording in low-light condition for under  $500?

Maybe. You will need to research the camera reviews to
find something that has good low-light performance AND
under $500.  Such a thing MAY not even exist.

> one more question:
> what's the typical battery life time for the camcorder? 

There are too many different camcorders and batteries to
come up with a "typical" number.  I would not buy any
camcorder that wouldn't at least shoot a whole (1 hour)
tape with a single battery. For many camcorders, there
are both OEM and 3rd party batteries that offer extra
capacity

> can the camcorder be charged using both 110v and
> 220v AC?  i'm asking this because i plan to have a
> vacational trip to asia by the end of the year.  and i
> want to make sure whatever camcorder i'm getting is
> compatible with 220v AC used by most asian countries.

Most camcorders come with power supplies/chargers
that run on 100-240 V @ 50 or 60 Hz. Because they
are switching supplies, they are designed to handle the
wide range of international mains power. However
never buy something without confirming this for the
item you are buying.
Author
13 Sep 2005 4:39 PM
xiongnu
thank you

if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes?  is
there a miniDV player or sth?

i have read reviews on different camcorders, and found Panasonic
PV-GS35 MiniDV Camcorder w/30x Optical Zoom generally received good
reviews, amazon.com has it for
$458.94,  do you think this is a good choice?

here's the highlights of the features:

Features of the Panasonic PV-GS35:

Compact design
Still picture capability
SD slot
30x optical zoom
LED light
Color viewfinder
1000x digital zoom
Electronic image stabilization
3 hour battery
USB 2.0 high speed
Motion DV Studio video editing software for PC
Author
13 Sep 2005 5:10 PM
Captain Slick
xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> thank you
>
> if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes?  is
> there a miniDV player or sth?

a) Use the camera as you would a VCR connecting it to the TV.
b) record them to your VCR (as mentioned)
c) record them to a DVD recorder (probably the best)
d) use the camera's firewire out (I'd not buy a camera without 1394) to
transfer the recording to your computer where it can be edited (if you
wish) and then burned to a DVD.

        -Bill
Author
15 Sep 2005 5:22 AM
poboxdc
Captain Slick wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
>
> xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
> > thank you
> >
> > if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes?  is
> > there a miniDV player or sth?
>
> a) Use the camera as you would a VCR connecting it to the TV.
> b) record them to your VCR (as mentioned)
> c) record them to a DVD recorder (probably the best)
> d) use the camera's firewire out (I'd not buy a camera without 1394) to
> transfer the recording to your computer where it can be edited (if you
> wish) and then burned to a DVD.
>
>         -Bill

You can play your tapes back right from your camera.

Or play from your camera into the new Sony VRD -VC10
(stand alone) DVD burner (about $199-$250) for excellent
results and you won't need a computer.

If you ever tape something newsworthy, you can use a
MiniDV to DVPro adapter to transfer directly to news (TV stations)
media tape machines. I do it all the time with my DCRVX-2100
MiniDV camera. (List $3100).

KM
Author
15 Sep 2005 5:15 PM
AnthonyR
<pobo***@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
Show quoteHide quote
news:432904FF.2AF4861@ix.netcom.com...
> Captain Slick wrote:
>>
>> xion***@my-deja.com wrote:
>> > thank you
>> >
>> > if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes?  is
>> > there a miniDV player or sth?
>>
>> a) Use the camera as you would a VCR connecting it to the TV.
>> b) record them to your VCR (as mentioned)
>> c) record them to a DVD recorder (probably the best)
>> d) use the camera's firewire out (I'd not buy a camera without 1394) to
>> transfer the recording to your computer where it can be edited (if you
>> wish) and then burned to a DVD.
>>
>>         -Bill
>
> You can play your tapes back right from your camera.
>
> Or play from your camera into the new Sony VRD -VC10
> (stand alone) DVD burner (about $199-$250) for excellent
> results and you won't need a computer.
>
> If you ever tape something newsworthy, you can use a
> MiniDV to DVPro adapter to transfer directly to news (TV stations)
> media tape machines. I do it all the time with my DCRVX-2100
> MiniDV camera. (List $3100).
>
> KM

Also if it real newsworthy, they can play anything on tv news, CNN was
showing videocaptured on people's cell phones!
Can you imagine the poor video quality of a cell phone being broadcast on
nationwide news?
They cropped it with a black border and cleaned it up as best they could but
you still seen compression effects big time,
but if newsworthy, who cares!
:)

AnthonyR.
Author
15 Sep 2005 4:41 AM
PTravel
<xion***@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1126629574.720557.89470@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> thank you
>
> if not through VHS, then how do i playback these miniDV tapes?  is
> there a miniDV player or sth?

There are miniDV decks, but they're very expensive.  Most non-European Union
miniDV camcorders will play back like a VCR -- they have video adn audio
outputs, and you just plug them into your television.

However, many people capture the video to their computer, edit it, add
titles and effects, and then burn it to DVD.

>
> i have read reviews on different camcorders, and found Panasonic
> PV-GS35 MiniDV Camcorder w/30x Optical Zoom generally received good
> reviews, amazon.com has it for
> $458.94,  do you think this is a good choice?

I don't know enough about it, sorry.

Show quoteHide quote
>
> here's the highlights of the features:
>
> Features of the Panasonic PV-GS35:
>
> Compact design
> Still picture capability
> SD slot
> 30x optical zoom
> LED light
> Color viewfinder
> 1000x digital zoom
> Electronic image stabilization
> 3 hour battery
> USB 2.0 high speed
> Motion DV Studio video editing software for PC
>
Author
10 Sep 2005 7:13 AM
xiongnu
thank you

that's very helpful