|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Analog8 playback w/Digital8 cam looks sharper but also grainier...
TRV240 Digital8 camcorder. As advertised it does in fact play the tapes through any of the outputs - S-Video, Firewire or analog. However what I've discovered is that while the image looks sharper than the output of an analog 8 playing the same tape, the snow or noise in low light conditions looks more pronounced than the same material output through an analog cam. Of course, with a brightly lit subject, the Digital8 cam yields a clearly better image. I wonder if all things considered, on more poorly lit subjects, I'm better off capturing the output from an analog cam since it softens the graininess, though the overall image isn't as sharp. Btw, why doesn't the analog camera playback as well as it apparently records? "Doc" wrote ...
Show quoteHide quote > I've been experimenting with playback of analog 8mm tapes through a It appears that the D8 camcorder has a better playback frequency> Sony > TRV240 Digital8 camcorder. As advertised it does in fact play the > tapes > through any of the outputs - S-Video, Firewire or analog. However what > I've > discovered is that while the image looks sharper than the output of an > analog 8 playing the same tape, the snow or noise in low light > conditions > looks more pronounced than the same material output through an analog > cam. > Of course, with a brightly lit subject, the Digital8 cam yields a > clearly > better image. > > I wonder if all things considered, on more poorly lit subjects, I'm > better > off capturing the output from an analog cam since it softens the > graininess, > though the overall image isn't as sharp. > > Btw, why doesn't the analog camera playback as well as it apparently > records? response (ability to reproduce fine detail). Doesn't seem all that unusual since it is a subsequent generation and progress marches on. Of course this is a two-edged sword as it reproduces the video noise along with the desired picture detail. Ironically, even as electronics improves, the quality of the camera (image pickup) part of camcorders may be going south. This is observed even in DV camcorders as "featureitis" takes over and fundamental image quality takes a back seat to bells & whistles like megapixel still imaging, etc. There are certain camcorder models (no longer made) that in hindsight were at the apex of performance while newer models are disappointments (i.e. Sony TRV900 vs TRV950, etc.) While none of the 8mm (analog or digital) camcorders were noted for extraordinary camera performance, it wouldn't surprise me if your "vintage" analog 8 may have a better camera than the D8 :-(
$300 for 'Wire'
(again) Monster cable alternatives, and is it all worth it anyway. Dirt cheap "helmet cams" ...? Video Editor for DVDs Will HDTV channel look better than Standard-Def channel on Standard-Def TV? HELP! Sony SB-V55A Switcher: fuzzy from composite->S-Video Transferring digital video from camcorder to PC via Firewire I_can=B4t_capture_Digital_Video_in_Fire_wire. Low end DV camcorder with real manual exposure? Mix composite and S-Video |
|||||||||||||||||||||||