|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Budget camcorder with least digital artifacting?
I am looking to buy my first digital camcorder. I am aware that most of the single CCD cameras have problems with digital artifcating, especially aliasing which can be quite annoying. I understand that most of these problems could be avoided with 3 CCD camcorders, which are expensive. Could somebody recommend a camcorder in the $500 - $700 range with minimal artifacting, aliasing problems? How are Canon Elura 80/85/90 and Sony DCR-HC 30/40 ? Thank you in advance The problems you mention (digital artifacts, aliasing and I'll add "poor
resolution and low-light performance") have more to do with poor camera design and SMALL CCD's, not necessarily the number of CCD's. (though generally 3 chip is better than 1... I'll take a single 1/2 or 3/4 inch chip over three 1/6 inchers...) In your budget, my recommendation is BUY USED. Even at double or triple your budget - buy used. You can get low-time miniDV and Digital8mm cameras DIRT CHEAP with a bit of looking. The picture quality of a Sony TRV120, 320, 520 or 720 from 3 or 4 years ago - at between $200 and $300 - is better than most of what's on the shelf at Bestbuy for three times the price. All of those models are Digital8, a format that uses "Hi-8" 8mm video tape. The tapes (and cameras) are physically larger than most miniDV cams but the *data* stored is identical. (I'd like to hear comments on the previous generation TRV6, TRV11, TRV20 etc - I hear they do great jobs too) Now, if you have a bit more money and want to jump up in picture quality, look for a used Sony TRV900, 3-CCD (seen for as little as $800 on eBay though usually more) which is miniDV and orders of magnitude better than anything available now for under $2,000 new. Many would argue it's a professional/prosumer camera that was marketed as a consumer camera. Personally, I'd recommend you up your budget to $800 or $900 and get the TRV900. You WON'T be disappointed with that camera. Next jump up is a $1,300 to $1,500 used Sony VX-2000. Though labelled a "consumer" or "pro-sumer" cam, it (with a PD150) was used to shoot the Lion's Gate movie "Open Water." I don't think much more has to be said about it than that. Low-light performance of a VX2000 or PD150 beats anything in it's class. Others to consider in the VX' class include: Canon GL1, XL1, XL1S, Panasonic DVX-100 & DVC-80. Anything beyond that, you're in to new or very high-end used professional cameras. Hope this helps. C. <gsmgsm***@bumerang.ro> wrote in message Show quoteHide quote news:1115176703.295794.220810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Hi, > > I am looking to buy my first digital camcorder. I am aware that most of > the single CCD cameras have problems with digital artifcating, > especially aliasing which can be quite annoying. I understand that most > of these problems could be avoided with 3 CCD camcorders, which are > expensive. > > Could somebody recommend a camcorder in the $500 - $700 range with > minimal artifacting, aliasing problems? > > How are Canon Elura 80/85/90 and Sony DCR-HC 30/40 ? > > Thank you in advance > gsmgsm***@bumerang.ro writes:
> Could somebody recommend a camcorder in the $500 - $700 range with Get a hi-8 camera, no digital artifacts at all.> minimal artifacting, aliasing problems?
Generation loss with DV?
NLE? Is there LE? Video XFer to Laptop - Firewire or USB? Do Camcorders do true 16x9? Storing magnetic tapes: best local conditions? anyone buy one of these reflectors? sit-rep ... camera in pieces Windows XP not seeing my DV camera Re: NLE? Is there LE? Stopwatch for video editing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||