|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Sony HDV Camcorder
Part of the Qualia line, priced at about $5,800 and will be available in "spring". "Charles C. Shyu" <charles_s***@nymc.edu> writes: Looks just like their existing HDV camera, the HDR-FX1. Any idea what> http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/5881 > > Part of the Qualia line, priced at about $5,800 and will be available in > "spring". the diffs are? >> http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/5881 In addition to an extra $2,000 in price, the press release does mention a >> >> Part of the Qualia line, priced at about $5,800 and will be available in >> "spring". > > Looks just like their existing HDV camera, the HDR-FX1. Any idea what > the diffs are? "specialized for QUALIA" Carl Zeiss lens. I'm surprised www.camcorderinfo.com hasn't picked up the story yet... >> http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/5881 Also:>> >> Part of the Qualia line, priced at about $5,800 and will be available in >> "spring". > > Looks just like their existing HDV camera, the HDR-FX1. Any idea what > the diffs are? http://www.tomshardware.com/hardnews/20050424_173209.html A BIT more info, and a tantalizing pic... <chuckle>
This is clearly a reaction to Panasonic's proposed AG-HVX200. http://dvestore.com/theatre/ http://tinyurl.com/am7j6 We'll see who gets to market first... C.j Show quoteHide quote "Charles C. Shyu" <charles_s***@nymc.edu> wrote in message news:8nUae.12922$go4.8183@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... > http://news.sel.sony.com/pressrelease/5881 > > Part of the Qualia line, priced at about $5,800 and will be available in > "spring". > -- > Charles C. Shyu > http://home.earthlink.net/~shyuc/shyu.html > "C.J.Patten" <cjpatten@KNOWSPAMrogers.com> writes: Heh, according to the second url, the Sony HD camcorders don't support> This is clearly a reaction to Panasonic's proposed AG-HVX200. > http://dvestore.com/theatre/ > http://tinyurl.com/am7j6 > > We'll see who gets to market first... 24p. That's pretty stupid. Why would anyone buy a $6000 HD camcorder if they weren't going to shoot in 24p? Surely not to make home videos of their cat to play on their widescreen TV? The Panasonic thing seems nuts too. Why record to flash card? It would make more sense if they put an iPod-like hard disc into the camera (60GB or whatever), or let you record directly to an external Firewire disc (e.g. iPod). I don't know if any cameras currently let you do that. We're in the middle of a big discussion about the proposed Panny on the
Google DV-L list right now. I won't repeat it here but it's worth a cruise on over. C.j Show quoteHide quote "Paul Rubin" <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote in message news:7x64yb8ubo.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com... > "C.J.Patten" <cjpatten@KNOWSPAMrogers.com> writes: >> This is clearly a reaction to Panasonic's proposed AG-HVX200. >> http://dvestore.com/theatre/ >> http://tinyurl.com/am7j6 >> >> We'll see who gets to market first... > > Heh, according to the second url, the Sony HD camcorders don't support > 24p. That's pretty stupid. Why would anyone buy a $6000 HD camcorder > if they weren't going to shoot in 24p? Surely not to make home videos > of their cat to play on their widescreen TV? > > The Panasonic thing seems nuts too. Why record to flash card? It > would make more sense if they put an iPod-like hard disc into the > camera (60GB or whatever), or let you record directly to an external > Firewire disc (e.g. iPod). I don't know if any cameras currently let > you do that. 
Other interesting topics
HACK THE PLANET! (or how to destroy a Sony D8 camera)
Is there a Faq on buying camcorders? Sony TRV-280 Camcorder - USB 1.0 or 2.0 streaming? USB vs Firewire SONY TRV-280 HandyCam Camcorder - Sound Lag Help DVD to CD-R Audio Track Problem with Videowave 7 Magnavox service menu adjustment for overscan? Re: Sending high-resolution video over a coaxial cable? Spanking Disciples |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
