Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

USB vs Firewire

Author
23 Apr 2005 6:57 PM
Bradley
Okay, It seems my USB cable is too slow to transfer full quality video from
camcorder to harddrive without getting sound lag in the video so I have been
told I might need to stream video using the firewire. I went to look at some
firewire cables on BestBuy and some of them are actually "slower" than some
of the USB cables. So what's going on here? Im wondering if my USB 2.0
driver is on. I think I have it turned off in the BIOS because my computer
kept freezing. I'll look into this. Thanks for any other tips/comments.

Author
23 Apr 2005 7:37 PM
C.J.Patten
Firewire 400 is rated at 400 megabits per second.
USB2 is rated at 480 megabits per second.

Don't for a second believe that has anything to do with anything.

Firewire isn't processor dependant and IS designed for video. USB is not.

Just about any cheap, $30 firewire 400 card will do what you need.
There's firewire 800 (800 megabit/sec) but don't bother. No consumer devices
use it.

Google search on "firewire versus USB video".

C.j


Show quoteHide quote
"Bradley" <bnor***@kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lUwae.34224$PA4.29796@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> Okay, It seems my USB cable is too slow to transfer full quality video
> from camcorder to harddrive without getting sound lag in the video so I
> have been told I might need to stream video using the firewire. I went to
> look at some firewire cables on BestBuy and some of them are actually
> "slower" than some of the USB cables. So what's going on here? Im
> wondering if my USB 2.0 driver is on. I think I have it turned off in the
> BIOS because my computer kept freezing. I'll look into this. Thanks for
> any other tips/comments.
>
Author
24 Apr 2005 2:40 AM
Bradley
Thanks for the help. It seems firewire is the way to go for streaming DVD
quality video to hard drive. I must get me a cable.

Show quoteHide quote
"C.J.Patten" <cjpatten@KNOWSPAMrogers.com> wrote in message
news:zY-dnTu15rBEPvffRVn-sQ@rogers.com...
> Firewire 400 is rated at 400 megabits per second.
> USB2 is rated at 480 megabits per second.
>
> Don't for a second believe that has anything to do with anything.
>
> Firewire isn't processor dependant and IS designed for video. USB is not.
>
> Just about any cheap, $30 firewire 400 card will do what you need.
> There's firewire 800 (800 megabit/sec) but don't bother. No consumer
> devices use it.
>
> Google search on "firewire versus USB video".
>
> C.j
>
>
> "Bradley" <bnor***@kc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:lUwae.34224$PA4.29796@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>> Okay, It seems my USB cable is too slow to transfer full quality video
>> from camcorder to harddrive without getting sound lag in the video so I
>> have been told I might need to stream video using the firewire. I went to
>> look at some firewire cables on BestBuy and some of them are actually
>> "slower" than some of the USB cables. So what's going on here? Im
>> wondering if my USB 2.0 driver is on. I think I have it turned off in the
>> BIOS because my computer kept freezing. I'll look into this. Thanks for
>> any other tips/comments.
>>
>
>
Author
25 Apr 2005 1:42 AM
Netmask
my firewire dvd burner users firewire 800 and it's a commercial unit
it really flies in comparison to USB and Firewire 400

Show quoteHide quote
"C.J.Patten" <cjpatten@KNOWSPAMrogers.com> wrote in message
news:zY-dnTu15rBEPvffRVn-sQ@rogers.com...
> Firewire 400 is rated at 400 megabits per second.
> USB2 is rated at 480 megabits per second.
>
> Don't for a second believe that has anything to do with anything.
>
> Firewire isn't processor dependant and IS designed for video. USB is not.
>
> Just about any cheap, $30 firewire 400 card will do what you need.
> There's firewire 800 (800 megabit/sec) but don't bother. No consumer
> devices use it.
>
> Google search on "firewire versus USB video".
>
> C.j
>
>
> "Bradley" <bnor***@kc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:lUwae.34224$PA4.29796@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>> Okay, It seems my USB cable is too slow to transfer full quality video
>> from camcorder to harddrive without getting sound lag in the video so I
>> have been told I might need to stream video using the firewire. I went to
>> look at some firewire cables on BestBuy and some of them are actually
>> "slower" than some of the USB cables. So what's going on here? Im
>> wondering if my USB 2.0 driver is on. I think I have it turned off in the
>> BIOS because my computer kept freezing. I'll look into this. Thanks for
>> any other tips/comments.
>>
>
>
Author
23 Apr 2005 8:28 PM
PTRAVEL
"Bradley" <bnor***@kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:lUwae.34224$PA4.29796@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> Okay, It seems my USB cable is too slow to transfer full quality video
> from camcorder to harddrive without getting sound lag in the video so I
> have been told I might need to stream video using the firewire. I went to
> look at some firewire cables on BestBuy and some of them are actually
> "slower" than some of the USB cables. So what's going on here? Im
> wondering if my USB 2.0 driver is on. I think I have it turned off in the
> BIOS because my computer kept freezing. I'll look into this. Thanks for
> any other tips/comments.

It's a question of camera design, not theoretical specs.  Camcorders are
designed to do full-resolution data streaming through 1394.  USB is intended
only for still transfer, webcam use, etc.

Don't waste your time trying to get good transfers with USB -- it's not
going to happen.  Buy a 1394 cable.  Don't get suckered in to buying
anything expensive -- the cheapest cable with the right connectors will work
just fine.


Show quoteHide quote
>
>
Author
24 Apr 2005 12:15 AM
TonyP
PTRAVEL wrote:

> It's a question of camera design, not theoretical specs.  Camcorders are
> designed to do full-resolution data streaming through 1394.  USB is intended
> only for still transfer, webcam use, etc.
>
> Don't waste your time trying to get good transfers with USB -- it's not
> going to happen.  Buy a 1394 cable.  Don't get suckered in to buying
> anything expensive -- the cheapest cable with the right connectors will work
> just fine.

While I basically agree with your statement concerning USB, it isn't
necessarily true.
Pinnacle Liquid Edition Pro attaches the breakout box to USB2.0.
Liquid Edition PRO breakout box (Component, Composite, S-Video, IEEE
1394 and Analog RCA S/PDIF).

You can capture and edit HDV just fine as long as you have a computer
system with the horsepower to handle it.
Author
24 Apr 2005 4:30 AM
PTRAVEL
Show quote Hide quote
"TonyP" <arpie***@Hooptonline.net> wrote in message
news:eyBae.16850$ZQ1.11810@fe11.lga...
> PTRAVEL wrote:
>
>> It's a question of camera design, not theoretical specs.  Camcorders are
>> designed to do full-resolution data streaming through 1394.  USB is
>> intended only for still transfer, webcam use, etc.
>>
>> Don't waste your time trying to get good transfers with USB -- it's not
>> going to happen.  Buy a 1394 cable.  Don't get suckered in to buying
>> anything expensive -- the cheapest cable with the right connectors will
>> work just fine.
>
> While I basically agree with your statement concerning USB, it isn't
> necessarily true.
> Pinnacle Liquid Edition Pro attaches the breakout box to USB2.0.
> Liquid Edition PRO breakout box (Component, Composite, S-Video, IEEE 1394
> and Analog RCA S/PDIF).
>
> You can capture and edit HDV just fine as long as you have a computer
> system with the horsepower to handle it.

Some times I think I'm writing in a language other than English. ;)

From my post:

"Camcorders are designed to do full-resolution data streaming through 1394.
USB is intended only for still transfer, webcam use, etc."

It's camcorder design, not the USB spec, that's the problem.  I have
external hard drives that I use for video edit and capture that are USB2,
and they work great.  However, the camera manufacturers decided on a
standard (and this was well before USB2 was around).  The standard is
1394/Firewire  -- if you want to capture full-resolution DV25 from a
camcorder, that's what you have to use.


Show quoteHide quote
>
Author
24 Apr 2005 6:01 PM
Dave Martindale
"PTRAVEL" <ptra***@ruyitang.com> writes:

>"Camcorders are designed to do full-resolution data streaming through 1394.
>USB is intended only for still transfer, webcam use, etc."

>It's camcorder design, not the USB spec, that's the problem.  I have
>external hard drives that I use for video edit and capture that are USB2,
>and they work great.  However, the camera manufacturers decided on a
>standard (and this was well before USB2 was around).  The standard is
>1394/Firewire  -- if you want to capture full-resolution DV25 from a
>camcorder, that's what you have to use.

Unless you have a camcorder that will stream DV25 video through USB2 as
well as Firewire.  Canon specifically mentions that capability for some
of their current models.

    Dave
Author
27 Apr 2005 12:19 AM
TonyP
PTRAVEL wrote:

Show quoteHide quote
> "TonyP" <arpie***@Hooptonline.net> wrote in message
> news:eyBae.16850$ZQ1.11810@fe11.lga...
>
>>PTRAVEL wrote:

>>>It's a question of camera design, not theoretical specs.  Camcorders are
>>>designed to do full-resolution data streaming through 1394.  USB is
>>>intended only for still transfer, webcam use, etc.
>>>
>>>Don't waste your time trying to get good transfers with USB -- it's not
>>>going to happen.  Buy a 1394 cable.  Don't get suckered in to buying
>>>anything expensive -- the cheapest cable with the right connectors will
>>>work just fine.
>>
>>While I basically agree with your statement concerning USB, it isn't
>>necessarily true.
>>Pinnacle Liquid Edition Pro attaches the breakout box to USB2.0.
>>Liquid Edition PRO breakout box (Component, Composite, S-Video, IEEE 1394
>>and Analog RCA S/PDIF).
>>
>>You can capture and edit HDV just fine as long as you have a computer
>>system with the horsepower to handle it.

> Some times I think I'm writing in a language other than English. ;)
>
> From my post:
>
> "Camcorders are designed to do full-resolution data streaming through 1394.
> USB is intended only for still transfer, webcam use, etc."
>
> It's camcorder design, not the USB spec, that's the problem.  I have
> external hard drives that I use for video edit and capture that are USB2,
> and they work great.  However, the camera manufacturers decided on a
> standard (and this was well before USB2 was around).  The standard is
> 1394/Firewire  -- if you want to capture full-resolution DV25 from a
> camcorder, that's what you have to use.

Understood. Sometimes my comprehension isn't up to speed. I would think
that the specs of the video camera would tell if it is capable of
streaming video. I would opt for firewire and be on the safe side.
Author
24 Apr 2005 9:22 PM
uriah@nospam.net
The 400 and 480 are transient peak values and do not correlate with
suwstained throughput.  Usb2 is adequate for current data rates, but
is (in a proper design) about 30 % slower in sustained throughput than
firewire.  full hdtv is about 19 megs a second.  Usb2 usually tops out
at about 25 for sustained throughput.

Stan


Show quoteHide quote
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:57:21 GMT, "Bradley" <bnor***@kc.rr.com> wrote:

>Okay, It seems my USB cable is too slow to transfer full quality video from
>camcorder to harddrive without getting sound lag in the video so I have been
>told I might need to stream video using the firewire. I went to look at some
>firewire cables on BestBuy and some of them are actually "slower" than some
>of the USB cables. So what's going on here? Im wondering if my USB 2.0
>driver is on. I think I have it turned off in the BIOS because my computer
>kept freezing. I'll look into this. Thanks for any other tips/comments.
>
Author
25 Apr 2005 8:37 AM
Dave Martindale
"uriah@nospam.net" <uriah> writes:
>The 400 and 480 are transient peak values and do not correlate with
>suwstained throughput.  Usb2 is adequate for current data rates, but
>is (in a proper design) about 30 % slower in sustained throughput than
>firewire.  full hdtv is about 19 megs a second.  Usb2 usually tops out
>at about 25 for sustained throughput.

Where does that figure for HDTV come from?

Broadcast HDTV is compressed to about 18 Mbits/sec, which is actually a
lower data rate than DV video at about 25 Mbits/sec.  Either of these
are well within the capacity of both Firewire and USB2 high speed.

But uncompressed HDTV is around 1500 Mbits/sec (SDI interface), far
beyond both Firewire and USB2.

On the other hand, the "25" number above probably refers to 25
Mbytes/sec disk I/O, which is 200 Mbits/sec.  Gotta keep the bits and
bytes straight to sensibly compare the numbers.

    Dave