|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
UT2004 crashes Gigabyte X800XT with with dynamic lights
dynamic-light-generating objects around. Whenever it crashes, the screen cycles a while between grey and blue, then turns to black and returns to BIOS POST. There's no BSOD, just plain blue. Whatever sounds were playing before the crash continue looping until the the computer is back on BIOS POST. The crash occurs whenever there's a few dozen light generating objects around. The sure way to reproduce the problem is to go to Instant Action, select any map and add the super berserk mutator. Once in game, a single volley of Link Gun primary fire (or Hellbender's Shock Core primary fire, or any other light-generating projectile) is enough to cause the crash. Normal play is possible with dynamic lights, as long as I don't wander into highly active areas. If I turn dynamic lights off, the game works fine. Dynamic lights work fine in software mode, too. The problem does not occur with other games (like Doom 3 or World of Warcraft), nor is the computer unstable while not gaming. Without dynamic lights, even UT2004 is very stable for long periods of time (10+ hours on CTF-FaceClassic with 32 bots). Prime95 on stress test mode didn't reveal any errors, nor did AtiTool's artifact scanning. I've tried underclocking the X800 to 300MHz (both GPU and memory), but that didn't help. Due to the water cooling, I doubt that the CPU or the GPU is overheating. If I leave the computer off overnight, start it up and directly go to UT2004 while temperatures are still at ~25C, the crash happens anyway. Normal CPU temperature is at 40C (I run distributed.net all the time), and GPU is roughly the same (because the same water cools both the CPU and the GPU). Case temperature is 20C-30C, depending on ambient temperature. Idle CPU temperature is usually 1-5C above ambient temperature (which is normally 23C). CPU and GPU temperature on full load (for example, 3DMark 05 or Prime95 & AtiTool's burn-in test) can rise to 55C, but drops quickly to normal when the computer becomes idle. The hard drives are usually at 40C. The only thing worrying me about the cooling is the ambient GPU temperature. Zalman's GPU waterblock doesn't cool the memory chips on X800 at all. Instead, Zalman ships 8 heatsinks for the video ram. Thus, the GPU environment temperature is 5-9 degrees higher than GPU core temperature on full load. Still, I don't think that the video RAM is overheating. UT2004 settings: 1600x1200 32bit, all details at max. Lowering detail settings while keeping dynamic lights on didn't help at all. Rig: Win2000 SP4 with latest patches Athlon64 3500+ with Cool n' Quiet on automatic (makes no difference if switched to high performance mode) 2x 512MB DDR2 (identical chips, using DualChannel) Abit A8V Deluxe AOpen H600 case Gigabyte x800 XT AGP Enermax EG475AX-VE(G)-SFMA 470W (is this enough?) Western Digital Caviar SE 200GB SATA150 Maxtor 160GB IDE Maxtor 80GB IDE Samsung DVD-R Soundblaster Audigy 2 bulk 100mbit NIC (the 1000mbit port on A8V is disabled) A8V's 802.11g PCI card (not in use) Cooling: Zalman Reserator 1 (using distilled water, bought it 7 months ago, haven't touched it since, the reservoir is 4/5 filled with water) Zalman ZM-GWB1 (ditto) -- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> Mika Hirvonen wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > My fully patched UT2004 crashes whenever there's too many Have you tried logging the power supply voltages while reproducing the > dynamic-light-generating objects around. Whenever it crashes, the screen > cycles a while between grey and blue, then turns to black and returns to > BIOS POST. There's no BSOD, just plain blue. Whatever sounds were > playing before the crash continue looping until the the computer is back > on BIOS POST. > > The crash occurs whenever there's a few dozen light generating objects > around. The sure way to reproduce the problem is to go to Instant > Action, select any map and add the super berserk mutator. Once in game, > a single volley of Link Gun primary fire (or Hellbender's Shock Core > primary fire, or any other light-generating projectile) is enough to > cause the crash. Normal play is possible with dynamic lights, as long as > I don't wander into highly active areas. > > If I turn dynamic lights off, the game works fine. Dynamic lights work > fine in software mode, too. The problem does not occur with other games > (like Doom 3 or World of Warcraft), nor is the computer unstable while > not gaming. Without dynamic lights, even UT2004 is very stable for long > periods of time (10+ hours on CTF-FaceClassic with 32 bots). > error? Maybe the power supply itself gets too hot and can not provide stable voltages under the high load. Show quoteHide quote > Prime95 on stress test mode didn't reveal any errors, nor did AtiTool's > artifact scanning. I've tried underclocking the X800 to 300MHz (both GPU > and memory), but that didn't help. > > Due to the water cooling, I doubt that the CPU or the GPU is > overheating. If I leave the computer off overnight, start it up and > directly go to UT2004 while temperatures are still at ~25C, the crash > happens anyway. Normal CPU temperature is at 40C (I run distributed.net > all the time), and GPU is roughly the same (because the same water cools > both the CPU and the GPU). Case temperature is 20C-30C, depending on > ambient temperature. Idle CPU temperature is usually 1-5C above ambient > temperature (which is normally 23C). CPU and GPU temperature on full > load (for example, 3DMark 05 or Prime95 & AtiTool's burn-in test) can > rise to 55C, but drops quickly to normal when the computer becomes idle. > The hard drives are usually at 40C. > > The only thing worrying me about the cooling is the ambient GPU > temperature. Zalman's GPU waterblock doesn't cool the memory chips on > X800 at all. Instead, Zalman ships 8 heatsinks for the video ram. Thus, > the GPU environment temperature is 5-9 degrees higher than GPU core > temperature on full load. Still, I don't think that the video RAM is > overheating. > > UT2004 settings: 1600x1200 32bit, all details at max. Lowering detail > settings while keeping dynamic lights on didn't help at all. > > Rig: > Win2000 SP4 with latest patches > Athlon64 3500+ with Cool n' Quiet on automatic (makes no difference if > switched to high performance mode) > 2x 512MB DDR2 (identical chips, using DualChannel) > Abit A8V Deluxe > AOpen H600 case > Gigabyte x800 XT AGP > Enermax EG475AX-VE(G)-SFMA 470W (is this enough?) > Western Digital Caviar SE 200GB SATA150 > Maxtor 160GB IDE > Maxtor 80GB IDE > Samsung DVD-R > Soundblaster Audigy 2 > bulk 100mbit NIC (the 1000mbit port on A8V is disabled) > A8V's 802.11g PCI card (not in use) > > Cooling: > Zalman Reserator 1 (using distilled water, bought it 7 months ago, > haven't touched it since, the reservoir is 4/5 filled with water) > Zalman ZM-GWB1 (ditto) > > -- > Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> Michael W. Ryder kirjoitti:
> Have you tried logging the power supply voltages while reproducing the Not according to Motherboard Monitor. Of course, because MBM logs > error? Maybe the power supply itself gets too hot and can not provide > stable voltages under the high load. temperatures and voltages once per second, it might not have any time to log the voltage if it goes down. -- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> Michael W. Ryder kirjoitti:
> Have you tried logging the power supply voltages while reproducing the Not according to Motherboard Monitor. Of course, because MBM logs > error? Maybe the power supply itself gets too hot and can not provide > stable voltages under the high load. temperatures and voltages once per second, it might not have any time to log the voltage if it goes down. -- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> If you've already ruled out other hardware components and the driver version
as potential culprits, then I'd assume that there is some defective silicon on the VPU, that is only being stressed in such a way as to make the system unstable, during lighting intensive operations - like what you've described in UT2004. If the card's still under warranty then get it RMA'd. If it still doesn't work then at least you've ruled out the x800. Show quoteHide quote "Mika Hirvonen" <hir***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:d1rhp7$nbk$1@nyytiset.pp.htv.fi... > My fully patched UT2004 crashes whenever there's too many > dynamic-light-generating objects around. Whenever it crashes, the screen > cycles a while between grey and blue, then turns to black and returns to > BIOS POST. There's no BSOD, just plain blue. Whatever sounds were playing > before the crash continue looping until the the computer is back on BIOS > POST. > > The crash occurs whenever there's a few dozen light generating objects > around. The sure way to reproduce the problem is to go to Instant Action, > select any map and add the super berserk mutator. Once in game, a single > volley of Link Gun primary fire (or Hellbender's Shock Core primary fire, > or any other light-generating projectile) is enough to cause the crash. > Normal play is possible with dynamic lights, as long as I don't wander > into highly active areas. > > If I turn dynamic lights off, the game works fine. Dynamic lights work > fine in software mode, too. The problem does not occur with other games > (like Doom 3 or World of Warcraft), nor is the computer unstable while not > gaming. Without dynamic lights, even UT2004 is very stable for long > periods of time (10+ hours on CTF-FaceClassic with 32 bots). > > Prime95 on stress test mode didn't reveal any errors, nor did AtiTool's > artifact scanning. I've tried underclocking the X800 to 300MHz (both GPU > and memory), but that didn't help. > > Due to the water cooling, I doubt that the CPU or the GPU is overheating. > If I leave the computer off overnight, start it up and directly go to > UT2004 while temperatures are still at ~25C, the crash happens anyway. > Normal CPU temperature is at 40C (I run distributed.net all the time), and > GPU is roughly the same (because the same water cools both the CPU and the > GPU). Case temperature is 20C-30C, depending on ambient temperature. Idle > CPU temperature is usually 1-5C above ambient temperature (which is > normally 23C). CPU and GPU temperature on full load (for example, 3DMark > 05 or Prime95 & AtiTool's burn-in test) can rise to 55C, but drops quickly > to normal when the computer becomes idle. The hard drives are usually at > 40C. > > The only thing worrying me about the cooling is the ambient GPU > temperature. Zalman's GPU waterblock doesn't cool the memory chips on X800 > at all. Instead, Zalman ships 8 heatsinks for the video ram. Thus, the GPU > environment temperature is 5-9 degrees higher than GPU core temperature on > full load. Still, I don't think that the video RAM is overheating. > > UT2004 settings: 1600x1200 32bit, all details at max. Lowering detail > settings while keeping dynamic lights on didn't help at all. > > Rig: > Win2000 SP4 with latest patches > Athlon64 3500+ with Cool n' Quiet on automatic (makes no difference if > switched to high performance mode) > 2x 512MB DDR2 (identical chips, using DualChannel) > Abit A8V Deluxe > AOpen H600 case > Gigabyte x800 XT AGP > Enermax EG475AX-VE(G)-SFMA 470W (is this enough?) > Western Digital Caviar SE 200GB SATA150 > Maxtor 160GB IDE > Maxtor 80GB IDE > Samsung DVD-R > Soundblaster Audigy 2 > bulk 100mbit NIC (the 1000mbit port on A8V is disabled) > A8V's 802.11g PCI card (not in use) > > Cooling: > Zalman Reserator 1 (using distilled water, bought it 7 months ago, haven't > touched it since, the reservoir is 4/5 filled with water) > Zalman ZM-GWB1 (ditto) > > -- > Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> Tony DiMarzio kirjoitti:
> If you've already ruled out other hardware components and the driver version I have done some tests, but I haven't tried the X800 on other computers. > as potential culprits, then I'd assume that there is some defective silicon The water cooling is cumbersome to remove, so I'd rather not do that unless I have to. I have downloaded different drivers, but I haven't had time to test them yet. Also, I have Fedora Core 3 and WinXP 64-bit RC1 lying around, so I'll test UT2004 with them, too. > on the VPU, that is only being stressed in such a way as to make the system That does sound plausible, but I've yet to find a way to reproduce the > unstable, during lighting intensive operations - like what you've described > in UT2004. problem in other games than UT2004, so I can't be sure. > If the card's still under warranty then get it RMA'd. If it still doesn't I think that the warranty expired the moment I removed the stock cooling > work then at least you've ruled out the x800. and replaced it with Zalman's GPU waterblock. :( -- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> Tony DiMarzio kirjoitti:
> If you've already ruled out other hardware components and the driver version I have done some tests, but I haven't tried the X800 on other computers. > as potential culprits, then I'd assume that there is some defective silicon The water cooling is cumbersome to remove, so I'd rather not do that unless I have to. I have downloaded different drivers, but I haven't had time to test them yet. Also, I have Fedora Core 3 and WinXP 64-bit RC1 lying around, so I'll test UT2004 with them, too. > on the VPU, that is only being stressed in such a way as to make the system That does sound plausible, but I've yet to find a way to reproduce the > unstable, during lighting intensive operations - like what you've described > in UT2004. problem in other games than UT2004, so I can't be sure. > If the card's still under warranty then get it RMA'd. If it still doesn't I think that the warranty expired the moment I removed the stock cooling > work then at least you've ruled out the x800. and replaced it with Zalman's GPU waterblock. :( -- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:52:08 +0200, Mika Hirvonen
<hir***@gmail.com> wrote: >My fully patched UT2004 crashes whenever there's too many What operating system?>dynamic-light-generating objects around. Whenever it crashes, the screen >cycles a while between grey and blue, then turns to black and returns to > BIOS POST. There's no BSOD, just plain blue. Whatever sounds were >playing before the crash continue looping until the the computer is back >on BIOS POST. If Win2k or XP, disable the reboot-on-error setting (Startup & Recovery, "automatically reboot"), if you hadn't already. Seems potentially a driver problem... and ATI, well, my primary gripe with them has always been the drivers/software side of the products. Show quoteHide quote >The crash occurs whenever there's a few dozen light generating objects You might try monitoring power supply voltages, take some>around. The sure way to reproduce the problem is to go to Instant >Action, select any map and add the super berserk mutator. Once in game, >a single volley of Link Gun primary fire (or Hellbender's Shock Core >primary fire, or any other light-generating projectile) is enough to >cause the crash. Normal play is possible with dynamic lights, as long as > I don't wander into highly active areas. > >If I turn dynamic lights off, the game works fine. Dynamic lights work >fine in software mode, too. The problem does not occur with other games >(like Doom 3 or World of Warcraft), nor is the computer unstable while >not gaming. Without dynamic lights, even UT2004 is very stable for long >periods of time (10+ hours on CTF-FaceClassic with 32 bots). > >Prime95 on stress test mode didn't reveal any errors, nor did AtiTool's >artifact scanning. I've tried underclocking the X800 to 300MHz (both GPU >and memory), but that didn't help. baseline readings then compare to fully loaded gaming with the problematic scenario recreated. > Well yes and no, it's more likely to have heat problems when>Due to the water cooling, I doubt that the CPU or the GPU is >overheating. water cooling because most people start thinking they can do away with fans... which they can't necessarily, there is more than the CPU or GPU that produce heat and while the other heat producing parts don't create nearly as much heat, it's heat meant to be removed by the passive flow past these parts by an active cooling (fans) nearby. It could be that your card is ruined already due to capacitors running too hot. Then again it might not be, isn't certain to happen in all nor even many if not most cases, this is only a possible scenario and only you can monitor your part's temps. >If I leave the computer off overnight, start it up and Then you may indeed have cool enough parts, unless this case>directly go to UT2004 while temperatures are still at ~25C, the crash >happens anyway. Normal CPU temperature is at 40C (I run distributed.net >all the time), and GPU is roughly the same (because the same water cools >both the CPU and the GPU). Case temperature is 20C-30C, depending on >ambient temperature. temp is inaccurate. >Idle CPU temperature is usually 1-5C above ambient If the heatsinks are making good contact with the chips, and>temperature (which is normally 23C). CPU and GPU temperature on full >load (for example, 3DMark 05 or Prime95 & AtiTool's burn-in test) can >rise to 55C, but drops quickly to normal when the computer becomes idle. >The hard drives are usually at 40C. > >The only thing worrying me about the cooling is the ambient GPU >temperature. Zalman's GPU waterblock doesn't cool the memory chips on >X800 at all. Instead, Zalman ships 8 heatsinks for the video ram. Thus, >the GPU environment temperature is 5-9 degrees higher than GPU core >temperature on full load. Still, I don't think that the video RAM is >overheating. you touch-test them and they dont' feel overly hot, they're not (overly hot). Touch-tests are not as accurate as thermal sensors but on the other hand the accuracy is good enought to determine ranges that are ok or bear further scrutiny. > If it were some other name-brand I'd say yes... as Enermax>UT2004 settings: 1600x1200 32bit, all details at max. Lowering detail >settings while keeping dynamic lights on didn't help at all. > >Rig: >Win2000 SP4 with latest patches >Athlon64 3500+ with Cool n' Quiet on automatic (makes no difference if >switched to high performance mode) >2x 512MB DDR2 (identical chips, using DualChannel) >Abit A8V Deluxe >AOpen H600 case >Gigabyte x800 XT AGP >Enermax EG475AX-VE(G)-SFMA 470W (is this enough?) rates for peak output rather than sustained, I'd question it even though it's probably sufficient. >Western Digital Caviar SE 200GB SATA150 I think your temp readings are off, most of the online>Maxtor 160GB IDE >Maxtor 80GB IDE >Samsung DVD-R >Soundblaster Audigy 2 >bulk 100mbit NIC (the 1000mbit port on A8V is disabled) >A8V's 802.11g PCI card (not in use) > >Cooling: >Zalman Reserator 1 (using distilled water, bought it 7 months ago, >haven't touched it since, the reservoir is 4/5 filled with water) >Zalman ZM-GWB1 (ditto) reviews show a Reserator doing little if any better than a regular fan & 'sink, if even that good when it comes to higher-performance (heat producing) parts. Regardless, that doesn't mean they're necessarily overheating. I'd try the different driver, try the card in another system, then proceed from there. "kony" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message Most people never have problems with their ATI cards drivers or news:5kf341ph595iucn54p62nm62pshtinduhc@4ax.com... > Seems potentially a driver problem... and ATI, well, my > primary gripe with them has always been the drivers/software > side of the products. software........ D'Oh! Couldn't resist! Kidding... the rest of the post was excellent advice as usual and something I'll keep in mind if any similar problems crop up.. just out of curiosity, do you do hardware troubleshooting for a living? On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:30:22 GMT, "Morituri-|-Max"
<new***@sendarico.net> wrote: Show quoteHide quote > I don't even have a computer!>"kony" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message >news:5kf341ph595iucn54p62nm62pshtinduhc@4ax.com... > >> Seems potentially a driver problem... and ATI, well, my >> primary gripe with them has always been the drivers/software >> side of the products. > >Most people never have problems with their ATI cards drivers or >software........ > >D'Oh! Couldn't resist! >Kidding... the rest of the post was excellent advice as usual and something >I'll keep in mind if any similar problems crop up.. just out of curiosity, >do you do hardware troubleshooting for a living? > > .... but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express once. :-P Nevermind me, I always go wacko in the Spring.kony kirjoitti:
Show quoteHide quote > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:52:08 +0200, Mika Hirvonen I did disable reboot-on-error, but I still don't see a BSOD. The screen > <hir***@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>My fully patched UT2004 crashes whenever there's too many >>dynamic-light-generating objects around. Whenever it crashes, the screen >>cycles a while between grey and blue, then turns to black and returns to >> BIOS POST. There's no BSOD, just plain blue. Whatever sounds were >>playing before the crash continue looping until the the computer is back >>on BIOS POST. > > > What operating system? > If Win2k or XP, disable the reboot-on-error setting (Startup > & Recovery, "automatically reboot"), if you hadn't already. just stays blue. Event viewer does report a crash, but does not specify any human-readable reason for it. I'll post the full error message when I get home. > Seems potentially a driver problem... and ATI, well, my I do have both Fedora Core 3 and WinXP 64-bit RC1 on the other drives, > primary gripe with them has always been the drivers/software > side of the products. I'll try UT2004 with them today. Also, I've downloaded different versions of Catalyst drivers, but haven't had any time to test them yet. > You might try monitoring power supply voltages, take some I already did, but due to the fact that MBM can log voltages at most > baseline readings then compare to fully loaded gaming with > the problematic scenario recreated. once per second, it probably can't catch a sudden voltage drop. >>Due to the water cooling, I doubt that the CPU or the GPU is The case is a bit crowded near the outer edge of the X800 (water tubes, >>overheating. > Well yes and no, it's more likely to have heat problems when > water cooling because most people start thinking they can do > away with fans... which they can't necessarily, there is > more than the CPU or GPU that produce heat and while the > other heat producing parts don't create nearly as much heat, > it's heat meant to be removed by the passive flow past these > parts by an active cooling (fans) nearby. It could be that IDE cables, power cables), but none of the parts feel hot. > your card is ruined already due to capacitors running too Is there any way to see whether the capacitors are damaged?> hot. Then again it might not be, isn't certain to happen in It's from memory, I'm not on my computer right now.> all nor even many if not most cases, this is only a possible > scenario and only you can monitor your part's temps. >>If I leave the computer off overnight, start it up and >>directly go to UT2004 while temperatures are still at ~25C, the crash >>happens anyway. Normal CPU temperature is at 40C (I run distributed.net >>all the time), and GPU is roughly the same (because the same water cools >>both the CPU and the GPU). Case temperature is 20C-30C, depending on >>ambient temperature. > Then you may indeed have cool enough parts, unless this case > temp is inaccurate. Show quoteHide quote >>Idle CPU temperature is usually 1-5C above ambient They are at a bit higher temperature than normal body temp, but they >>temperature (which is normally 23C). CPU and GPU temperature on full >>load (for example, 3DMark 05 or Prime95 & AtiTool's burn-in test) can >>rise to 55C, but drops quickly to normal when the computer becomes idle. >>The hard drives are usually at 40C. >> >>The only thing worrying me about the cooling is the ambient GPU >>temperature. Zalman's GPU waterblock doesn't cool the memory chips on >>X800 at all. Instead, Zalman ships 8 heatsinks for the video ram. Thus, >>the GPU environment temperature is 5-9 degrees higher than GPU core >>temperature on full load. Still, I don't think that the video RAM is >>overheating. > > > If the heatsinks are making good contact with the chips, and > you touch-test them and they dont' feel overly hot, they're > not (overly hot). Touch-tests are not as accurate as don't feel hot. The heatsinks don't seem loose from the chips, and don't move when pushed towards the them. Show quoteHide quote >>UT2004 settings: 1600x1200 32bit, all details at max. Lowering detail Yes, if the computer is working at full burn and I keep the windows >>settings while keeping dynamic lights on didn't help at all. >> >>Rig: >>Win2000 SP4 with latest patches >>Athlon64 3500+ with Cool n' Quiet on automatic (makes no difference if >>switched to high performance mode) >>2x 512MB DDR2 (identical chips, using DualChannel) >>Abit A8V Deluxe >>AOpen H600 case >>Gigabyte x800 XT AGP >>Enermax EG475AX-VE(G)-SFMA 470W (is this enough?) > > > If it were some other name-brand I'd say yes... as Enermax > rates for peak output rather than sustained, I'd question it > even though it's probably sufficient. >>Western Digital Caviar SE 200GB SATA150 >>Maxtor 160GB IDE >>Maxtor 80GB IDE >>Samsung DVD-R >>Soundblaster Audigy 2 >>bulk 100mbit NIC (the 1000mbit port on A8V is disabled) >>A8V's 802.11g PCI card (not in use) >> >>Cooling: >>Zalman Reserator 1 (using distilled water, bought it 7 months ago, >>haven't touched it since, the reservoir is 4/5 filled with water) >>Zalman ZM-GWB1 (ditto) > > > I think your temp readings are off, most of the online > reviews show a Reserator doing little if any better than a > regular fan & 'sink, if even that good when it comes to closed, the temperatures don't differ that much from the temperatures I got with stock cooling. The Reserator does keep the case temperature low and cools the CPU and the GPU quicker than air cooling, though. I keep my Reserator near an open window, so it probably gets rid of excess heat quicker than usual. > higher-performance (heat producing) parts. Regardless, that I'd rather not remove the X800 unless I'm sure that it's faulty, because > doesn't mean they're necessarily overheating. I'd try the > different driver, try the card in another system, then > proceed from there. draining the system and removing the water cooling takes a while. -- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:34:40 +0200, Mika Hirvonen
<hir***@gmail.com> wrote: >> You might try monitoring power supply voltages, take some No, I mean, YOU take readings.>> baseline readings then compare to fully loaded gaming with >> the problematic scenario recreated. > >I already did, but due to the fact that MBM can log voltages at most >once per second, it probably can't catch a sudden voltage drop. Digital multimeter I never suggest software readings except for a curious novelty. You don't have to catch a sudden drop, rather noting the difference in load causing the voltage to drop. Before it gets below that threshold, if there is one it's reaching, it's be the same trend up until that moment. Show quoteHide quote > Usually they'd look it, domed vented tops, residue on top or>>>Due to the water cooling, I doubt that the CPU or the GPU is >>>overheating. >> Well yes and no, it's more likely to have heat problems when >> water cooling because most people start thinking they can do >> away with fans... which they can't necessarily, there is >> more than the CPU or GPU that produce heat and while the >> other heat producing parts don't create nearly as much heat, >> it's heat meant to be removed by the passive flow past these >> parts by an active cooling (fans) nearby. It could be that > >The case is a bit crowded near the outer edge of the X800 (water tubes, >IDE cables, power cables), but none of the parts feel hot. > >> your card is ruined already due to capacitors running too > >Is there any way to see whether the capacitors are damaged? bottom. Discoloration around the voltage regulation circuits is also a strong sign of it. > Well... it is the surest way to isolate the card from rest>I'd rather not remove the X800 unless I'm sure that it's faulty, because >draining the system and removing the water cooling takes a while. of system... kony kirjoitti:
Show quoteHide quote > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:52:08 +0200, Mika Hirvonen I did disable reboot-on-error, but I still don't see a BSOD. The screen > <hir***@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>My fully patched UT2004 crashes whenever there's too many >>dynamic-light-generating objects around. Whenever it crashes, the screen >>cycles a while between grey and blue, then turns to black and returns to >> BIOS POST. There's no BSOD, just plain blue. Whatever sounds were >>playing before the crash continue looping until the the computer is back >>on BIOS POST. > > > What operating system? > If Win2k or XP, disable the reboot-on-error setting (Startup > & Recovery, "automatically reboot"), if you hadn't already. just stays blue. Event viewer does report a crash, but does not specify any human-readable reason for it. I'll post the full error message when I get home. > Seems potentially a driver problem... and ATI, well, my I do have both Fedora Core 3 and WinXP 64-bit RC1 on the other drives, > primary gripe with them has always been the drivers/software > side of the products. I'll try UT2004 with them today. Also, I've downloaded different versions of Catalyst drivers, but haven't had any time to test them yet. > You might try monitoring power supply voltages, take some I already did, but due to the fact that MBM can log voltages at most > baseline readings then compare to fully loaded gaming with > the problematic scenario recreated. once per second, it probably can't catch a sudden voltage drop. >>Due to the water cooling, I doubt that the CPU or the GPU is The case is a bit crowded near the outer edge of the X800 (water tubes, >>overheating. > Well yes and no, it's more likely to have heat problems when > water cooling because most people start thinking they can do > away with fans... which they can't necessarily, there is > more than the CPU or GPU that produce heat and while the > other heat producing parts don't create nearly as much heat, > it's heat meant to be removed by the passive flow past these > parts by an active cooling (fans) nearby. It could be that IDE cables, power cables), but none of the parts feel hot. > your card is ruined already due to capacitors running too Is there any way to see whether the capacitors are damaged?> hot. Then again it might not be, isn't certain to happen in It's from memory, I'm not on my computer right now.> all nor even many if not most cases, this is only a possible > scenario and only you can monitor your part's temps. >>If I leave the computer off overnight, start it up and >>directly go to UT2004 while temperatures are still at ~25C, the crash >>happens anyway. Normal CPU temperature is at 40C (I run distributed.net >>all the time), and GPU is roughly the same (because the same water cools >>both the CPU and the GPU). Case temperature is 20C-30C, depending on >>ambient temperature. > Then you may indeed have cool enough parts, unless this case > temp is inaccurate. Show quoteHide quote >>Idle CPU temperature is usually 1-5C above ambient They are at a bit higher temperature than normal body temp, but they >>temperature (which is normally 23C). CPU and GPU temperature on full >>load (for example, 3DMark 05 or Prime95 & AtiTool's burn-in test) can >>rise to 55C, but drops quickly to normal when the computer becomes idle. >>The hard drives are usually at 40C. >> >>The only thing worrying me about the cooling is the ambient GPU >>temperature. Zalman's GPU waterblock doesn't cool the memory chips on >>X800 at all. Instead, Zalman ships 8 heatsinks for the video ram. Thus, >>the GPU environment temperature is 5-9 degrees higher than GPU core >>temperature on full load. Still, I don't think that the video RAM is >>overheating. > > > If the heatsinks are making good contact with the chips, and > you touch-test them and they dont' feel overly hot, they're > not (overly hot). Touch-tests are not as accurate as don't feel hot. The heatsinks don't seem loose from the chips, and don't move when pushed towards the them. Show quoteHide quote >>UT2004 settings: 1600x1200 32bit, all details at max. Lowering detail Yes, if the computer is working at full burn and I keep the windows >>settings while keeping dynamic lights on didn't help at all. >> >>Rig: >>Win2000 SP4 with latest patches >>Athlon64 3500+ with Cool n' Quiet on automatic (makes no difference if >>switched to high performance mode) >>2x 512MB DDR2 (identical chips, using DualChannel) >>Abit A8V Deluxe >>AOpen H600 case >>Gigabyte x800 XT AGP >>Enermax EG475AX-VE(G)-SFMA 470W (is this enough?) > > > If it were some other name-brand I'd say yes... as Enermax > rates for peak output rather than sustained, I'd question it > even though it's probably sufficient. >>Western Digital Caviar SE 200GB SATA150 >>Maxtor 160GB IDE >>Maxtor 80GB IDE >>Samsung DVD-R >>Soundblaster Audigy 2 >>bulk 100mbit NIC (the 1000mbit port on A8V is disabled) >>A8V's 802.11g PCI card (not in use) >> >>Cooling: >>Zalman Reserator 1 (using distilled water, bought it 7 months ago, >>haven't touched it since, the reservoir is 4/5 filled with water) >>Zalman ZM-GWB1 (ditto) > > > I think your temp readings are off, most of the online > reviews show a Reserator doing little if any better than a > regular fan & 'sink, if even that good when it comes to closed, the temperatures don't differ that much from the temperatures I got with stock cooling. The Reserator does keep the case temperature low and cools the CPU and the GPU quicker than air cooling, though. I keep my Reserator near an open window, so it probably gets rid of excess heat quicker than usual. > higher-performance (heat producing) parts. Regardless, that I'd rather not remove the X800 unless I'm sure that it's faulty, because > doesn't mean they're necessarily overheating. I'd try the > different driver, try the card in another system, then > proceed from there. draining the system and removing the water cooling takes a while. -- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> Upgrading to Catalyst 5.3 solved the problem, thanks all.
-- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:34:40 +0200, Mika Hirvonen
<hir***@gmail.com> wrote: >> You might try monitoring power supply voltages, take some No, I mean, YOU take readings.>> baseline readings then compare to fully loaded gaming with >> the problematic scenario recreated. > >I already did, but due to the fact that MBM can log voltages at most >once per second, it probably can't catch a sudden voltage drop. Digital multimeter I never suggest software readings except for a curious novelty. You don't have to catch a sudden drop, rather noting the difference in load causing the voltage to drop. Before it gets below that threshold, if there is one it's reaching, it's be the same trend up until that moment. Show quoteHide quote > Usually they'd look it, domed vented tops, residue on top or>>>Due to the water cooling, I doubt that the CPU or the GPU is >>>overheating. >> Well yes and no, it's more likely to have heat problems when >> water cooling because most people start thinking they can do >> away with fans... which they can't necessarily, there is >> more than the CPU or GPU that produce heat and while the >> other heat producing parts don't create nearly as much heat, >> it's heat meant to be removed by the passive flow past these >> parts by an active cooling (fans) nearby. It could be that > >The case is a bit crowded near the outer edge of the X800 (water tubes, >IDE cables, power cables), but none of the parts feel hot. > >> your card is ruined already due to capacitors running too > >Is there any way to see whether the capacitors are damaged? bottom. Discoloration around the voltage regulation circuits is also a strong sign of it. > Well... it is the surest way to isolate the card from rest>I'd rather not remove the X800 unless I'm sure that it's faulty, because >draining the system and removing the water cooling takes a while. of system... you serious? lol.
you really should have tried the most recent driver in the first place. Show quoteHide quote "Mika Hirvonen" <hir***@welho.com> wrote in message news:d1uj0p$8v8$1@nyytiset.pp.htv.fi... > Upgrading to Catalyst 5.3 solved the problem, thanks all. > > -- > Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> Upgrading to Catalyst 5.3 solved the problem, thanks all.
-- Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> you serious? lol.
you really should have tried the most recent driver in the first place. Show quoteHide quote "Mika Hirvonen" <hir***@welho.com> wrote in message news:d1uj0p$8v8$1@nyytiset.pp.htv.fi... > Upgrading to Catalyst 5.3 solved the problem, thanks all. > > -- > Mika Hirvonen <hir***@gmail.com> Mika Hirvonen <hir***@welho.com> wrote:
> Upgrading to Catalyst 5.3 solved the problem, thanks all. With most gaming video card problems, you should try the latest or different drivers as the very first step to solving the problem. It's almost always a driver issue. Mika Hirvonen <hir***@welho.com> wrote:
> Upgrading to Catalyst 5.3 solved the problem, thanks all. With most gaming video card problems, you should try the latest or different drivers as the very first step to solving the problem. It's almost always a driver issue.
On this subject of refurbished bits...
Buffalo LPV2-USB Print Server - help required new network: best wireless options? Where can I get... can i run my server upside down?... AOpen XC Cube EZ65-II (sff) USB2? A 'Ghost-like' tool that backs up individual folders and files? boot failure MSI GeForce 6600GT just blew up! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||