|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
How to Undervolt a Fan Inside a Small Device?
small device in order to cut down the noise from the fan. If I understand this correctly, I am supposed to do this by undervolting the fan from 12-volt it is now to something like 6-volt using some kind of "inline resistor" or someting. I can soldering wires together. But I really don't know much about resistor and such. I am hoping someone can give me the "exact" information about the way to do this. The small device is a LinkSys gigabit switch that has a very noisy 40mm fan in it. I have replaced it with a slightly quieter Papst 60mm fan. My intention is to oversize the fan and then reduce the fan speed; then I will be able to maintain the same air flow as the 40mm fan but with less noise. Now, I have the oversized fan mounted inside the gigabit switch. And I can feel that its air flow is definitely stronger than the 40mm fan. This means I can go ahead to reduce its speed without worrying about the possibility of not getting enough air flow. I need to figure out how to reduce its speed. My questions are: - I am under the impression that I should use something called an "inline resistor". Is it the right product? - Because the gigabit switch has very limit space inside, the "inline resistor" must be small enough to fit inside. Will it be small enough? - The fan is rated as 12V and 0.6 watt with two wires. What type of "inline resistor" should I use? I am under the impression that inline resistor is rated by "ohms". Can someone give me a RadioShack product-number or something like that? - Which wire should I solder the inline resistor to the fan? Red-wire or the blue-wire of the fan? - Does this matter which way I orient the inline resistor? Thanks in advance for any information. Jay Chan jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > Well, at least you know you don't know anything about electricity. > I would like to know the way to reduce the speed of a fan inside a > small device in order to cut down the noise from the fan. If I > understand this correctly, I am supposed to do this by undervolting > the fan from 12-volt it is now to something like 6-volt using some > kind of "inline resistor" or someting. I can soldering wires > together. But I really don't know much about resistor and such. I > am hoping someone can give me the "exact" information about the > way to do this. > .... snip ... > > - The fan is rated as 12V and 0.6 watt with two wires. > What type of "inline resistor" should I use? I am > under the impression that inline resistor is rated > by "ohms". Can someone give me a RadioShack > product-number or something like that? > > - Which wire should I solder the inline resistor to the > fan? Red-wire or the blue-wire of the fan? > > - Does this matter which way I orient the inline resistor? If the figures you give are accurate (which they aren't, they are probably maximums) you want about the same ohmage as what the fan appears to be. This would be about 12 v. / 0.05 A = 240 ohms. All that really does is give you a ball park number. You may want anything from about 100 ohms to that. They should probably be at least 2 watt rated for safety, but have virtually no tolerance requirements. Get a set of 2 watt carbon resistors, worth about 5 to 10 cents each (but expect to pay more unless you can raid someones junk box), say 100, 150, 220, 330 ohms and try them out. No, it doesn't matter which lead they appear in, nor which direction they are connected in. Ohms and watts are an adequate specification, and you don't need anything better than 10 or 20% tolerance. To try them out you don't need to solder anything. Clip leads with alligator clips on the ends will be useful. Feel the resistor while running with it - it should not be too hot to touch. If so, it is a sign you need a higher wattage. But I expect 2 watts will be more than adequate. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson <snip>
Show quoteHide quote > Well, at least you know you don't know anything about electricity. Just wondering... When trying to slow a fan in a PC, which is better - using> If the figures you give are accurate (which they aren't, they are > probably maximums) you want about the same ohmage as what the fan > appears to be. This would be about 12 v. / 0.05 A = 240 ohms. All > that really does is give you a ball park number. You may want > anything from about 100 ohms to that. They should probably be at > least 2 watt rated for safety, but have virtually no tolerance > requirements. Get a set of 2 watt carbon resistors, worth about 5 > to 10 cents each (but expect to pay more unless you can raid > someones junk box), say 100, 150, 220, 330 ohms and try them out. > No, it doesn't matter which lead they appear in, nor which > direction they are connected in. Ohms and watts are an adequate > specification, and you don't need anything better than 10 or 20% > tolerance. 5v and 12v to get 7v to the fan, or adding a resistor inline? I've got a Media PC that's very quiet except for one case fan. Thx On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:15:30 GMT, "Noozer" <dont.spam@me.here> wrote: Troll>Just wondering... When trying to slow a fan in a PC, which is better - using >5v and 12v to get 7v to the fan, or adding a resistor inline? "pilgrim" <no.spam@my.house.pls> wrote in message Look who's talkingnews:kbpg3157hikurreppkl95qn769g4ahh6s0@4ax.com... > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:15:30 GMT, "Noozer" <dont.spam@me.here> wrote: > > >Just wondering... When trying to slow a fan in a PC, which is better - using > >5v and 12v to get 7v to the fan, or adding a resistor inline? > > Troll On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:15:30 GMT, "Noozer"
<dont.spam@me.here> wrote: > The resistor, assuming a reliable connection is made>Just wondering... When trying to slow a fan in a PC, which is better - using >5v and 12v to get 7v to the fan, or adding a resistor inline? (soldered or good crimp, not just twisted bare wires) and electrically isolated (like heatshrink or similar, as electrical tape can degrade and unravel especially in hotter environments). In practice, either has worked fine for most people trying (either). The resistor is certainly a higher level of control, being able to choose some other voltage... 7V is too slow for some applications and 5V too low for some fans to even reliably spin-up. With today's larger 92-120mm fans becoming more common, in some cases running the fan from 5V (5V rail & ground) could be a good alternative instead. > Only issue there is being aware of the resultant temp>I've got a Media PC that's very quiet except for one case fan. changes that come from flow reduction.
Show quote
Hide quote
"kony" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message Thanks. I felt that the resistor was better, but I wasn't sure if there wasnews:r9pg31h6i0rq04sb9t0upba9bebbj75p57@4ax.com... > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:15:30 GMT, "Noozer" > <dont.spam@me.here> wrote: > >Just wondering... When trying to slow a fan in a PC, which is better - using > >5v and 12v to get 7v to the fan, or adding a resistor inline? > > The resistor, assuming a reliable connection is made > (soldered or good crimp, not just twisted bare wires) and > electrically isolated (like heatshrink or similar, as > electrical tape can degrade and unravel especially in hotter > environments). anything about it that I had overlooked. > >I've got a Media PC that's very quiet except for one case fan. Machine runs cool. I'd just disconnect the fan completely, but I think that> > Only issue there is being aware of the resultant temp > changes that come from flow reduction. would be a bit drastic as the chassis isn't the best design. Noozer wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > You can only use the 12-5=7 trick when the 5 V line has enough load> <snip> > >> Well, at least you know you don't know anything about electricity. >> If the figures you give are accurate (which they aren't, they are >> probably maximums) you want about the same ohmage as what the fan >> appears to be. This would be about 12 v. / 0.05 A = 240 ohms. All >> that really does is give you a ball park number. You may want >> anything from about 100 ohms to that. They should probably be at >> least 2 watt rated for safety, but have virtually no tolerance >> requirements. Get a set of 2 watt carbon resistors, worth about >> 5 to 10 cents each (but expect to pay more unless you can raid >> someones junk box), say 100, 150, 220, 330 ohms and try them out. >> No, it doesn't matter which lead they appear in, nor which >> direction they are connected in. Ohms and watts are an adequate >> specification, and you don't need anything better than 10 or 20% >> tolerance. > > Just wondering... When trying to slow a fan in a PC, which is better > - using 5v and 12v to get 7v to the fan, or adding a resistor inline? > > I've got a Media PC that's very quiet except for one case fan. on it to sink the 7 V current. That will usually be so. However, that also gives you only one possible operation point, while the resistor allows you to select what you want, at the cost of a watt or two. Please try to get in the habit of preserving attributions for material you quote. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson Thanks for specifying the range of inline resistors that I can try.
This is especially useful if I need to mail order them. Then, I can order a range of inline resistors instead of just one type. Otherwise, the shipping cost will kill me if I need to order various types multiple times. Anyway, I will look for them in the local RadioShack first. If not, I may have to mail order them. Jay Chan On 15 Mar 2005 20:18:20 -0800, jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >I would like to know the way to reduce the speed of a fan inside a there should be also a +5 V somewhere inside the case available!>small device in order to cut down the noise from the fan. If I >understand this correctly, I am supposed to do this by undervolting the >fan from 12-volt ..... >The small device is a LinkSys gigabit switch that has a very noisy 40mm >fan in it. I have replaced it with a slightly quieter Papst 60mm fan. >My intention is to oversize the fan and then reduce the fan speed; then >I will be able to maintain the same air flow as the 40mm fan but with >less noise. Now, I have the oversized fan mounted inside the gigabit >switch. And I can feel that its air flow is definitely stronger than >the 40mm fan. This means I can go ahead to reduce its speed without >worrying about the possibility of not getting enough air flow. I need >to figure out how to reduce its speed. >My questions are: >- The fan is rated as 12V and 0.6 watt with two wires. >Thanks in advance for any information. Find it & tray that instead of 12V ... -- Show quoteHide quote˛˛ ˛˛ Regards , SPAJKY ® \\.//_. mail addr. @ my site @ http://www.spajky.vze.com \°/ ".. long live & prosper.." - 3rd Anniversary running it: || "Tualatin OC-ed / BX-Slot1 / inaudible setup!" I only see one single two-pins connection on the circuit board of that
small gigabit switch. This means this option is not available. Moreover, I believe 5-volt may be too low, and the fan "may" have a problem to start spinning according to what I read in other newsgroup about undervolting a fan to keep a PC quiet. Jay Chan jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
> Without quotes and attributions your messages make no sense. See> I only see one single two-pins connection on the circuit board of > that small gigabit switch. This means this option is not available. > > Moreover, I believe 5-volt may be too low, and the fan "may" have a > problem to start spinning according to what I read in other > newsgroup about undervolting a fan to keep a PC quiet. my sig below for a means of sane use of google. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson > Without quotes and attributions your messages make no sense. See How does it look now? Does it show up the right way?> my sig below for a means of sane use of google. > > -- > "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use > the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on > "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the > "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson Jay Chan jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
> *>> "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't>> Without quotes and attributions your messages make no sense. See >> my sig below for a means of sane use of google. *>> *>> -- use *>> the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on *>> "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the *>> "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson > *> Jay Chan> How does it look now? Does it show up the right way? *> That looks fine. Very good. Now you just need to learn to snip the useless portions that are not germane to the reply. In this case it would be all the lines preceded by * above. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson > That looks fine. Very good. Now you just need to learn to snip OK, I will reply through the Show-Options button from now on.> the useless portions that are not germane to the reply. In this > case it would be all the lines preceded by * above. I am still wondering what happened to my previous reply that doesn't show up. Jay Chan jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
> Usenet is a fundamentally unreliable system. An article is sent to.... snip ... > > I am still wondering what happened to my previous reply that doesn't > show up. some list of entities, which in turn send it on to other lists they know about. A glitch in transmisssion, or a mistake in a list, means the article stops promulgating. Google is just one of many entities receiving usenet articles, in something like 50,000 or more newsgroups. Once your article gets to one of those many servers, some user can come along and query the server about what it has available. These are usually classified by author, date, subject, newsgroup, and thread. There are standards defining these things generally known as RFCs. Your article may never get read, or it may only be read at a small fraction of the servers receiving it, or it may be exceedingly popular. Thus it is important to trim it down to the essentials, and to follow the established conventions. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson On 15 Mar 2005 20:18:20 -0800, jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
>I would like to know the way to reduce the speed of a fan inside a Take original fan and cut it's power + lead in half, maybe>small device in order to cut down the noise from the fan. If I >understand this correctly, I am supposed to do this by undervolting the >fan from 12-volt it is now to something like 6-volt using some kind of >"inline resistor" or someting. I can soldering wires together. But I >really don't know much about resistor and such. I am hoping someone can >give me the "exact" information about the way to do this. in the middle so you have enough slack to work with. Next look at the length of the resistor you'd use, accounting for a few (maybe 3) millimeters on each of the leads, and cut off that much more from one of the ends of the wire you'd just cut. Essentially you're shortening the lead such that both leads will be same length after the resistor is soldered on, which is theoretically unnecessary but looks better. Get a 2W resistor, the value depends on the fan but a ballpark range would be 47-200 Ohm. A value of about 100 Ohm is a good first guess with no further info. Since you don't yet know what the resultant RPM & noise will be at "6.0V", it could be that you don't actually want exactly 6V? Another alternative could be to start out with a 200 Ohm (or make-do with whatever is available) rheostat, dialing in the resistance value you find to be optimal then measuring the resistance, to "size" the resistor value you need. Then choose the closest commonly available value (or whatever you have on hand). So you've found the resistor value you want, simply slip a length of heat-shrink tubing on each of the cut wire ends, back as far as possible away from the heat of soldering. Then solder on the wires- could help to tin the wires first and/or clamp them to the resistor while soldering. In theor a mechanical joint is best before soldering, but a good solder joint alone with heatshrink over it is sufficient for a non-stressed connection (no later mechanical force will be applied to it). After resistor is soldered on, slip the heatshrink over the soldered, bare metal area and heat it up to shrink it. Show quoteHide quote > Inline simply means it's a serial connection, that you cut>The small device is a LinkSys gigabit switch that has a very noisy 40mm >fan in it. I have replaced it with a slightly quieter Papst 60mm fan. >My intention is to oversize the fan and then reduce the fan speed; then >I will be able to maintain the same air flow as the 40mm fan but with >less noise. Now, I have the oversized fan mounted inside the gigabit >switch. And I can feel that its air flow is definitely stronger than >the 40mm fan. This means I can go ahead to reduce its speed without >worrying about the possibility of not getting enough air flow. I need >to figure out how to reduce its speed. > >My questions are: > >- I am under the impression that I should use something > called an "inline resistor". Is it the right product? the power lead and put each cut end on opposite ends of the resistor. It would be called a "2W" resistor. There are different resistor compositions like metal or carbon and ceramic, etc. They don't matter, just use smallest 2W resistor you can find, OR the cheapest, or whatever's available where you normally purchase parts (to combine with other orders since resistor is tiny fraction of the cost to ship it) or whatever you have handy. > Yes, so long as you don't get a giant cermet (cement filled)>- Because the gigabit switch has very limit space > inside, the "inline resistor" must be small enough > to fit inside. Will it be small enough? wire-wound type. They are usually rectangular and white colored, and quite overkill. The typical resistor you might seek is about the diameter of a thin pencil and just under 2 cm long. > It's a relatively slow fan already, again I'd try around 100>- The fan is rated as 12V and 0.6 watt with two wires. Ohm resistor first, maybe slightly higher. > What type of "inline resistor" should I use? I am Well Radio Shack might have them, I'll check that in a> under the impression that inline resistor is rated > by "ohms". Can someone give me a RadioShack > product-number or something like that? moment but these are common parts, any fully stocked electronics outfit should have something suitable. Seems like Radio Shack brick-n-mortar stores carry fewer misc. parts than they used to, you might not be able to assume what's available online is actually stocked in any particular store- I'd call ahead first to ask as one store might have it but another not. I didn't see any on Radio Shack's website, maybe I overlooked them but I dug up another source, might as well get a good deal on 'em? http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G14511&variation=&aitem=2&mitem=11 You might call and ask them if they'd just throw 5 (pieces instead of 200) of them in an envelope, if you're trying to get ultra-cheap shipping. Since the fan has such a low RPM already, it's possible that it's not a good candidate for (around) 6V operation, but it might be suitably quiet at higher voltage. You might try a 68 Ohm resistor, or solder two 120 Ohm resistors in parallel (for 60 Ohms), which is just connecting both ends of each resistor together and one end of the cut wire (mentioned previously) to each junction. > Positive, usually red-wire is the typical way, but if you>- Which wire should I solder the inline resistor to the > fan? Red-wire or the blue-wire of the fan? wanted to solder it to the blue wire instead that would work too with no drawbacks since this is only a two (power) lead type fan connection. >- Does this matter which way I orient the inline resistor? noThanks for the detailed reply that you have spent the time to prepare.
I appreciate your help. I especially appreciate the fact that you have gone through the trouble to find a picture of the 120 ohm resistor. Now, I have an idea of what I should be looking for. Also thanks for telling me the details on the way to attach it to the wiring. I will buy a range of inline resistors plus the 68 ohm resistor that you have suggested, and several alligator clips. Jay Chan I use a Zalman Noiseless Resistor Cable from
http://www.quietpc.com/uk/casefansacc.php#rc56 and it has made my PC quiet. Mike Glad to hear that you have good result with using that Zalman resistor
cable. I came across the exact same item last night when I was looking around for a solution. But I was not exactly sure how I could use this 3-wires item into my 2-wires configuration. Moreover, I didn't know whether the resistor was the right item for my 60mm fan. Therefore, I figured I should ask first before spending the money. Now that I have received some helpful info here. I have a feeling that the Zalman resistor cable could work. I just needed to cut out the plugs and only used the resistor. But if I needed to cut out the plugs, I might as well order the resistor alone from elsewhere. Having said that I should add that that Zalman resistor cable should be useful for people who need to reduce the noise of a case fan without soldering. By the way, what's the ohm rating of that Zalman resistor cable, how many watt, and what size fan do you use the cable for? I am just curious. Jay Chan On 16 Mar 2005 09:53:19 -0800, jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
>Thanks for the detailed reply that you have spent the time to prepare. The optimal type would have that semi-barbell shape, but>I appreciate your help. > >I especially appreciate the fact that you have gone through the trouble >to find a picture of the 120 ohm resistor. Now, I have an idea of what >I should be looking for. usually are not cut (leads) and formed (bent leads) yet, which is no problem either way, the leads are quite easy to cut and bend. Often the resistors will not be solid green like the one I linked but colored based on type and striped to indicate the value. For example the Zalman resistor Mike linked wasn't a great picture but appears to be striped: Green, Blue, Black, Gold, which is a 56 Ohm 5% tolerance resistor. Don't worry about tolerance, this is not a precision application requiring any particular tolernace part. Generally speaking, the faster the fan is at default (12V), the lower the value of the resistor to use to reduce it's speed. This initially seems contrary to reason but is due to the lower resistance of the fan's windings & circuit. I expect 68 ohms to not be a large enough value but I do not have any of that particular model of fan to experiment with. > The heatshrink tubing is very handy too, maybe 3/32 (+->Also thanks for telling me the details on the way to attach it to the >wiring. > >I will buy a range of inline resistors plus the 68 ohm resistor that >you have suggested, and several alligator clips. 1/32)" is the right size tubing depending on the fan's wiring gauge. > ... For example the Zalman resistor Mike If I understand this correctly, you are say these:> linked wasn't a great picture but appears to be striped: > Green, Blue, Black, Gold, which is a 56 Ohm 5% tolerance > resistor. > Generally speaking, the faster the fan is at default (12V), > the lower the value of the resistor to use to reduce it's > speed. This initially seems contrary to reason but is due > to the lower resistance of the fan's windings & circuit. I > expect 68 ohms to not be a large enough value but I do not > have any of that particular model of fan to experiment with. - We could have gone down to 56 ohm for maximum reduction of fan speed and (hopefully) noise. But we may run the risk of the fan fails to start spinning. - In order to reduce the chance of fan failure to start spinning while still cutting down noise, we may want to choose a 68 ohm resistor instread of a 56 ohm version. This makes sense to me. Thanks. > The heatshrink tubing is very handy too, maybe 3/32 (+- Yes, I have already had a pack of heatshrink tubing left over from my> 1/32)" is the right size tubing depending on the fan's > wiring gauge. previous project of re-wiring some phone-cables in my basement. Therefore, I don't need to buy any more of this. Your reminder will be helpful for people who may jump into the middle of this thread without seeing prior discussion of using heatshrink tubing though. Have a happy St. Patrick Day! Jay Chan <jaykc***@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Show quoteHide quote news:1111070154.105546.77570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... You've got it backwards. Lower value resistor means faster spinning fan.> > ... For example the Zalman resistor Mike > > linked wasn't a great picture but appears to be striped: > > Green, Blue, Black, Gold, which is a 56 Ohm 5% tolerance > > resistor. > > Generally speaking, the faster the fan is at default (12V), > > the lower the value of the resistor to use to reduce it's > > speed. This initially seems contrary to reason but is due > > to the lower resistance of the fan's windings & circuit. I > > expect 68 ohms to not be a large enough value but I do not > > have any of that particular model of fan to experiment with. > > If I understand this correctly, you are say these: > > - We could have gone down to 56 ohm for maximum reduction of fan speed > and (hopefully) noise. But we may run the risk of the fan fails to > start spinning. Having no resistor is the same a 0 ohms. > Adding a 68 ohm resistor will slow the fan more than the 56 ohms.> - In order to reduce the chance of fan failure to start spinning while > still cutting down noise, we may want to choose a 68 ohm resistor > instread of a 56 ohm version. On 17 Mar 2005 06:35:54 -0800, jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >> ... For example the Zalman resistor Mike No, it varies based on what fan is used. Per the same fan,>> linked wasn't a great picture but appears to be striped: >> Green, Blue, Black, Gold, which is a 56 Ohm 5% tolerance >> resistor. >> Generally speaking, the faster the fan is at default (12V), >> the lower the value of the resistor to use to reduce it's >> speed. This initially seems contrary to reason but is due >> to the lower resistance of the fan's windings & circuit. I >> expect 68 ohms to not be a large enough value but I do not >> have any of that particular model of fan to experiment with. > >If I understand this correctly, you are say these: > >- We could have gone down to 56 ohm for maximum reduction of fan speed >and (hopefully) noise. But we may run the risk of the fan fails to >start spinning. the higher resistance would reduce speed more and have higher chance of failure to spin up. Per a different fan that starts out (with no resistor) having higher RPM, current, a lower valued resistor would be used than for the (unmodified) slower fan. > No, the chance of fan failure (to spin up) would be higher>- In order to reduce the chance of fan failure to start spinning while >still cutting down noise, we may want to choose a 68 ohm resistor >instread of a 56 ohm version. > >This makes sense to me. Thanks. with 68 Ohm, BUT as I mentioned previously, the value (range) applicable to a particular fan is different than for a (different) fan. It cannot be assumed that 68 or 56 Ohm will have same result with one fan as another. For your fan the threshold might be much higher, like around 160 Ohm. I cannot predict this as I don't have your fan. Similar (but only slightly faster) fans I've had can use over 120 Ohm, but there was not much point beyond 120 Ohm as the fan was already inaudible. I presume Zalman chose the 56 Ohm value because the most typical, common fan has amperage spec around .2A, rather than your .05A (IIRC you wrote .6W ?). The majority of people seeking fan noise reduction started out with a much louder fan that "usually, typically" needs a lower resistor value than you should, but again I don't have that specific model of fan so I can only speculate based on experience with other fans. Thanks for the correction that you and Noozer have pointed out. I got
it backward. The higher ohm rating should mean higher resistance and the fan will run slower and supposedly quieter. > No, it varies based on what fan is used. Per the same fan, Seem like this is one more reason to get a range of resistors instead> the higher resistance would reduce speed more and have > higher chance of failure to spin up. Per a different fan > that starts out (with no resistor) having higher RPM, > current, a lower valued resistor would be used than for the > (unmodified) slower fan. of just one. Talking about getting a range of resistors. I cannot find any suitable resistors from RadioShack. Their selection in term of watt is very limited (1/2, 1, 5, 10 watts). I will have to order online and pay shipping. Oh well... Jay Chan jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > Thanks for the correction that you and Noozer have pointed out. I got If you're going to order, might as well get a 100 ohm potentiometer, and> it backward. The higher ohm rating should mean higher resistance and > the fan will run slower and supposedly quieter. > > > No, it varies based on what fan is used. Per the same fan, > > the higher resistance would reduce speed more and have > > higher chance of failure to spin up. Per a different fan > > that starts out (with no resistor) having higher RPM, > > current, a lower valued resistor would be used than for the > > (unmodified) slower fan. > > Seem like this is one more reason to get a range of resistors instead > of just one. Talking about getting a range of resistors. I cannot find > any suitable resistors from RadioShack. Their selection in term of watt > is very limited (1/2, 1, 5, 10 watts). I will have to order online and > pay shipping. Oh well... adjust for the noise/cooling of your liking. Let it go full speed when you are out of the room, and much slower when you are around it. > If you're going to order, might as well get a 100 ohm potentiometer, Too late for that, I have already ordered an assorted number ofand > adjust for the noise/cooling of your liking. Let it go full speed when > you are out of the room, and much slower when you are around it. resistors from eBay. And I don't understand potentionmeter enough to know what to do with it. Thanks anyway. I hope someone else who reads this message may find this useful in keeping the noise of his PC down. I was quite surprised that I could only find one place (eBay) that has more than one type of 2-watt resistors that are in the range that I am looking for. Many places don't sell 2-watt any resistor. Those place that sell 2-watt resistors only sell 2-watt resistors in one ohm rating (but I need resistors in a range of ohm ratings). Jay Chan On 18 Mar 2005 05:39:46 -0800, jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >> If you're going to order, might as well get a 100 ohm potentiometer, Generally the parts would be found at electronics supply>and >> adjust for the noise/cooling of your liking. Let it go full speed >when >> you are out of the room, and much slower when you are around it. > >Too late for that, I have already ordered an assorted number of >resistors from eBay. And I don't understand potentionmeter enough to >know what to do with it. Thanks anyway. I hope someone else who reads >this message may find this useful in keeping the noise of his PC down. > >I was quite surprised that I could only find one place (eBay) that has >more than one type of 2-watt resistors that are in the range that I am >looking for. Many places don't sell 2-watt any resistor. Those place >that sell 2-watt resistors only sell 2-watt resistors in one ohm rating >(but I need resistors in a range of ohm ratings). > >Jay Chan houses, online at places like Digikey, Mouser, Newark, Allied Electronics, to name a few. The link I previously gave for the 200 pieces was just one of myriad hit-or-miss surplus type companies that don't always have what you need, but when they do it's often cheaper. Main problem with many suppliers is minimum order requirements like $25. Digikey comes to mind as one that doesn't have the minimum order requirement. Previously a 100 Ohm POT had been mentioned. POTs generally do not have sufficient current capability for a fan, or rather, when they do they're called rheostats rather than POTs. A POT would be better for fine-tuning something like a LM317 based fan control, but then probably not 100 Ohm range. More elaborate fan controllers have their place with those desiring more frequent changing of speed but higher cost, time to construct, size, etc, make them less viable for this kind of simple mod. On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:48:57 GMT, kony <spam@spam.com>
wrote: <snip> > Main problem with many Correction- Digikey does have a <$25 small order fee ($5),>suppliers is minimum order requirements like $25. Digikey >comes to mind as one that doesn't have the minimum order >requirement. I was thinking of Mouser, https://www.mouser.com. jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
> I was quite surprised that I could only find one place (eBay) that has Why 2-watt? Even at a 5 volt drop, current would have to be 0.4a to> more than one type of 2-watt resistors that are in the range that I am > looking for. Many places don't sell 2-watt any resistor. Those place > that sell 2-watt resistors only sell 2-watt resistors in one ohm rating > (but I need resistors in a range of ohm ratings). equal 2 watts. At 7v (a 5 volt drop), most 12v fans draw in the 0.05-0.1a range. I've used 1w carbon resistors (much smaller) and they hardly get warm. On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:49:53 -0800, ric <nospam@home.com>
wrote: >jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote: True, either 1 or 2W could work for this specific> >> I was quite surprised that I could only find one place (eBay) that has >> more than one type of 2-watt resistors that are in the range that I am >> looking for. Many places don't sell 2-watt any resistor. Those place >> that sell 2-watt resistors only sell 2-watt resistors in one ohm rating >> (but I need resistors in a range of ohm ratings). > >Why 2-watt? Even at a 5 volt drop, current would have to be 0.4a to >equal 2 watts. At 7v (a 5 volt drop), most 12v fans draw in the 0.05-0.1a >range. I've used 1w carbon resistors (much smaller) and they hardly get >warm. application, but the 2W seems potentially less problematic. At the time I didn't realize OP would have problems finding them or go to ebay for these. Why not 2W? Typically one does not try to match up watt per watt on power resistors, rather using what the space and budget allow, overengineering them. It's not a PCB space issue and cost is maybe a few cents, or maybe even cheaper per piece since this is spot-pricing on items not often (percentagewise) sold 1 at a time. Yes, 1W would usually work, but IMO, 2W is as good or better choice if someone has nothing (yet). Also, "barely" warm is a relative term. They can and do get warm, even 2W, and some components in a PC/router/etc shouldn't be placed in contact with a "warm" power resistor. Granted in this one instance it shouldn't get as warm as others. The installer could isolate it, but then has to consider that method and typical nylon wire-ties aren't so great if the resistor did get more than warm. The router itself will already be warm inside, hence the need for the fan. Metal, well, sure if challenged we could all think up some way to do it but ultimately choosing a larger resistor also results in lower thermal density, it's not going to be as hot against (whatever it's touching if it were touching anything). kony wrote:
> True, either 1 or 2W could work for this specific Only because I found a good assortment of 1W carbon resistors at> application, but the 2W seems potentially less problematic. > At the time I didn't realize OP would have problems finding > them or go to ebay for these. > > Why not 2W? Typically one does not try to match up watt per > watt on power resistors, rather using what the space and > budget allow, overengineering them. It's not a PCB space > issue and cost is maybe a few cents, or maybe even cheaper > per piece since this is spot-pricing on items not often > (percentagewise) sold 1 at a time. Yes, 1W would usually > work, but IMO, 2W is as good or better choice if someone has > nothing (yet). my local Radio Shack. 2W? No such luck. 1W is plenty. On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:12:07 -0800, ric <nospam@home.com>
wrote: Show quoteHide quote >kony wrote: Do they have one of those packs with several assorted values> >> True, either 1 or 2W could work for this specific >> application, but the 2W seems potentially less problematic. >> At the time I didn't realize OP would have problems finding >> them or go to ebay for these. >> >> Why not 2W? Typically one does not try to match up watt per >> watt on power resistors, rather using what the space and >> budget allow, overengineering them. It's not a PCB space >> issue and cost is maybe a few cents, or maybe even cheaper >> per piece since this is spot-pricing on items not often >> (percentagewise) sold 1 at a time. Yes, 1W would usually >> work, but IMO, 2W is as good or better choice if someone has >> nothing (yet). > >Only because I found a good assortment of 1W carbon resistors at >my local Radio Shack. 2W? No such luck. 1W is plenty. inside or is one forced to buy the individual smaller packs? I suppose it could depend on the store too, those I've been to in the past couple years seem to have scaled back their stock of these types of components. The individual packs from Radio Shack always seem wildly overpriced to me, though it could be a good idea for only a few values. kony wrote:
> >Only because I found a good assortment of 1W carbon resistors at Man, this was years ago. Before I started using potentiometers. As I> >my local Radio Shack. 2W? No such luck. 1W is plenty. > > Do they have one of those packs with several assorted values > inside or is one forced to buy the individual smaller packs? > I suppose it could depend on the store too, those I've been > to in the past couple years seem to have scaled back their > stock of these types of components. The individual packs > from Radio Shack always seem wildly overpriced to me, though > it could be a good idea for only a few values. remember, each package had about 5 resistors of the same value. That store isn't even there any more. Progress! > I didn't see any on Radio Shack's website, maybe I
http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G14511&variation=&aitem=2&mitem=11
> overlooked them but I dug up another source, might as well > get a good deal on 'em? > > Yesterday, I browsed around to look for 2-watt resistors, and I was surpised that I could only find one vendor (in eBay) that offered resistors in a range of ohm ratings. Most places don't sell any 2-watt resistors. Now, I _really_ appreciate the fact that you had spent the time in digging up a link for 2-watt resistors. That had to be quite hard. Jay Chan On 18 Mar 2005 05:43:57 -0800, jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >> I didn't see any on Radio Shack's website, maybe I Well I've bought stuff from them before... plus I've heard>> overlooked them but I dug up another source, might as well >> get a good deal on 'em? >> >> >http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G14511&variation=&aitem=2&mitem=11 > >Yesterday, I browsed around to look for 2-watt resistors, and I was >surpised that I could only find one vendor (in eBay) that offered >resistors in a range of ohm ratings. Most places don't sell any 2-watt >resistors. Now, I _really_ appreciate the fact that you had spent the >time in digging up a link for 2-watt resistors. That had to be quite >hard. > >Jay Chan of others calling, asking them to send very small items in an envelope for cheapest shipping/total-cost. In another post I listed a few more full-featured electronics companies with online stores... generally such parts would come from electronics-oriented companies rather than computer focused. > Well I've bought stuff from them before... plus I've heard I finally use the following power resistor from eBay to reduce the> of others calling, asking them to send very small items in > an envelope for cheapest shipping/total-cost. In another > post I listed a few more full-featured electronics companies > with online stores... generally such parts would come from > electronics-oriented companies rather than computer focused. speed to the point that the noisy gigabit switch is now very quiet: 100 ohm 2W 5% carbon composite I have a feeling that I still have more air flow from the new 60mm fan with reduced speed than what the old noisy 40mm fan can produce in full speed. This means I could have reduced the speed further. Obviusly, I am not going to mess with something that is working so well (plus the fact that this is so difficult to find that type of power resistors). But just for the purpose of curiosity, which rating of power resistor would you recommend if someone in my situation wanted to further reduce the fan speed slightly. Thanks for your help and any other info that you may provide in the future. Jay Chan On 4 Apr 2005 08:20:11 -0700, jaykc***@hotmail.com wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >> Well I've bought stuff from them before... plus I've heard I dont' know how much further that particular fan will>> of others calling, asking them to send very small items in >> an envelope for cheapest shipping/total-cost. In another >> post I listed a few more full-featured electronics companies >> with online stores... generally such parts would come from >> electronics-oriented companies rather than computer focused. > >I finally use the following power resistor from eBay to reduce the >speed to the point that the noisy gigabit switch is now very quiet: > > 100 ohm 2W 5% carbon composite > >I have a feeling that I still have more air flow from the new 60mm fan >with reduced speed than what the old noisy 40mm fan can produce in full >speed. This means I could have reduced the speed further. Obviusly, I >am not going to mess with something that is working so well (plus the >fact that this is so difficult to find that type of power resistors). >But just for the purpose of curiosity, which rating of power resistor >would you recommend if someone in my situation wanted to further reduce >the fan speed slightly. > >Thanks for your help and any other info that you may provide in the >future. > >Jay Chan tolerate a voltage drop so I can't help much. Past a certain point a larger resistor will prevent it from spinning up which obviously should be avoided. I doubt you could use 220 Ohm but slightly higher than 100 Ohm might be possible. If would be easiest to use a rheostat (variable power resistor) to determine the maximum resistance value then keep the (more expensive and large) rheostat for some future use (like more fan resistor sizing?) and put in the appropriate value of resistor in it's place. kony wrote:
> I dont' know how much further that particular fan will Placing a cap in parallel with the resistor seems to cure startup > tolerate a voltage drop so I can't help much. Past a > certain point a larger resistor will prevent it from > spinning up which obviously should be avoided. problems. On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:04:54 -0700, ric <nospam@home.com>
wrote: >kony wrote: "Cure"?> >> I dont' know how much further that particular fan will >> tolerate a voltage drop so I can't help much. Past a >> certain point a larger resistor will prevent it from >> spinning up which obviously should be avoided. > >Placing a cap in parallel with the resistor seems to cure startup >problems. To what extent? I mean, does it actually allow a lower working RPM then or just offset the overly high resistance? This is an interesting idea, do you have an example of what gain there will be for any particular fan? kony wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > ric <nospam@home.com> wrote: This is probably just plain dangerous to the rest of your system. >> kony wrote: >> >>> I dont' know how much further that particular fan will >>> tolerate a voltage drop so I can't help much. Past a >>> certain point a larger resistor will prevent it from >>> spinning up which obviously should be avoided. >> >> Placing a cap in parallel with the resistor seems to cure startup >> problems. > > "Cure"? > To what extent? > I mean, does it actually allow a lower working RPM then or > just offset the overly high resistance? > > This is an interesting idea, do you have an example of what > gain there will be for any particular fan? It would depend on "giving a kick" at turn-on, provided that the power supply had a rapid rise time. If the fan ever gets stalled in normal operation the kick is not there, and the thing just sits and encourages the rest of the system to cook. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:31:52 GMT, CBFalconer
<cbfalco***@yahoo.com> wrote: Show quoteHide quote >kony wrote: What I'm suspecting is that if a cap were in parallel, a>> ric <nospam@home.com> wrote: >>> kony wrote: >>> >>>> I dont' know how much further that particular fan will >>>> tolerate a voltage drop so I can't help much. Past a >>>> certain point a larger resistor will prevent it from >>>> spinning up which obviously should be avoided. >>> >>> Placing a cap in parallel with the resistor seems to cure startup >>> problems. >> >> "Cure"? >> To what extent? >> I mean, does it actually allow a lower working RPM then or >> just offset the overly high resistance? >> >> This is an interesting idea, do you have an example of what >> gain there will be for any particular fan? > >This is probably just plain dangerous to the rest of your system. >It would depend on "giving a kick" at turn-on, provided that the >power supply had a rapid rise time. If the fan ever gets stalled >in normal operation the kick is not there, and the thing just sits >and encourages the rest of the system to cook. bypass for the power to the fan, it would just make matters worse because whatever the turn-on delay was already, adding more capacitance will only lengthen that delay. Ric wrote about it being parallel with the resistor though, so i presume actually paralleled to it, bypassing it on the same power lead. While that can be a crude but effective filter for some noise reduction, I'd not heard of anyone employing anything like this for fans. Sometimes it's not even, merely a matter of getting the fan to spin-up though, with some fans there will be pulsation below a certain RPM, actually making the fan louder than if it were running slightly faster-enough to eliminate this pulsation. Offhand I'd speculate that it pulsating occurs due to stronger (permanent) magnetic field in some fans than others. IE- It seems more common in >= 120 x 32mm, large thick fans. kony wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > <cbfalco***@yahoo.com> wrote: No suspicion needed. It forms a simple high pass filter. Very>> kony wrote: >>> ric <nospam@home.com> wrote: >>>> kony wrote: >>>> >>>>> I dont' know how much further that particular fan will >>>>> tolerate a voltage drop so I can't help much. Past a >>>>> certain point a larger resistor will prevent it from >>>>> spinning up which obviously should be avoided. >>>> >>>> Placing a cap in parallel with the resistor seems to cure startup >>>> problems. >>> >>> "Cure"? >>> To what extent? >>> I mean, does it actually allow a lower working RPM then or >>> just offset the overly high resistance? >>> >>> This is an interesting idea, do you have an example of what >>> gain there will be for any particular fan? >> >> This is probably just plain dangerous to the rest of your system. >> It would depend on "giving a kick" at turn-on, provided that the >> power supply had a rapid rise time. If the fan ever gets stalled >> in normal operation the kick is not there, and the thing just sits >> and encourages the rest of the system to cook. > > What I'm suspecting is that if a cap were in parallel, a > bypass for the power to the fan, it would just make matters > worse because whatever the turn-on delay was already, adding > more capacitance will only lengthen that delay. straight forward. Once the cap is charged it has no further effect. The charging current, as the power comes on, supplies the initial start-up boost. -- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson kony wrote:
> >Placing a cap in parallel with the resistor seems to cure startup For fans that will spin at, for example, 5 volts but have startup> >problems. > > "Cure"? > To what extent? > I mean, does it actually allow a lower working RPM then or > just offset the overly high resistance? problems, the cap acts as a short at startup, allowing the full 12v to reach the fan, then charging to the resistor's dropping voltage. I normally use a 10uF, 15v electrolytic. [Get the polarity right!] > This is an interesting idea, do you have an example of what Not off hand. No gain in operational function. But it sure cures the> gain there will be for any particular fan? "I have to help my fan start" blues. > >> I didn't see any on Radio Shack's website, maybe I Seem like what you have suggested previously probably is a better> >> overlooked them but I dug up another source, might as well > >> get a good deal on 'em? > >> > >> > >http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G14511&variation=&aitem=2&mitem=11 choice than what I end up buying. Yours is 120 ohm, and what I get is 100 ohm. Your probably can reduce the fan speed slightly better than what I get can do. Moreover, yours is _much_ cheaper than what I have paid for ($20). Oh well... Jay Chan |
|||||||||||||||||||||||