|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CPU, RAM and Motherboard grim...
I have a motherboard which officially supports upto althon 3000+ but has a overclock function which could push the FBS to 200Mhz. Because of that overclock function, I bought a 3200+ to give it a try... (which runs at 200mhz), I have also bought 1G of 400mhz DDR RAM just to hope that it runs But when I try it, I found that the furthest that I can set is 194mhz fsb... I know you guys probably say that why bothered, buy another motherboard, but since I am short of money now, I need to wait for next month before I can get a new one... For the moment, should I run it at 166mhz(333mhz) which the motherboard supports, but the 3200+ shows as 2500+ only...??? or should I run both the ram and the cpu at 194 (388mhz)??? Which would be faster? Is there any problem running the RAM and CPU at 388mhz, given that, the CPU and RAM both supports upto 400mhz?? Would it damage the CPU/RAM? Thx or should I run the RAM/CPU asynchronisely?
Thx Kevin Lam wrote: Show quoteHide quote > Hi all, I hope someone could help me with this... > > I have a motherboard which officially supports upto althon 3000+ but > has a overclock function which could push the FBS to 200Mhz. > > Because of that overclock function, I bought a 3200+ to give it a > try... (which runs at 200mhz), I have also bought 1G of 400mhz DDR RAM > just to hope that it runs > > But when I try it, I found that the furthest that I can set is 194mhz > fsb... > > I know you guys probably say that why bothered, buy another > motherboard, but since I am short of money now, I need to wait for > next month before I can get a new one... > > For the moment, should I run it at 166mhz(333mhz) which the > motherboard supports, but the 3200+ shows as 2500+ only...??? or > should I run both the ram and the cpu at 194 (388mhz)??? Which would > be faster? > > Is there any problem running the RAM and CPU at 388mhz, given that, > the CPU and RAM both supports upto 400mhz?? Would it damage the > CPU/RAM? > > Thx On 21 Feb 2005 14:40:50 -0800, sorchu***@hotmail.com wrote:
>or should I run the RAM/CPU asynchronisely? no> On 21 Feb 2005 14:04:48 -0800, sorchu***@hotmail.com (Kevin
Lam) wrote: >Hi all, I hope someone could help me with this... Generally it's better not to try handling specific> >I have a motherboard which officially supports upto althon 3000+ but >has a overclock function which could push the FBS to 200Mhz. situations with generalities. IE- list your hardware, namely the motherboard and it's chipset. > Most often that means you need change a jumper, in general.>Because of that overclock function, I bought a 3200+ to give it a >try... (which runs at 200mhz), I have also bought 1G of 400mhz DDR RAM >just to hope that it runs > >But when I try it, I found that the furthest that I can set is 194mhz >fsb... Check the manual. > Clearly the 194 would be, but make sure the board uses the>I know you guys probably say that why bothered, buy another >motherboard, but since I am short of money now, I need to wait for >next month before I can get a new one... > >For the moment, should I run it at 166mhz(333mhz) which the >motherboard supports, but the 3200+ shows as 2500+ only...??? or >should I run both the ram and the cpu at 194 (388mhz)??? Which would >be faster? higher PCI divider at 194, so the PCI bus isn't out of spec. If it's an nForce motherboard you don't have that issue so long as bios is set to "auto" (or whatever, can vary per board) as they support locked PCI & AGP bus speed such that you can pick any FSB that (would otherwise) run stable. > No, being under-spec for the two it is not an issue.>Is there any problem running the RAM and CPU at 388mhz, given that, >the CPU and RAM both supports upto 400mhz?? Would it damage the >CPU/RAM? HOWEVER, you still have to deal with the issue of the motherboard, that overclocking IT, and/or it's bios issues, the flexibility in setting that bus speed and supportive PCI & AGP bus speeds, could be problematic. Specifically an overclocked PCI bus can tend to make network adapters, IDE controllers, and USB malfunction.... other problems too but most often, those 3 problems surface first, at lower (overclocked) PCI bus speeds than others. First I'd determine why the board isn't allowing 200MHz/DDR400 FSB. I"m inclined to think that if the board really doesn't allow 200MHz/DDR400 under ANY circumstances, that it doesn't have the PCI divisor ability to run 194MHz/DDR388, either... but I don't often try to run 194, could be mistaken.
Power supplies
on speed - any good or not? Few RAID0 Questions Computer sometimes doesn't turn on What's the difference with motherboards? For people in the US Compusa is having a pretty good sale today One semi bad pixel on my LCD - it strange Adding HDD,s how to clean insertion pins? Will low level formatting rescue a clunking hard disk? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||