|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
how to grab raw dv from camcorder to XPHello,
I am looking for a utility to grab footage from a MiniDV camcorder to a computer running Windows XP Pro in raw dv format. >From a little google search, I have discovered WinDV and DVIO (and there was one other), all free utilities to grab video from a camerainto a computer. However, they grab the video in avi format. Any tools that would allow me to grab the video into Windows XP in raw dv format? I usually work in Linux, and we have dvgrab and Kino in Linux which serve my purpose excellently. Not familiar with the tools in Windows, hence this qeury. thanks, ->HS On 1/13/2007, hs.sa***@gmail.com posted this:
Show quote > Hello, Unfortunately, it doesn't exist in raw DV format. What the utilities > > I am looking for a utility to grab footage from a MiniDV camcorder to a > computer running Windows XP Pro in raw dv format. > >> From a little google search, I have discovered WinDV and DVIO (and > there was one other), all free utilities to grab video from a camera > into a computer. However, they grab the video in avi format. > > Any tools that would allow me to grab the video into Windows XP in raw > dv format? I usually work in Linux, and we have dvgrab and Kino in > Linux which serve my purpose excellently. Not familiar with the tools > in Windows, hence this qeury. > > thanks, > ->HS grab is a bit-wise copy of what's on the tape, or in pass-through mode, a bit-wise copy of what comes out of the conversion electronics. -- Gene E. Bloch (Gino) letters617blochg3251 (replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom") Gene E. Bloch wrote:
> Unfortunately, it doesn't exist in raw DV format. What the utilities So, if the bitwise copy of the data on the tape is not raw dv data,> grab is a bit-wise copy of what's on the tape, or in pass-through mode, > a bit-wise copy of what comes out of the conversion electronics. then what is? And also, since the utilities that I mentioned above give avi files, surely the tape does not have avil files on it, does it? ->HS The .avi format is just a wrapper for the dv data off the tape. On a
Mac the wrapper is Quicktime, giving a .mov suffix. Either way, the data is the same, and there doesn't seem to be much point in fiddling with it - though I'm intrigued enough to ask why you would want to.........? Bernie bernie wrote:
> The .avi format is just a wrapper for the dv data off the tape. On a Doesn't look like the data is the same in dv and avi files (honestly, I> Mac the wrapper is Quicktime, giving a .mov suffix. Either way, the > data is the same, and there doesn't seem to be much point in fiddling am a bit fuzzy about all this): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DV (see Application Software Support section) And even if the actuall data is not altered, the wrapper just consumes more disk space. Finally, it appears that there are different things that varous avi formats can do. So to keep things simple (and files shorter), I just stick to raw dv. Moreover, kino is perfectly happy with dv. I have to deal with Windows at a volunteer work I am currently doing for some family friends. The work around at present is that I just bring over their camcorder to my place and dvgrab the tape data. For various reasons, it would be more convenient for me to grab the raw dv data in Windows XP at their place itself. ->HS Out here in the non-Linux world of Mac and Windows, DV is always
handled as either .avi or .mov. All applications that use DV are set up to do that. There's no data or quality loss in moving the stuff around between files, as it's always in the DV codec no matter what the wrapper. Millions of users including major broadcasters find it very satisfactory....and when you're digitising video, the files are going to be enormous no matter what, so no point in trading off complexity against a little disc space. I just read the spec for Kino - "It does not support multiple layers or tracks of video and audio" - which makes it a very basic editor indeed! Windows Movie Maker and iMovie are probably better specced, and both are free. Maybe time to upgrade a touch.... Bernie bernie wrote:
> Out here in the non-Linux world of Mac and Windows, DV is always Okay. I will look into avi and mov files as well. Is there a particular> handled as either .avi or .mov. All applications that use DV are set up > to do that. There's no data or quality loss in moving the stuff around > between files, as it's always in the DV codec no matter what the avi format that the broadcasters use? > I just read the spec for Kino - "It does not support multiple layers or Yes, very basic. For heavy duty stuff, there is cinelerra> tracks of video and audio" - which makes it a very basic editor indeed! (http://heroinewarrior.com/cinelerra.php3). It is free, open source, and can use multiple computers to render a movie (render farm, I think they call it). I haven't had the need to use that powerful a software yet for my home videos. > Windows Movie Maker and iMovie are probably better specced, and both Have no idea about Windows Movie Maker, but iMovie seems nice. It has> are free. those nice ready made animated titler sequences, and seem pretty easy to use. And it is fast too. But is not much configurable by the user -- everything seems to be done behind the scenes. For a half hour movie we tried with Kino and iMovie on a Mac Book Pro, iMovie finished rendering it half the time as Kino. Both were on more or less similar hardware spec'ed computers. BTW, it is nice to know that Movie Maker is free (of cost). > Maybe time to upgrade a touch.... Well, if I have to move to Windows just to use Movie Maker, that issomething I can never call an upgrade :) . Even though I am more or less used to both (use mainly Linux and sometimes Windows at my univ.), to setup a Windows computer at home for personal use (or move from Linux to a new XP OS) involves prohibitive costs for me. Thanks for the pointers, regards, ->HS Show quote > Bernie Actually, the best - in my opinion - editor of all is Final Cut Pro for
the Mac, but on the pc you can get Avid FreeDV - http://www.avid.com/freedv/resources.asp - for, surprise, free, and in a whole different class to anything availalbe on Linux. As I said .avi and .mov are only wrappers, and broadcasting organisations, like everyone else, use many differerent codecs inside those wrappers. If you're using DV you generally just stick to it until the point of delivery when you pick something appropriate - VHS maybe. B |
|||||||||||||||||||||||