|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Netflix vs. Blockbuster Online Rentalsdecided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per month. I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a limited supply of documentaries and independent films. Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS of stores with a limited selection of movies. I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete, they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that Blockbuster can't even copy correctly. In article <1109295201.174034.299***@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
strum4l***@hotmail.com says... Show quote > I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I Thanks, Netflix employee #112.> decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per > month. > > I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main > reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like > Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited > floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will > appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so > now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a > limited supply of documentaries and independent films. > > Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all > their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of > movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS > of stores with a limited selection of movies. > > I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people > rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at > corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete, > they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they > launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their > traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better > selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that > Blockbuster can't even copy correctly. > > On 2/24/2005 7:34:11 PM, theyak wrote:
> Thanks, Netflix employee #112. Thanks, Blockbuster employee #223.-- "Wow! Eye of the tiger, mouth of a Teamster." Now playing: "Uriah Heep - Rock 'n' Roll Medley" In article <12ud9pnjmw1mc$.***@tarkus.karnevil9.com>,
Tarkus <karnev***@beer.com> wrote: > > Thanks, Netflix employee #112. Damn! You beat me to it! Sorry! :)> > Thanks, Blockbuster employee #223. In article <regdwight-475A42.21142424022***@news.verizon.net>,
regdwi***@verizon.net says... > In article <12ud9pnjmw1mc$.***@tarkus.karnevil9.com>, Nope, I have both a blockbuster and netflix account. I figure with 2, > Tarkus <karnev***@beer.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks, Netflix employee #112. > > > > Thanks, Blockbuster employee #223. > > Damn! You beat me to it! Sorry! :) > that should cut down on any "undesirable customer" problems with either. In article <MPG.1c885a87438a64fd989***@news.easynews.com>,
theyak <y**@dev.null> wrote: > Thanks, Netflix employee #112. Said BallBuster employee #747,218In article <1109295201.174034.299***@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, Boo
<strum4l***@hotmail.com> wrote: Show quote > I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I Which makes it all the more annoying that Netflix is still missing a> decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per > month. > > I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main > reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like > Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited > floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will > appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so > now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a > limited supply of documentaries and independent films. > > Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all > their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of > movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS > of stores with a limited selection of movies. > > I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people > rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at > corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete, > they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they > launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their > traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better > selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that > Blockbuster can't even copy correctly. > number of movies that are at my local Blockbusters. In a perfect world we could rent online for a reasonable per dvd price ($1.50-$2.00) and pick whichever service had the title we want. NO one rental place is going to have everything, given the number of releases, and I'd like to see specialty sites spring up. -- Chris Mack "Refugee, total sh*t. That's how I've always seen us. 'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us." -'Deal/No Deal', CHESS In article <240220052255308226%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com
says... Show quote > In article <1109295201.174034.299***@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, Boo www.greencine.com> <strum4l***@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I > > decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per > > month. > > > > I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main > > reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like > > Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited > > floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will > > appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so > > now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a > > limited supply of documentaries and independent films. > > > > Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all > > their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of > > movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS > > of stores with a limited selection of movies. > > > > I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people > > rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at > > corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete, > > they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they > > launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their > > traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better > > selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that > > Blockbuster can't even copy correctly. > > > Which makes it all the more annoying that Netflix is still missing a > number of movies that are at my local Blockbusters. In a perfect world > we could rent online for a reasonable per dvd price ($1.50-$2.00) and > pick whichever service had the title we want. NO one rental place is > going to have everything, given the number of releases, and I'd like to > see specialty sites spring up. > > It's all specialty. In article <MPG.1c893e501226ef47989***@news.easynews.com>, theyak
<y**@dev.null> wrote: Show quote > In article <240220052255308226%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com Yes, interesting site. Still, you have to pay a monthly fee. I can only> says... > > Which makes it all the more annoying that Netflix is still missing a > > number of movies that are at my local Blockbusters. In a perfect world > > we could rent online for a reasonable per dvd price ($1.50-$2.00) and > > pick whichever service had the title we want. NO one rental place is > > going to have everything, given the number of releases, and I'd like to > > see specialty sites spring up. > > > > > > > www.greencine.com > > It's all specialty. > justify paying for one such site, so would have to drop Netflix and thus lose access to non-specialty films. I REALLY want to be able to rent two movies from one site, 5 from another, etc, and just pay for the movies I rent. -- Chris Mack "Refugee, total sh*t. That's how I've always seen us. 'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us." -'Deal/No Deal', CHESS In article <260220051333476534%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com
says... Show quote > In article <MPG.1c893e501226ef47989***@news.easynews.com>, theyak Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that I > <y**@dev.null> wrote: > > > In article <240220052255308226%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com > > says... > > > > Which makes it all the more annoying that Netflix is still missing a > > > number of movies that are at my local Blockbusters. In a perfect world > > > we could rent online for a reasonable per dvd price ($1.50-$2.00) and > > > pick whichever service had the title we want. NO one rental place is > > > going to have everything, given the number of releases, and I'd like to > > > see specialty sites spring up. > > > > > > > > > > > > www.greencine.com > > > > It's all specialty. > > > Yes, interesting site. Still, you have to pay a monthly fee. I can only > justify paying for one such site, so would have to drop Netflix and > thus lose access to non-specialty films. I REALLY want to be able to > rent two movies from one site, 5 from another, etc, and just pay for > the movies I rent. > > know of. In article <MPG.1c8a8d54d2dc173c989***@news.easynews.com>, theyak
<y**@dev.null> wrote: Show quote > In article <260220051333476534%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com Sounds like an opening for new companies, instead of going against> says... > > Yes, interesting site. Still, you have to pay a monthly fee. I can only > > justify paying for one such site, so would have to drop Netflix and > > thus lose access to non-specialty films. I REALLY want to be able to > > rent two movies from one site, 5 from another, etc, and just pay for > > the movies I rent. > > > > > > > Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that I > know of. Netflix head to head... -- Chris Mack "Refugee, total sh*t. That's how I've always seen us. 'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us." -'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
Show quote
"Invid Fan" <in***@localnet.com> wrote in message Netflix used to be 'ala carte' - i.e., pay for each movie you rent. They news:260220051643068036%invid@localnet.com... > In article <MPG.1c8a8d54d2dc173c989***@news.easynews.com>, theyak > <y**@dev.null> wrote: > >> In article <260220051333476534%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com >> says... > >> > Yes, interesting site. Still, you have to pay a monthly fee. I can only >> > justify paying for one such site, so would have to drop Netflix and >> > thus lose access to non-specialty films. I REALLY want to be able to >> > rent two movies from one site, 5 from another, etc, and just pay for >> > the movies I rent. >> > >> > >> >> >> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that I >> know of. > > Sounds like an opening for new companies, instead of going against > Netflix head to head... did this for the first two or three years of their existence; they changed to 'subscription' about 5 or 6 years ago. On 2/26/2005 11:37:41 AM, theyak wrote:
> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that I There is for porn. I'm not sure about mainstream DVDs. I would think> know of. so. -- "Some folks call it a sling blade, I call it a kaiser blade." Now playing: "Uriah Heep - Sell Your Soul" theyak <y**@dev.null> wrote:
> There's DVD Overnight, but I've never personally tried them.> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that > I know of. http://www.dvdovernight.com Manda On 2/27/2005 5:50:26 AM, Manda wrote:
> theyak <y**@dev.null> wrote: I used them a few years ago and was very pleased with their service.> >> >> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that >> I know of. > > There's DVD Overnight, but I've never personally tried them. > > http://www.dvdovernight.com -- "How can you destroy an army that's already dead?" Now playing: "Uriah Heep - Too Scared to Run" I prefer Blockbuster's $14.99 plan with two free in-store game rentals per month
(a $12.00 value). -- "I'm not a cool person in real life, but I play one on the Internet" Galley "Galley" <Galley@Spam-Jammer.galleytech.com> wrote in message Blockbuster is probably ok if your tastes lean more toward the mass market, news:rgit11d0f7bmt0b1jles3ua1gqf7hf789p@4ax.com... >I prefer Blockbuster's $14.99 plan with two free in-store game rentals per >month > (a $12.00 value). > > > -- > "I'm not a cool person in real life, but I play one on the Internet" > Galley but I'm with the original poster; Netflix has the better selection of films. Also I refuse to support a rental chain that uses its muscle to influence the content and packaging of the films I watch. In article <t8-dnWTDj9PyQIPfRVn***@comcast.com>,
"HellRazor" <nottel***@no.com> wrote: Are you sure about that? A few people posted a while back that they > Blockbuster is probably ok if your tastes lean more toward the mass market, > but I'm with the original poster; Netflix has the better selection of films. joined and this wasn't quite as accurate as it used to be. I plugged in a number of not-so-common titles a while ago and I recall that they all came up at BB's site. In article <regdwight-4AA013.08304825022***@news.verizon.net>,
regdwi***@verizon.net says... > In article <t8-dnWTDj9PyQIPfRVn***@comcast.com>, see?> "HellRazor" <nottel***@no.com> wrote: > > > Blockbuster is probably ok if your tastes lean more toward the mass market, > > but I'm with the original poster; Netflix has the better selection of films. > > Are you sure about that? A few people posted a while back that they > joined and this wasn't quite as accurate as it used to be. I plugged in > a number of not-so-common titles a while ago and I recall that they all > came up at BB's site. > In article <MPG.1c893be8f28438db989***@news.easynews.com>,
theyak <y**@dev.null> wrote: Show quote > In article <regdwight-4AA013.08304825022***@news.verizon.net>, See what?> regdwi***@verizon.net says... > > In article <t8-dnWTDj9PyQIPfRVn***@comcast.com>, > > "HellRazor" <nottel***@no.com> wrote: > > > > > Blockbuster is probably ok if your tastes lean more toward the mass > > > market, > > > but I'm with the original poster; Netflix has the better selection of > > > films. > > > > Are you sure about that? A few people posted a while back that they > > joined and this wasn't quite as accurate as it used to be. I plugged in > > a number of not-so-common titles a while ago and I recall that they all > > came up at BB's site. > > > > > see? Reginald Dwight wrote:
> See what? More like "see when". Blockbuster is faster than theyused to be. Used to take maybe 5 minutes to display a page (to my home DSL browser) where Netflix took a few seconds. Blockbuster has sped up lately, but still on the glacial side. Would drive me crazy using blockbuster until they sped things up quite a bit more. Mike "Galley" <Galley@Spam-Jammer.galleytech.com> wrote in message I'll be switching back to Netflix when this month's BB subscription ends.news:rgit11d0f7bmt0b1jles3ua1gqf7hf789p@4ax.com... > I prefer Blockbuster's $14.99 plan with two free in-store game rentals per month > (a $12.00 value). Right now I have 25 titles in my BB queue and 17 of those are listed as having a short to long wait. None of those titles are new releases! It's particularly irksome when BB ships discs that are part of a series out of order. I don't want disc 2 before I've watched disc 1!!! The thing that enticed me to switch to BB was the two free in-store rentals, but that too has turn into a source of aggravation. I thought it would be nice to be able to rent a new release on the spur of the moment, but evidently their "No Late Fees" policy is playing hell with thier inventory. I wanted to rent "Saw," but the store didn't have a single copy available. I looked for two other titles, and they too were unavailable. I left in disgust and vowed to move BB to the bottom of my list of places to spend my money! "Joe Kaffe" wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>I'll be switching back to Netflix when this month's BB subscription ends. My understanding from the newsgroup is that Netflix does that too.>Right now I have 25 titles in my BB queue and 17 of those are listed as >having a short to long wait. None of those titles are new releases! It's >particularly irksome when BB ships discs that are part of a series out of >order. I don't want disc 2 before I've watched disc 1!!! Does anybody know whether BB ships the discs of a two-disc movie separately, as Netflix apparently does? -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ DVD FAQ: http://dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html other FAQs: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/faqget.htm On 2/25/2005 7:48:54 PM, Stan Brown wrote:
> "Joe Kaffe" wrote in alt.video.dvd: Yes, it can happen if they're all listed together in your queue. I get>>I'll be switching back to Netflix when this month's BB subscription ends. >>Right now I have 25 titles in my BB queue and 17 of those are listed as >>having a short to long wait. None of those titles are new releases! It's >>particularly irksome when BB ships discs that are part of a series out of >>order. I don't want disc 2 before I've watched disc 1!!! > > My understanding from the newsgroup is that Netflix does that too. around it by leaving all but one near the bottom of my queue, and move the first one up near the top. Then just keep moving them as necessary. -- "How can you destroy an army that's already dead?" Now playing: "Uriah Heep - I'm Alive" "Joe Kaffe" wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>The thing that enticed me to switch to BB was the two free in-store rentals, Gee, that's a surprise ... NOT!>but that too has turn into a source of aggravation. I thought it would be >nice to be able to rent a new release on the spur of the moment, but >evidently their "No Late Fees" policy is playing hell with thier inventory. It was my first reaction after I heard "no late fees" -- the invebntory in stores is going to suck even worse. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ DVD FAQ: http://dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html other FAQs: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/faqget.htm There was a PBS series that I found on blockbuster, but they only had 3
of the 7 DVD's in the series. The other 4 didn't even exist in their inventory. Who would want to watch #1, #5, and #6 in a series? On 25 Feb 2005 21:00:17 -0800, "Boo" <strum4l***@hotmail.com> wrote: Someone who has only 2, 3, 4 and 7? :)>There was a PBS series that I found on blockbuster, but they only had 3 >of the 7 DVD's in the series. The other 4 didn't even exist in their >inventory. Who would want to watch #1, #5, and #6 in a series? Neither Netflix or BB would work for me as I don't regularly watch enough new DVDs in a month to justify the cost. Some months it would be great, but other times it would be wasted money. - -Jon Purkey - <jonpur***@aol.com) For a quicker reply by email please use the address found here: http://tinyurl.com/o8ka In article <cqd1211if1h1d7hgsm7d7fclkv16dqf***@4ax.com>, Jon Purkey
<jonpur***@aol.com> wrote: > On 25 Feb 2005 21:00:17 -0800, "Boo" <strum4l***@hotmail.com> wrote: You do find yourself renting crap just to see how bad it really is. No> > >There was a PBS series that I found on blockbuster, but they only had 3 > >of the 7 DVD's in the series. The other 4 didn't even exist in their > >inventory. Who would want to watch #1, #5, and #6 in a series? > > Someone who has only 2, 3, 4 and 7? :) > > Neither Netflix or BB would work for me as I don't regularly watch > enough new DVDs in a month to justify the cost. Some months it would > be great, but other times it would be wasted money. > idea how much longer I'll stay, although my queue has filled up again with "good" stuff after a month of mostly bad horror films. -- Chris Mack "Refugee, total sh*t. That's how I've always seen us. 'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us." -'Deal/No Deal', CHESS Excellent analysis and one with which I toally agree. Netflix is the
cadillac. Blockbuster, a scooter with a squeaky wheel. Boo wrote: Show quote > I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I > decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per > month. > > I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main > reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like > Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited > floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will > appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so > now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a > limited supply of documentaries and independent films. > > Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all > their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of > movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS > of stores with a limited selection of movies. > > I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people > rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at > corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete, > they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they > launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their > traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better > selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that > Blockbuster can't even copy correctly. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||