Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Netflix vs. Blockbuster Online Rentals

Author
25 Feb 2005 1:33 AM
Boo
I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I
decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per
month.

I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main
reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like
Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited
floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will
appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so
now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a
limited supply of documentaries and independent films.

Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all
their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of
movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS
of stores with a limited selection of movies.

I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people
rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at
corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete,
they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they
launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their
traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better
selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that
Blockbuster can't even copy correctly.

Author
25 Feb 2005 3:34 AM
theyak
In article <1109295201.174034.299***@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
strum4l***@hotmail.com says...
Show quote
> I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I
> decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per
> month.
>
> I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main
> reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like
> Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited
> floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will
> appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so
> now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a
> limited supply of documentaries and independent films.
>
> Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all
> their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of
> movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS
> of stores with a limited selection of movies.
>
> I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people
> rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at
> corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete,
> they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they
> launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their
> traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better
> selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that
> Blockbuster can't even copy correctly.
>
>


Thanks, Netflix employee #112.
Author
25 Feb 2005 4:21 AM
Tarkus
On 2/24/2005 7:34:11 PM, theyak wrote:

> Thanks, Netflix employee #112.

Thanks, Blockbuster employee #223.
--
"Wow!  Eye of the tiger, mouth of a Teamster."

Now playing: "Uriah Heep - Rock 'n' Roll Medley"
Author
25 Feb 2005 5:14 AM
Reginald Dwight
In article <12ud9pnjmw1mc$.***@tarkus.karnevil9.com>,
Tarkus <karnev***@beer.com> wrote:

> > Thanks, Netflix employee #112.
>
> Thanks, Blockbuster employee #223.

Damn! You beat me to it! Sorry! :)
Author
25 Feb 2005 7:35 PM
theyak
In article <regdwight-475A42.21142424022***@news.verizon.net>,
regdwi***@verizon.net says...
> In article <12ud9pnjmw1mc$.***@tarkus.karnevil9.com>,
>  Tarkus <karnev***@beer.com> wrote:
>
> > > Thanks, Netflix employee #112.
> >
> > Thanks, Blockbuster employee #223.
>
> Damn! You beat me to it! Sorry! :)
>


Nope, I have both a blockbuster and netflix account. I figure with 2,
that should cut down on any "undesirable customer" problems with either.
Author
25 Feb 2005 5:13 AM
Reginald Dwight
In article <MPG.1c885a87438a64fd989***@news.easynews.com>,
theyak <y**@dev.null> wrote:

> Thanks, Netflix employee #112.

Said BallBuster employee #747,218
Author
25 Feb 2005 3:55 AM
Invid Fan
In article <1109295201.174034.299***@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, Boo
<strum4l***@hotmail.com> wrote:

Show quote
> I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I
> decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per
> month.
>
> I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main
> reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like
> Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited
> floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will
> appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so
> now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a
> limited supply of documentaries and independent films.
>
> Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all
> their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of
> movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS
> of stores with a limited selection of movies.
>
> I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people
> rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at
> corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete,
> they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they
> launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their
> traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better
> selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that
> Blockbuster can't even copy correctly.
>
Which makes it all the more annoying that Netflix is still missing a
number of movies that are at my local Blockbusters. In a perfect world
we could rent online for a reasonable per dvd price ($1.50-$2.00) and
pick whichever service had the title we want. NO one rental place is
going to have everything, given the number of releases, and I'd like to
see specialty sites spring up.

--
Chris Mack      "Refugee, total sh*t. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan'         Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
                                     -'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
Author
25 Feb 2005 7:45 PM
theyak
In article <240220052255308226%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com
says...
Show quote
> In article <1109295201.174034.299***@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, Boo
> <strum4l***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I
> > decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per
> > month.
> >
> > I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main
> > reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like
> > Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited
> > floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will
> > appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so
> > now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a
> > limited supply of documentaries and independent films.
> >
> > Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all
> > their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of
> > movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS
> > of stores with a limited selection of movies.
> >
> > I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people
> > rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at
> > corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete,
> > they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they
> > launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their
> > traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better
> > selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that
> > Blockbuster can't even copy correctly.
> >
> Which makes it all the more annoying that Netflix is still missing a
> number of movies that are at my local Blockbusters. In a perfect world
> we could rent online for a reasonable per dvd price ($1.50-$2.00) and
> pick whichever service had the title we want. NO one rental place is
> going to have everything, given the number of releases, and I'd like to
> see specialty sites spring up.
>
>


www.greencine.com

It's all specialty.
Author
26 Feb 2005 6:33 PM
Invid Fan
In article <MPG.1c893e501226ef47989***@news.easynews.com>, theyak
<y**@dev.null> wrote:

Show quote
> In article <240220052255308226%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com
> says...

> > Which makes it all the more annoying that Netflix is still missing a
> > number of movies that are at my local Blockbusters. In a perfect world
> > we could rent online for a reasonable per dvd price ($1.50-$2.00) and
> > pick whichever service had the title we want. NO one rental place is
> > going to have everything, given the number of releases, and I'd like to
> > see specialty sites spring up.
> >
> >
>
>
> www.greencine.com
>
> It's all specialty.
>
Yes, interesting site. Still, you have to pay a monthly fee. I can only
justify paying for one such site, so would have to drop Netflix and
thus lose access to non-specialty films. I REALLY want to be able to
rent two movies from one site, 5 from another, etc, and just pay for
the movies I rent.

--
Chris Mack      "Refugee, total sh*t. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan'         Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
                                     -'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
Author
26 Feb 2005 7:37 PM
theyak
In article <260220051333476534%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com
says...
Show quote
> In article <MPG.1c893e501226ef47989***@news.easynews.com>, theyak
> <y**@dev.null> wrote:
>
> > In article <240220052255308226%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com
> > says...
>
> > > Which makes it all the more annoying that Netflix is still missing a
> > > number of movies that are at my local Blockbusters. In a perfect world
> > > we could rent online for a reasonable per dvd price ($1.50-$2.00) and
> > > pick whichever service had the title we want. NO one rental place is
> > > going to have everything, given the number of releases, and I'd like to
> > > see specialty sites spring up.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > www.greencine.com
> >
> > It's all specialty.
> >
> Yes, interesting site. Still, you have to pay a monthly fee. I can only
> justify paying for one such site, so would have to drop Netflix and
> thus lose access to non-specialty films. I REALLY want to be able to
> rent two movies from one site, 5 from another, etc, and just pay for
> the movies I rent.
>
>


Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that I
know of.
Author
26 Feb 2005 9:43 PM
Invid Fan
In article <MPG.1c8a8d54d2dc173c989***@news.easynews.com>, theyak
<y**@dev.null> wrote:

Show quote
> In article <260220051333476534%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com
> says...

> > Yes, interesting site. Still, you have to pay a monthly fee. I can only
> > justify paying for one such site, so would have to drop Netflix and
> > thus lose access to non-specialty films. I REALLY want to be able to
> > rent two movies from one site, 5 from another, etc, and just pay for
> > the movies I rent.
> >
> >
>
>
> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that I
> know of.

Sounds like an opening for new companies, instead of going against
Netflix head to head...

--
Chris Mack      "Refugee, total sh*t. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan'         Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
                                     -'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
Author
27 Feb 2005 1:27 PM
Nonymous
Show quote
"Invid Fan" <in***@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:260220051643068036%invid@localnet.com...
> In article <MPG.1c8a8d54d2dc173c989***@news.easynews.com>, theyak
> <y**@dev.null> wrote:
>
>> In article <260220051333476534%in***@localnet.com>, in***@localnet.com
>> says...
>
>> > Yes, interesting site. Still, you have to pay a monthly fee. I can only
>> > justify paying for one such site, so would have to drop Netflix and
>> > thus lose access to non-specialty films. I REALLY want to be able to
>> > rent two movies from one site, 5 from another, etc, and just pay for
>> > the movies I rent.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that I
>> know of.
>
> Sounds like an opening for new companies, instead of going against
> Netflix head to head...

Netflix used to be 'ala carte' - i.e., pay for each movie you rent.  They
did this for the first two or three years of their existence; they changed
to 'subscription' about 5 or 6 years ago.
Author
27 Feb 2005 6:05 AM
Tarkus
On 2/26/2005 11:37:41 AM, theyak wrote:

> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that I
> know of.

There is for porn.  I'm not sure about mainstream DVDs.  I would think
so.
--
"Some folks call it a sling blade, I call it a kaiser blade."

Now playing: "Uriah Heep - Sell Your Soul"
Author
27 Feb 2005 1:50 PM
Manda
theyak <y**@dev.null> wrote:

>
> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that
> I know of.

There's DVD Overnight, but I've never personally tried them.

http://www.dvdovernight.com


Manda
Author
27 Feb 2005 9:48 PM
Tarkus
On 2/27/2005 5:50:26 AM, Manda wrote:

> theyak <y**@dev.null> wrote:
>
>>
>> Find a local video store. There's no ala carte online dvd rental that
>> I know of.
>
> There's DVD Overnight, but I've never personally tried them.
>
> http://www.dvdovernight.com

I used them a few years ago and was very pleased with their service.
--
"How can you destroy an army that's already dead?"

Now playing: "Uriah Heep - Too Scared to Run"
Author
25 Feb 2005 6:49 AM
Galley
I prefer Blockbuster's $14.99 plan with two free in-store game rentals per month
(a $12.00 value).


--
"I'm not a cool person in real life, but I play one on the Internet"
Galley
Author
25 Feb 2005 8:11 AM
HellRazor
"Galley" <Galley@Spam-Jammer.galleytech.com> wrote in message
news:rgit11d0f7bmt0b1jles3ua1gqf7hf789p@4ax.com...
>I prefer Blockbuster's $14.99 plan with two free in-store game rentals per
>month
> (a $12.00 value).
>
>
> --
> "I'm not a cool person in real life, but I play one on the Internet"
> Galley

Blockbuster is probably ok if your tastes lean more toward the mass market,
but I'm with the original poster; Netflix has the better selection of films.
Also I refuse to support a rental chain that uses its muscle to influence
the content and packaging of the films I watch.
Author
25 Feb 2005 4:30 PM
Reginald Dwight
In article <t8-dnWTDj9PyQIPfRVn***@comcast.com>,
"HellRazor" <nottel***@no.com> wrote:

> Blockbuster is probably ok if your tastes lean more toward the mass market,
> but I'm with the original poster; Netflix has the better selection of films.

Are you sure about that? A few people posted a while back that they
joined and this wasn't quite as accurate as it used to be. I plugged in
a number of not-so-common titles a while ago and I recall that they all
came up at BB's site.
Author
25 Feb 2005 7:38 PM
theyak
In article <regdwight-4AA013.08304825022***@news.verizon.net>,
regdwi***@verizon.net says...
> In article <t8-dnWTDj9PyQIPfRVn***@comcast.com>,
>  "HellRazor" <nottel***@no.com> wrote:
>
> > Blockbuster is probably ok if your tastes lean more toward the mass market,
> > but I'm with the original poster; Netflix has the better selection of films.
>
> Are you sure about that? A few people posted a while back that they
> joined and this wasn't quite as accurate as it used to be. I plugged in
> a number of not-so-common titles a while ago and I recall that they all
> came up at BB's site.
>


see?
Author
25 Feb 2005 9:19 PM
Reginald Dwight
In article <MPG.1c893be8f28438db989***@news.easynews.com>,
theyak <y**@dev.null> wrote:

Show quote
> In article <regdwight-4AA013.08304825022***@news.verizon.net>,
> regdwi***@verizon.net says...
> > In article <t8-dnWTDj9PyQIPfRVn***@comcast.com>,
> >  "HellRazor" <nottel***@no.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Blockbuster is probably ok if your tastes lean more toward the mass
> > > market,
> > > but I'm with the original poster; Netflix has the better selection of
> > > films.
> >
> > Are you sure about that? A few people posted a while back that they
> > joined and this wasn't quite as accurate as it used to be. I plugged in
> > a number of not-so-common titles a while ago and I recall that they all
> > came up at BB's site.
> >
>
>
> see?

See what?
Author
26 Feb 2005 12:57 AM
Anoni Moose
Reginald Dwight wrote:

> See what?

More like "see when".  Blockbuster is faster than they
used to be.  Used to take maybe 5 minutes to display a
page (to my home DSL browser) where Netflix took a few
seconds.  Blockbuster has sped up lately, but still on the
glacial side.  Would drive me crazy using blockbuster
until they sped things up quite a bit more.

Mike
Author
26 Feb 2005 2:17 AM
Joe Kaffe
"Galley" <Galley@Spam-Jammer.galleytech.com> wrote in message
news:rgit11d0f7bmt0b1jles3ua1gqf7hf789p@4ax.com...
> I prefer Blockbuster's $14.99 plan with two free in-store game rentals per
month
> (a $12.00 value).

I'll be switching back to Netflix when this month's BB subscription ends.
Right now I have 25 titles in my BB queue and 17 of those are listed as
having a short to long wait. None of those titles are new releases! It's
particularly irksome when BB ships discs that are part of a series out of
order. I don't want disc 2 before I've watched disc 1!!!

The thing that enticed me to switch to BB was the two free in-store rentals,
but that too has turn into a source of aggravation. I thought it would be
nice to be able to rent a new release on the spur of the moment, but
evidently their "No Late Fees" policy is playing hell with thier inventory.
I wanted to rent "Saw," but the store didn't have a single copy available. I
looked for two other titles, and they too were unavailable. I left in
disgust and vowed to move BB to the bottom of my list of places to spend my
money!
Author
26 Feb 2005 3:48 AM
Stan Brown
"Joe Kaffe" wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>I'll be switching back to Netflix when this month's BB subscription ends.
>Right now I have 25 titles in my BB queue and 17 of those are listed as
>having a short to long wait. None of those titles are new releases! It's
>particularly irksome when BB ships discs that are part of a series out of
>order. I don't want disc 2 before I've watched disc 1!!!

My understanding from the newsgroup is that Netflix does that too.

Does anybody know whether BB ships the discs of a two-disc movie
separately, as Netflix apparently does?

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
                                  http://OakRoadSystems.com/
DVD FAQ: http://dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html
other FAQs: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/faqget.htm
Author
26 Feb 2005 4:22 AM
Tarkus
On 2/25/2005 7:48:54 PM, Stan Brown wrote:

> "Joe Kaffe" wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>>I'll be switching back to Netflix when this month's BB subscription ends.
>>Right now I have 25 titles in my BB queue and 17 of those are listed as
>>having a short to long wait. None of those titles are new releases! It's
>>particularly irksome when BB ships discs that are part of a series out of
>>order. I don't want disc 2 before I've watched disc 1!!!
>
> My understanding from the newsgroup is that Netflix does that too.

Yes, it can happen if they're all listed together in your queue.  I get
around it by leaving all but one near the bottom of my queue, and move
the first one up near the top.  Then just keep moving them as necessary.
--
"How can you destroy an army that's already dead?"

Now playing: "Uriah Heep - I'm Alive"
Author
26 Feb 2005 3:49 AM
Stan Brown
"Joe Kaffe" wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>The thing that enticed me to switch to BB was the two free in-store rentals,
>but that too has turn into a source of aggravation. I thought it would be
>nice to be able to rent a new release on the spur of the moment, but
>evidently their "No Late Fees" policy is playing hell with thier inventory.

Gee, that's a surprise ... NOT!

It was my first reaction after I heard "no late fees" -- the
invebntory in stores is going to suck even worse.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
                                  http://OakRoadSystems.com/
DVD FAQ: http://dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html
other FAQs: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/faqget.htm
Author
26 Feb 2005 5:00 AM
Boo
There was a PBS series that I found on blockbuster, but they only had 3
of the 7 DVD's in the series.  The other 4 didn't even exist in their
inventory.  Who would want to watch #1, #5, and #6 in a series?
Author
26 Feb 2005 5:56 PM
Jon Purkey
On 25 Feb 2005 21:00:17 -0800, "Boo" <strum4l***@hotmail.com> wrote:

>There was a PBS series that I found on blockbuster, but they only had 3
>of the 7 DVD's in the series.  The other 4 didn't even exist in their
>inventory.  Who would want to watch #1, #5, and #6 in a series?

Someone who has only 2, 3, 4 and 7? :)

Neither Netflix or BB would work for me as I don't regularly watch
enough new DVDs in a month to justify the cost. Some months it would
be great, but other times it would be wasted money.


-
-Jon Purkey - <jonpur***@aol.com)
For a quicker reply by email please use the
address found here: http://tinyurl.com/o8ka
Author
26 Feb 2005 6:30 PM
Invid Fan
In article <cqd1211if1h1d7hgsm7d7fclkv16dqf***@4ax.com>, Jon Purkey
<jonpur***@aol.com> wrote:

> On 25 Feb 2005 21:00:17 -0800, "Boo" <strum4l***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >There was a PBS series that I found on blockbuster, but they only had 3
> >of the 7 DVD's in the series.  The other 4 didn't even exist in their
> >inventory.  Who would want to watch #1, #5, and #6 in a series?
>
> Someone who has only 2, 3, 4 and 7? :)
>
> Neither Netflix or BB would work for me as I don't regularly watch
> enough new DVDs in a month to justify the cost. Some months it would
> be great, but other times it would be wasted money.

You do find yourself renting crap just to see how bad it really is. No
idea how much longer I'll stay, although my queue has filled up again
with "good" stuff after a month of mostly bad horror films.

--
Chris Mack      "Refugee, total sh*t. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan'         Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
                                     -'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
Author
25 Feb 2005 5:13 PM
Bill Davison
Excellent analysis and one with which I toally agree. Netflix is the
cadillac. Blockbuster, a  scooter with a squeaky wheel.

Boo wrote:

Show quote
> I've been a loyal Netflix customer for about two years now, but I
> decided to try Blockbuster's two week trial because it's $3 less per
> month.
>
> I have to say that Blockbuster SUCKS. I quickly realized the main
> reason why I love Netflix over the Goliath chain stores like
> Blockbuster and Hollywood Video. Individual chain stores have limited
> floor space to store their DVD's, so they only buy movies that will
> appeal to the masses. They've been getting away with this for years, so
> now they own truckloads of mass-marketed Hollywood crap and hold a
> limited supply of documentaries and independent films.
>
> Netflix has never had to deal with limited floor space because all
> their customers rent from ONE virtual store with a large selection of
> movies. Blockbuster customers, on the other hand, rent from THOUSANDS
> of stores with a limited selection of movies.
>
> I guess Blockbuster never realized that one of the main reasons people
> rent online is because we can find quality movies that don't exist at
> corporate chain stores like Wal-Mart. If Blockbuster wants to compete,
> they should have every PBS documentary in existence. Instead, they
> launched an online rental service with the exact same strategy as their
> traditional stores. I'll gladly pay Netflix the extra $3 for the better
> selection. They forged an ingenious, new way of renting videos that
> Blockbuster can't even copy correctly.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button