|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dBi Calculation Questioncannot get beyond (although you will probably think this is pretty simple). It is the calculation for a circuit as below. RF Circuit AP--connector (A) -----Cable----Connector (B)----cable---- Connector (C)---Antenna (D) AP is 100mW and the paper is explaining the calculation as below. AP Point A Ponit B Point C Point D 100mW -3dB -3dB -3dB +12dBi =100mW /2 /2 /2 (x2x2x2) =100mW /2 /2 /2 x16 =50mW /2 /2 x16 =25mW /2 x16 =200mW It was my understanding that all dB units (including dBi) are relative units and can be added and subtracted from other dB units - therefore the overall dB should be +3db = doubling the power - hey presto the right answer! What I cant fathom is the calc shown above - why have they suggested a multiple of x2x2x2 ? Can someone please explain why......only a little point but bloody annoying when your are learning this stuff for the first time! Thanks
Show quote
"Rob D" <r**@northamber.com> wrote in message What they are showing is that 100mw/2 = 50mw, 50mw/2=25mw,news:652f8ed5.0502080753.4216a8a6@posting.google.com... > Guys I am working on my CWNA paper and have hit a little point that I > cannot get beyond (although you will probably think this is pretty > simple). > > It is the calculation for a circuit as below. > > RF Circuit > > AP--connector (A) -----Cable----Connector > (B)----cable---- > Connector (C)---Antenna (D) > > AP is 100mW and the paper is explaining the calculation as below. > > AP Point A Ponit B Point C Point D > 100mW -3dB -3dB -3dB +12dBi > =100mW /2 /2 /2 (x2x2x2) > =100mW /2 /2 /2 x16 > =50mW /2 /2 x16 > =25mW /2 x16 > =200mW 25mw/2=12.5mw which is = to -9db the x2x2x2 means +12dbi would take the 12.5mw x 2= 25mw, 25mw x 2=50mw, 50mw x 2 = 100mw = up 9db, just where it started. plus 3 extra dbi = 200mw Make since.... you are right in your calculation, there is a +3db gain, started with 100mw,,, now x2 = 200mw Show quote > It was my understanding that all dB units (including dBi) are relative > units and can be added and subtracted from other dB units - therefore > the overall dB should be +3db = doubling the power - hey presto the > right answer! > > What I cant fathom is the calc shown above - why have they suggested a > multiple of x2x2x2 ? > > Can someone please explain why......only a little point but bloody > annoying when your are learning this stuff for the first time! > > Thanks
Show quote
"Airhead" <campb***@alliancecable.net> wrote in message This should probably say x2x2x2x2. Are you getting this from the CWNAnews:4208ef9c$0$22518$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com... > > "Rob D" <r**@northamber.com> wrote in message > news:652f8ed5.0502080753.4216a8a6@posting.google.com... > > Guys I am working on my CWNA paper and have hit a little point that > I > > cannot get beyond (although you will probably think this is pretty > > simple). > > > > It is the calculation for a circuit as below. > > > > RF Circuit > > > > AP--connector (A) -----Cable----Connector > > (B)----cable---- > > Connector (C)---Antenna (D) > > > > AP is 100mW and the paper is explaining the calculation as below. > > > > AP Point A Ponit B Point C Point D > > 100mW -3dB -3dB -3dB +12dBi > > =100mW /2 /2 /2 (x2x2x2) > > =100mW /2 /2 /2 x16 > > =50mW /2 /2 x16 > > =25mW /2 x16 > > =200mW > > > What they are showing is that 100mw/2 = 50mw, 50mw/2=25mw, > 25mw/2=12.5mw which is = to -9db > > the x2x2x2 means +12dbi would take the 12.5mw x 2= 25mw, 25mw x > 2=50mw, 50mw x 2 = 100mw = up 9db, just where it started. > plus 3 extra dbi = 200mw > > Make since.... you are right in your calculation, there is a +3db > gain, started with 100mw,,, now x2 = 200mw > > > > > > > It was my understanding that all dB units (including dBi) are > relative > > units and can be added and subtracted from other dB units - > therefore > > the overall dB should be +3db = doubling the power - hey presto the > > right answer! > > > > What I cant fathom is the calc shown above - why have they suggested > a > > multiple of x2x2x2 ? study book? Is so what version? Show quote > > > > Can someone please explain why......only a little point but bloody > > annoying when your are learning this stuff for the first time! > > > > Thanks >
Show quote
"Airhead" <campb***@alliancecable.net> wrote in message I just checked my CWNA second version and it says x2x2x2x2news:4208f04f$0$22518$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com... > > "Airhead" <campb***@alliancecable.net> wrote in message > news:4208ef9c$0$22518$2c56edd9@news.cablerocket.com... > > > > "Rob D" <r**@northamber.com> wrote in message > > news:652f8ed5.0502080753.4216a8a6@posting.google.com... > > > Guys I am working on my CWNA paper and have hit a little point > that > > I > > > cannot get beyond (although you will probably think this is pretty > > > simple). > > > > > > It is the calculation for a circuit as below. > > > > > > RF Circuit > > > > > > AP--connector (A) -----Cable----Connector > > > (B)----cable---- > > > Connector (C)---Antenna (D) > > > > > > AP is 100mW and the paper is explaining the calculation as below. > > > > > > AP Point A Ponit B Point C Point D > > > 100mW -3dB -3dB -3dB +12dBi > > > =100mW /2 /2 /2 (x2x2x2) > > > =100mW /2 /2 /2 x16 > > > =50mW /2 /2 x16 > > > =25mW /2 x16 > > > =200mW > > > > > > What they are showing is that 100mw/2 = 50mw, 50mw/2=25mw, > > 25mw/2=12.5mw which is = to -9db > > > > the x2x2x2 means +12dbi would take the 12.5mw x 2= 25mw, 25mw x > > 2=50mw, 50mw x 2 = 100mw = up 9db, just where it started. > > plus 3 extra dbi = 200mw > > > > Make since.... you are right in your calculation, there is a +3db > > gain, started with 100mw,,, now x2 = 200mw > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was my understanding that all dB units (including dBi) are > > relative > > > units and can be added and subtracted from other dB units - > > therefore > > > the overall dB should be +3db = doubling the power - hey presto > the > > > right answer! > > > > > > What I cant fathom is the calc shown above - why have they > suggested > > a > > > multiple of x2x2x2 ? > > This should probably say x2x2x2x2. Are you getting this from the CWNA > study book? > Is so what version? > > > > > > > > > > Can someone please explain why......only a little point but bloody > > > annoying when your are learning this stuff for the first time! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||