|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Linksys or Netgear?Is there a preferred vendor for a home router? Which is the least
problematic? I'm looking at the WRT54G or WGR614 respectively. Bob Bob <bobh1***@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:rhdf01dnjknrnatnm97rm42mroiidr884j@4ax.com: linksys has seemed much better from my experience.> Is there a preferred vendor for a home router? Which is the least > problematic? I'm looking at the WRT54G or WGR614 respectively. > > Bob > > i've had both installed at a few business locations, and the linksys always seems to cause less problems. i've been called in to help with netgear routers WAY too often. and usually the solution is just to throw in a linksys, or something commercial, but linksys usually seems to solve the problem. smowk Smowk <Smowk***@Yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xns95F68E572D0FDSmowkieBandit@
216.196.97.131: > i've been called in to help with netgear Did you understand Netgear Support's English? Last time I called, Netgear > routers WAY too often. support was in "Tennessee", but they had Indian accents. I didn't know Tennessee had a large Indian population. -- Lucas Tam (REMOVEn***@rogers.com) Please delete "REMOVE" from the e-mail address when replying. http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/coolspot18/ Lucas Tam <REMOVEn***@rogers.com> wrote:
> Did you understand Netgear Support's English? Last time I called, Netgear I think that is the landing point for their VoIP network.> support was in "Tennessee", but they had Indian accents. I didn't know > Tennessee had a large Indian population. -- --- Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5 d***@XReXXLinks.usenet.us.com wrote in news:cu8h46$hjm$4@blue.rahul.net: That's what I thought. I wish Indian call centers wouldn't pretend they're > Lucas Tam <REMOVEn***@rogers.com> wrote: >> Did you understand Netgear Support's English? Last time I called, >> Netgear support was in "Tennessee", but they had Indian accents. I >> didn't know Tennessee had a large Indian population. > > I think that is the landing point for their VoIP network. in North America. The fact that the agents have heavy accents and don't understand common North American slang pretty much gives away they're not in Canada/US. -- Lucas Tam (REMOVEn***@rogers.com) Please delete "REMOVE" from the e-mail address when replying. http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/coolspot18/ Lucas Tam <REMOVEn***@rogers.com> wrote in
news:Xns95F69020C370nntprogerscom@140.99.99.130: come on now...everywhere has a large indian population these days> Smowk <Smowk***@Yahoo.com> wrote in > news:Xns95F68E572D0FDSmowkieBandit@ 216.196.97.131: > >> i've been called in to help with netgear >> routers WAY too often. > > Did you understand Netgear Support's English? Last time I called, > Netgear support was in "Tennessee", but they had Indian accents. I > didn't know Tennessee had a large Indian population. > "Smowk" <Smowk***@Yahoo.com> wrote in message What issues have you seen where replacing a netgear with a linksys fixed thenews:Xns95F68E572D0FDSmowkieBandit@216.196.97.131... > > linksys has seemed much better from my experience. > > i've had both installed at a few business locations, and the linksys always > seems to cause less problems. i've been called in to help with netgear > routers WAY too often. and usually the solution is just to throw in a > linksys, or something commercial, but linksys usually seems to solve the > problem. > > smowk problem?
Show quote
"George" <george@nospam.invalid> wrote in all 3 of the times i've installed a netgear router/access point, it's news:K4SdnQw_2c4VIZrfRVn-2w@adelphia.com: > > "Smowk" <Smowk***@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:Xns95F68E572D0FDSmowkieBandit@216.196.97.131... >> >> linksys has seemed much better from my experience. >> >> i've had both installed at a few business locations, and the linksys > always >> seems to cause less problems. i've been called in to help with >> netgear routers WAY too often. and usually the solution is just to >> throw in a linksys, or something commercial, but linksys usually >> seems to solve the problem. >> >> smowk > > What issues have you seen where replacing a netgear with a linksys > fixed the problem? > > > caused random (and I mean random) computers at each location to just lose their connection. reboot, it just sits there in "acquring network address" stage. I've used linksys adapters, netgear adapters, and belkin adapters, all causing the same problem (which led me to believe it was the AP/router (which it was...i guess). I've also tried using windows xp's network utility, and the 3rd party utilities to connect...same thing. deleting the profile, and re-setting up the AP/router on the client (WEP and all) seems to work, but most of the office workers don't really understand a lot of that stuff, and teaching them 3 & 4 times doesnt' seem to help either. this is why i installed linksys APs/routers (with the newest firmware, which of course i tried with the netgears) which worked perfectly. I literally haven't been back since... smowk On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:41:45 -0500, Bob <bobh1***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Is there a preferred vendor for a home router? Which is the least I've used both and the Netgear product performed better for me and my>problematic? I'm looking at the WRT54G or WGR614 respectively. > >Bob situation. Both are popular brands for home and small business use and you will find people who swears by them both. Still, like any other product, there are pros and cons. In my experience, The Linksys WRT54G kept dropping signals, but other linksys products did not. In regards to the Netgear WGR614 (my experience has been with version 1), it kept overheating and needed to be rebooted too much. On the other hand, other Netgear products performed flawessly. Maybe I had a couple of lemons...maybe not. Anyway, just pick one, take it home and try it. If it's not to your liking, take it back and try the another brand. You're soon to find one that will suit your needs. Take care. Doug Jamal <bishiv***@yahooDOT.com> wrote in
news:piof01p5ok869ltgs7nteepogmcrq2i7sg@4ax.com: thats the problem i had with netgear...and the wrt54g fixed it right > In my experience, The Linksys > WRT54G kept dropping signals, but other linksys products did not. up...weird "Bob" <bobh1***@hotmail.com> wrote in message pretty much the same - buy the cheapest ;)news:rhdf01dnjknrnatnm97rm42mroiidr884j@4ax.com... > Is there a preferred vendor for a home router? Which is the least > problematic? I'm looking at the WRT54G or WGR614 respectively. > > Bob > I can't. I need to pick which is "the best" because I'll be buying
100 of them for remote users at my company. I'm the IT guy in charge of deciding which is best for the home/VPN users. I do have both for testing, and both perform okay, but in just a few days testing I won't be able to tell the long term longevity. If I wanted to spend a little more money on a better (read: more reliable) all-in-one router/firewall/WAP, which would be the best bet? -Bob Show quote On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:58:01 +0000 (UTC), "MM" <mmal***@btinernet.com> wrote: > >"Bob" <bobh1***@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:rhdf01dnjknrnatnm97rm42mroiidr884j@4ax.com... >> Is there a preferred vendor for a home router? Which is the least >> problematic? I'm looking at the WRT54G or WGR614 respectively. >> >> Bob >> >pretty much the same - buy the cheapest ;) >
Show quote
"Rob" <bobh1***@hotmail.com> wrote in message They are cheap enough to by 2 for every site, that way your a** isnews:uctf01pj8kbsduotlad44j6cmbs9ltlhc9@4ax.com... > I can't. I need to pick which is "the best" because I'll be buying > 100 of them for remote users at my company. I'm the IT guy in charge > of deciding which is best for the home/VPN users. I do have both for > testing, and both perform okay, but in just a few days testing I won't > be able to tell the long term longevity. > > If I wanted to spend a little more money on a better (read: more > reliable) all-in-one router/firewall/WAP, which would be the best bet? covered. I have had no problems with linksys, havent used a netgear but I find that netgears website has a lot better info than linksys which counts for something. 3com is also a nice product and I think are a step above some other brands. Netgear has some business class firewall routers that are probably more reliable too. Business class equipment is designed for reliability, home stuff is cheap and uses the cheapest components but are also the cheapest to replace if they fail. I would read all the faqs and support issues for both products and make sure that your environment does not include something that is problematic in a particular brand. Before you ship them make sure they have the latest firmware fixes!! Rob <bobh1***@hotmail.com> wrote in news:uctf01pj8kbsduotlad44j6cmbs9ltlhc9
@4ax.com: > I can't. I need to pick which is "the best" because I'll be buying Check out Zyxel or Sonic Firewall. They offer better grade stuff. Sonic > 100 of them for remote users at my company. I'm the IT guy in charge > of deciding which is best for the home/VPN users. I do have both for > testing, and both perform okay, but in just a few days testing I won't > be able to tell the long term longevity. > > If I wanted to spend a little more money on a better (read: more > reliable) all-in-one router/firewall/WAP, which would be the best bet? Firewall does have an expensive licensing scheme tho, so you might be better off with Zyxel's Zywall routers/firewalls. -- Lucas Tam (REMOVEn***@rogers.com) Please delete "REMOVE" from the e-mail address when replying. http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/coolspot18/ Do you mean Sonicwalls? We use Sonicwalls for some of our permanent
sites, but they are too expensive and WAY too cumbersome for an initial setup to be mass deployed. If Sonicwall would fix their registration requirement on that extremely slow web site, I might change my mind. However, we don't need lan-to-lan VPN's anyway, hence the Sonicwall's high price. Zyxel is the same way. 3COM I never considered. They are under $100 for the 3COM Officeconnect cable/DSL router. Any experience with those?? Bob On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 01:33:35 GMT, Lucas Tam <REMOVEn***@rogers.com> wrote: Show quote >Rob <bobh1***@hotmail.com> wrote in news:uctf01pj8kbsduotlad44j6cmbs9ltlhc9 >@4ax.com: > >> I can't. I need to pick which is "the best" because I'll be buying >> 100 of them for remote users at my company. I'm the IT guy in charge >> of deciding which is best for the home/VPN users. I do have both for >> testing, and both perform okay, but in just a few days testing I won't >> be able to tell the long term longevity. >> >> If I wanted to spend a little more money on a better (read: more >> reliable) all-in-one router/firewall/WAP, which would be the best bet? > >Check out Zyxel or Sonic Firewall. They offer better grade stuff. Sonic >Firewall does have an expensive licensing scheme tho, so you might be >better off with Zyxel's Zywall routers/firewalls. "Bob" wrote in message
> Is there a preferred vendor for a home router? Which is the least I'd go with Linksys. I only messed with a Netgear router once (friend who> problematic? I'm looking at the WRT54G or WGR614 respectively. needed help getting it up), but found it to be quite flakey. All the Linksys hardware that I've gone through in public (hotel, hot spots, etc) always was very stable though. I'm using all D-Link (router, two AP's, bridges, repeater, client hardware, etc) at home and have found D-Link to work very well -- once it's up -- however the documentation for D-Link can be atrocious. General information is liberally provided with hardware and their "support" web site, but getting more technical information needed for many "advanced features" can be like pulling teeth. I've found myself using Linksys's web site on many occassions to answer questions about my D-Link hardware. Go figure. D-Link = excellent hardware (at least in my experience), but horrible documentation. Bob wrote:
> Is there a preferred vendor for a home router? Which is the least Have good luck with Linksys. Did have trouble with the firmware on some> problematic? I'm looking at the WRT54G or WGR614 respectively. > > Bob models, but they finally got it right. -- Robert - slackware Robert <redn***@lowtech.net> wrote in news:g_7Od.3180$UX3.3065
@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net: > Bob wrote: I think that's true with most of the wireless adapters/routers/APs. At > >> Is there a preferred vendor for a home router? Which is the least >> problematic? I'm looking at the WRT54G or WGR614 respectively. >> >> Bob > Have good luck with Linksys. Did have trouble with the firmware on some > models, but they finally got it right. first, they weren't too...ROBUST...but now they work fine for me. in other words UPDATE FIRMWARE ASAP if your using something older Smowk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||