|
pc
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
The Jackal (1998) DTS vs non-DTS
Am I better off with the non-DTS version if I value video quality over DTS? (Someone sold me the wrong version on half.com & before I blast their feedback, I need to know if it's worth it). I have a couple of DVDs with DTS tracks, like What Lies Beneath, and the video quality is sh*t. Aphelion See here www.dvdfile.com/software/review/dvd-video/jackal_dts.htm
VIDEO: Each version is nearly identical in colour, black level, shadow detail, and overall detail. What I did find slightly different is the DTS' lack of digital shimmer in certain shots. At the 71-minute mark, during chapter 19 of the Dolby Digital edition for example, this shimmer is visible around the crow's feet next to Willis' eyes. On the DTS version, the shimmer is not there. A check of the bitrate meter revealed a rate of just under 6 on the DD with the same shot at 8.5 on the DTS. This is hardly a distraction on the DD version and both editions will be sure to please. AUDIO: Dolby Digital vs. DTS, that is the question. First, let me state that the Dolby Digital 5.1 version of The Jackal is excellent, with great use of the surrounds and LFE channel. That said, I was immediately drawn to the improvements the DTS version had to offer. The simplest way to explain this is that when I listened to the DD version, sound was directional and was very specific to the soundstage. When I put in the DTS version, the soundtrack was more three dimensional and actually moved forward from the individual speakers to sound more full as if a veil had been placed over the DD and then removed on the DTS edition. -- Show quoteHide quoteRegards Lester Bangs No [SPACE] to reply Bored ... Check out what drains my wallet.. consistently http://www.dvdprofiler.com/mc.asp?alias=ppurcell&sc=C&type=O&ls=D "Festivous for the Rest of Us" - Costanza Senior "Aphelion" <sons***@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message news:i4F4e.60427$Ms3.15753@twister.nyroc.rr.com... > Does the DTS track on The Jackal (1998) significantly cut into the > bitrate? Am I better off with the non-DTS version if I value video quality > over DTS? (Someone sold me the wrong version on half.com & before I blast > their feedback, I need to know if it's worth it). I have a couple of DVDs > with DTS tracks, like What Lies Beneath, and the video quality is sh*t. > > Aphelion >
Anyone use DVD Profiler?
NTSC/PAL Question DVD protect How to identify 'PAL' DVD source? alt.video.dvd Frequently Asked Questions Does anyone know why MGM's Midnite Movies are not out? North by Northwest Extras Question mpeg to dvd New releases: My Brilliant Career, Dirty Shame & Stripes: Updated complete downloadable R1 DVD DB & Q: Looney Tunes box sets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||